What's new

HRW asks Pakistan to stop forced return of Afghans

should we allow the Human Rights Watch to dictate us on how to handle the afghans in our country


  • Total voters
    28
  • Poll closed .

kaonalpha

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Says Pakistani officials should not be ‘scapegoating’ Afghans because of Taliban’s atrocities in PeshawarIOM reports 33,000 undocumented Afghans ‘spontaneously returned’ from Pakistan in a year

The Pakistan government should immediately order local authorities to stop pressuring registered refugees to return to Afghanistan, the Human Rights Watch (HRW) said Sunday.

The Pakistan government has an obligation to protect all Afghans in the country, including those not registered as refugees, from harassment and other abuses, the rights group said in a statement.

A recent increase in Afghans repatriating from Pakistan appears related to coercive pressure from local governments on Afghans to return to their country since the December 16, 2014 attack by the Pakistani Taliban splinter group Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) on a school in Peshawar in north-western Pakistan. The attack left at least 148 dead – almost all of them children.

“Pakistani officials should not be scapegoating Afghans because of the Taliban’s atrocities in Peshawar,” said HRW Asia Deputy Director Phelim Kine. “It is inhumane, not to mention unlawful, to return Afghans to places they may face harm and not protect them from harassment and abuse.”

Nine times as many Afghan refugees were repatriated from Pakistan in January 2015 as in December 2014, according to the UN refugee agency (UNHCR). UNHCR analysis of the returns indicated that a significant percentage of these 3,829 returns were coercive. Nearly all of the refugees returned from three Pakistani provinces – Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Azad Kashmir, and Punjab – where an increase in arrests, detentions, and evictions of Afghans were reported during the same period.

Those registered as refugees possess Proof of Registration (PoR) issued by the Pakistani government, with the support of UNHCR. Although UNHCR reports a decrease in the number of PoR cardholders returning to Afghanistan since the last week of January 2015, International Organization for Migration (IOM) figures show a comparable rate of returns of undocumented Afghans in the first two weeks of February compared with January.

The overwhelming majority of Afghans who have left Pakistan since December 16, 2014, have not been formally deported, but are rather categorized as “spontaneous returns.” The IOM reported that more than 33,000 undocumented Afghans had “spontaneously returned” from Pakistan from the beginning of 2014 through the first two weeks of February 2015, a 155 percent increase from all spontaneous returns through the end of 2014.

The rate of spontaneous returns of undocumented Afghans increased from an average of 59 a day in 2014 to 749 in the first six weeks of 2015. An IOM official told HRW that many of the unregistered Afghan returnees reported that they had left Pakistan to escape harassment following the Peshawar attack.

In December 2014, the Pakistani government specifically assured Afghan refugees that the Peshawar attack would not prompt any official reprisals.

The Ministry of States and Frontier Regions pledged that the government would “maintain its traditional hospitality” toward Afghan refugees. Despite these assurances, since December 16 there have been numerous reports of government and public harassment and intimidation against the country’s Afghan population.

Those reports include accounts that police have threatened Afghans with arrest unless they leave the country immediately.

The Hangu district government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa announced on February 11, 2015, that it would require all registered Afghan refugees to relocate to a government-supervised camp and that it would deport any undocumented Afghan citizens.

Afghanistan currently produces the second-largest number of refugees in the world, after Syria. Pakistan has hosted about 1.5 million registered Afghan refugees for more than 30 years, while another 1 million unregistered Afghans live in the country.

The Pakistani government has legitimate authority to deport undocumented migrants but should give those who might fear persecution upon return the opportunity to lodge asylum claims, and otherwise treat them with dignity.

“Pakistan’s government is tarnishing the country’s well-deserved reputation for hospitality toward refugees by tolerating the punitive and potentially unlawful coercive repatriation of Afghan refugees,” Kine said.

“The government needs to defend the rights of its Afghan population and ensure that local authorities aren’t carrying out vindictive reprisals for an atrocity the Afghan refugees bear no responsibility for.”


I think The HRW can mind its own business and take its concerns up their asses.The US should be questioned on human rights , India should be criticised every other country first than us.
 
.
We can do what we like . HRW can kiss my .... talk about human rights.Time has come for the Afghan refugees to return home.
 
.
I think The HRW can mind its own business and take its concerns up their asses.The US should be questioned on human rights , India should be criticised every other country first than us.

Off course. Pakistan with its sterling human rights record should be the last nation on earth which this pesky Human Rights Watch should be pointing fingers at :D
 
.
They all would have been allowed to stay but due to circumstances they will have to go back to their country without any question.Also all human rights bullshit go down the drain when attacks like 9/11,Paris attack happens.
 
.
They all would have been allowed to stay but due to circumstances they will have to go back to their country without any question.Also all human rights bullshit go down the drain when attacks like 9/11,Paris attack happens.

They can't do shit about real attrocities bein committed in occupied regions & states ...yet sending back millions of refugees after decades gives em orgasms.
 
. .
Tell hrw to hop off the nut sack.

Says Pakistani officials should not be ‘scapegoating’ Afghans because of Taliban’s atrocities in PeshawarIOM reports 33,000 undocumented Afghans ‘spontaneously returned’ from Pakistan in a year

The Pakistan government should immediately order local authorities to stop pressuring registered refugees to return to Afghanistan, the Human Rights Watch (HRW) said Sunday.

The Pakistan government has an obligation to protect all Afghans in the country, including those not registered as refugees, from harassment and other abuses, the rights group said in a statement.

A recent increase in Afghans repatriating from Pakistan appears related to coercive pressure from local governments on Afghans to return to their country since the December 16, 2014 attack by the Pakistani Taliban splinter group Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) on a school in Peshawar in north-western Pakistan. The attack left at least 148 dead – almost all of them children.

“Pakistani officials should not be scapegoating Afghans because of the Taliban’s atrocities in Peshawar,” said HRW Asia Deputy Director Phelim Kine. “It is inhumane, not to mention unlawful, to return Afghans to places they may face harm and not protect them from harassment and abuse.”

Nine times as many Afghan refugees were repatriated from Pakistan in January 2015 as in December 2014, according to the UN refugee agency (UNHCR). UNHCR analysis of the returns indicated that a significant percentage of these 3,829 returns were coercive. Nearly all of the refugees returned from three Pakistani provinces – Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Azad Kashmir, and Punjab – where an increase in arrests, detentions, and evictions of Afghans were reported during the same period.

Those registered as refugees possess Proof of Registration (PoR) issued by the Pakistani government, with the support of UNHCR. Although UNHCR reports a decrease in the number of PoR cardholders returning to Afghanistan since the last week of January 2015, International Organization for Migration (IOM) figures show a comparable rate of returns of undocumented Afghans in the first two weeks of February compared with January.

The overwhelming majority of Afghans who have left Pakistan since December 16, 2014, have not been formally deported, but are rather categorized as “spontaneous returns.” The IOM reported that more than 33,000 undocumented Afghans had “spontaneously returned” from Pakistan from the beginning of 2014 through the first two weeks of February 2015, a 155 percent increase from all spontaneous returns through the end of 2014.

The rate of spontaneous returns of undocumented Afghans increased from an average of 59 a day in 2014 to 749 in the first six weeks of 2015. An IOM official told HRW that many of the unregistered Afghan returnees reported that they had left Pakistan to escape harassment following the Peshawar attack.

In December 2014, the Pakistani government specifically assured Afghan refugees that the Peshawar attack would not prompt any official reprisals.

The Ministry of States and Frontier Regions pledged that the government would “maintain its traditional hospitality” toward Afghan refugees. Despite these assurances, since December 16 there have been numerous reports of government and public harassment and intimidation against the country’s Afghan population.

Those reports include accounts that police have threatened Afghans with arrest unless they leave the country immediately.

The Hangu district government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa announced on February 11, 2015, that it would require all registered Afghan refugees to relocate to a government-supervised camp and that it would deport any undocumented Afghan citizens.

Afghanistan currently produces the second-largest number of refugees in the world, after Syria. Pakistan has hosted about 1.5 million registered Afghan refugees for more than 30 years, while another 1 million unregistered Afghans live in the country.

The Pakistani government has legitimate authority to deport undocumented migrants but should give those who might fear persecution upon return the opportunity to lodge asylum claims, and otherwise treat them with dignity.

“Pakistan’s government is tarnishing the country’s well-deserved reputation for hospitality toward refugees by tolerating the punitive and potentially unlawful coercive repatriation of Afghan refugees,” Kine said.

“The government needs to defend the rights of its Afghan population and ensure that local authorities aren’t carrying out vindictive reprisals for an atrocity the Afghan refugees bear no responsibility for.”


I think The HRW can mind its own business and take its concerns up their asses.The US should be questioned on human rights , India should be criticised every other country first than us.

images
 
.
Off course. Pakistan with its sterling human rights record should be the last nation on earth which this pesky Human Rights Watch should be pointing fingers at :D

Says someone from THE RAPE CAPITAL OF THE WORLD.
 
.
and who is HRW to tell us that ??
Afghans must go back to their country .. enough backstabbing Pakistan
 
.
Says someone from THE RAPE CAPITAL OF THE WORLD.

Yousaf, that is becoming boring. Let me help you out here. The Democratic Republic of Congo is classified as the "rape capital of the world". India is nowhere near that title. In fact, per capita on comparison, the USA ranks above India in the number of rapes per capita. Now that I have educated you with facts, let's return to the vexing issue of Pakistan's abuse of human rights when it comes to the issue of Afghan refugees
 
.
Yousaf, that is becoming boring. Let me help you out here. The Democratic Republic of Congo is classified as the "rape capital of the world". India is nowhere near that title. In fact, per capita on comparison, the USA ranks above India in the number of rapes per capita. Now that I have educated you with facts, let's return to the vexing issue of Pakistan's abuse of human rights when it comes to the issue of Afghan refugees

The non-stop claims of you Indians of knowing the 'facts' are absurd. India is the Rape Capital of the world, you can deny it if you want. Besides, a look at the HRW site would give you an overview of human rights abuses of your 'shining' India.

'India has significant human rights problems despite making commitments to tackle some of the most prevalent abuses. There are increased restrictions on Internet freedom; continued marginalization of Dalits, tribal groups, religious minorities, sexual and gender minorities, and people with disabilities; and persistent impunity for abuses linked to insurgencies, particularly in Maoist areas, Jammu and Kashmir, Manipur, and Assam. Many children remain at risk of abuse and deprived of education. India’s free media, vibrant civil society, and independent judiciary often act as checks on abusive practices but reluctance to hold public officials to account for abuses or dereliction of duty fosters a culture of corruption and impunity. India continues to use laws to stifle dissent by restricting access to foreign funding for domestic nongovernmental organizations that are critical of the government.'


And guess what? I couldn't care less what goes on across the border. But you are obsessed with Pakistan, so I appreciate your concern. Indeed we have a lot of issues when it comes to human rights, like a million other problems we face.
 
.
The non-stop claims of you Indians of knowing the 'facts' are absurd. India is the Rape Capital of the world, you can deny it if you want. Besides, a look at the HRW site would give you an overview of human rights abuses of your 'shining' India.

'India has significant human rights problems despite making commitments to tackle some of the most prevalent abuses. There are increased restrictions on Internet freedom; continued marginalization of Dalits, tribal groups, religious minorities, sexual and gender minorities, and people with disabilities; and persistent impunity for abuses linked to insurgencies, particularly in Maoist areas, Jammu and Kashmir, Manipur, and Assam. Many children remain at risk of abuse and deprived of education. India’s free media, vibrant civil society, and independent judiciary often act as checks on abusive practices but reluctance to hold public officials to account for abuses or dereliction of duty fosters a culture of corruption and impunity. India continues to use laws to stifle dissent by restricting access to foreign funding for domestic nongovernmental organizations that are critical of the government.'


And guess what? I couldn't care less what goes on across the border. But you are obsessed with Pakistan, so I appreciate your concern. Indeed we have a lot of issues when it comes to human rights, like a million other problems we face.

Fact are established through research and from assimilating, well, facts and not from camp-side gossip or perceptions. Restrictions on internet access is acceptable when a state of emergency arises in any country and India is no exception. Good that you clarified that these restrictions arise when action is being conducted against insurgency and not as as the norm. Unlike Pakistan and certain other Islamic States, marginalization of Dalits and other minorities are not state sanctioned nor institutionalized in the constitution. They are cultural prejudices which are being addressed by the constitution of India, the relevant legislation and reservation quotas which are used to improve the lot of minorities. The remaining hulllahoo which you spurt out about India is absolute nonsense which you in all probabilities picked up from some dissenting NGO journalist ticked off that their funds which were badly accounted for was muzzled by government. Heck, sue us for keeping up with international norms when it comes to our laws on funding and prevention of terrorist activities.

Good that you don't feel our problems are worth your scrutiny. In fact that mindset is commendable given the state of our respective nations on a political and economic level. Considering that we started off a journey together, it remains amazing where the paths have led us to. We have no obsession with Pakistan. Our concerns aren't about whether you should vote in Imran Khan or Nawaz Sharif or whether you should embrace secularism or remain an Islamic Republic. Frankly, unlike most Pakistanis and their attitude towards India, we don't care about nor wish to bother ourselves about the pathetic ruin which is called Pakistan. When you persist in being a security threat to our nation though or when you bully your neighbors such as Afghanistan and East Pakistan in the past, don't expect us to fold our arms and sit back and wave at you. It remains our international right to condemn you
 
.
Border needs to be manned to keep them out. What has been done on the border?
 
.
Okay i have a win win situation for both HRW and Pakistan. HRW can negotiate with western countries to accept all those Afghans in Pakistan and facilitate them in getting Permanent Residency or citizenship in the country they move to.

Afghans happy, Pakistanis happy, HRW happy :D
 
.
Fact are established through research and from assimilating, well, facts and not from camp-side gossip or perceptions. Restrictions on internet access is acceptable when a state of emergency arises in any country and India is no exception. Good that you clarified that these restrictions arise when action is being conducted against insurgency and not as as the norm. Unlike Pakistan and certain other Islamic States, marginalization of Dalits and other minorities are not state sanctioned nor institutionalized in the constitution. They are cultural prejudices which are being addressed by the constitution of India, the relevant legislation and reservation quotas which are used to improve the lot of minorities. The remaining hulllahoo which you spurt out about India is absolute nonsense which you in all probabilities picked up from some dissenting NGO journalist ticked off that their funds which were badly accounted for was muzzled by government. Heck, sue us for keeping up with international norms when it comes to our laws on funding and prevention of terrorist activities.

Good that you don't feel our problems are worth your scrutiny. In fact that mindset is commendable given the state of our respective nations on a political and economic level. Considering that we started off a journey together, it remains amazing where the paths have led us to. We have no obsession with Pakistan. Our concerns aren't about whether you should vote in Imran Khan or Nawaz Sharif or whether you should embrace secularism or remain an Islamic Republic. Frankly, unlike most Pakistanis and their attitude towards India, we don't care about nor wish to bother ourselves about the pathetic ruin which is called Pakistan. When you persist in being a security threat to our nation though or when you bully your neighbors such as Afghanistan and East Pakistan in the past, don't expect us to fold our arms and sit back and wave at you. It remains our international right to condemn you

As I said, I have zero interest in whatever goes on in India so your rant to explain is wasted on me.

You don't wish to bother yourselves with Pakistan, then why are you here on this thread ? :D the usual cunning and deceitful Hindu banya.

As for you stopping us from 'bullying our neighbours', first of all *who* is talking ? and second, you can dream as much as you want about becoming a thekedar of South Asia, Pakistan will always be there to remind you thats not going to happen.

Some dreams are not supposed to come true, haven't you heard?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom