What's new

How would Modi respond to a 26/11 like attack?

Could've should've would've. Cannot believe what did not happen.
Yes. Because your leader was too impatient and jittery

India invaded the state of Hyderabad, what was the guarantee that it would not do the same with the non-muslim ruler of Kashmir? Post partition, India and Pakistan were scrambling to protect their interests and as such were free to do as they wish.
Hyderabad was not contiguous with Pakistan. J&K was and was muslim dominated. And if India attacked, it would have been Pakistan who would have had the upper hand. But we will never find that out now. Will we ?


Like i said, you believe in the trash taught to you. That is fine by me.
True. Just like the trash Pakistani leadership cooked up in 1948 to justify its incompetence resulting in the loss of the strategic J&K areas and handing over the control of Pakistani lifeline rivers to India
 
.
Every account except in Pakistani history books clearly shows that the Indian army landed in Kashmir only when the Pakistani sent terrorists were at the gates or Srinagar and maharaja of Kashmir requested assistence. Whatever may be the reason, Jinnah (or Liaqat Khan) sending armed non uniformed men to attack, pillage, rape and kill Kashmiri civilians was the first act of terrorism in post British subcontinent. Even if Jinnah was not directly instrumental in sending the tribals, by the virtue of being the leader of Pakistan at the time, he was responsible


Draw a graph of violence in Pakistan before and after 2008. You will see the response
dude Pakistan is at war and you call it violence, you are a spin master again you say Pakistan sent in armed forces, dude at the time of Partition Pakistan had no Army, India got all Armed forces and equipment.that was suppose to be shared with Pakistan as were the other things like treasuries, factories, planes etc,etc.so you argument is strange and a spin.

According to the rule of partition the will of people was to be the main point of partition and by this Kashmirs were to come to Pakistan, when Nehru saw it he sent armies to not only Kashmir, Hyderabad, junagarh and other places. took all those areas by force.

You ask me a question then accuse me of spinning it before I answer it. Great logic.....how about Pakistan donate 2000 crores like India did...if its such an integrl part of Pakistan?

And you think you can buy people either by money or by force, dude, you cannot eventually you will have to bow to the will of people, it depends on your sense of morality, either after killing million or two or do it a.s.a.p. to avoid the killings of innocents.
 
Last edited:
.
dude Pakistan is at war and you call it violence, you are a spin master again you say Pakistan sent in armed forces, dude at the time of Partition Pakistan had no Army, India got all Armed forces and equipment.that was suppose to be shared with Pakistan as were the other things like treasuries, factories, planes etc,etc.so you argument is strange and a spin.

According to the rule of partition the will of people was to be the main point of partition and by this Kashmirs were to come to Pakistan, when Nehru saw it he sent armies to not only Kashmir, Hyderabad, junagarh and other places. took all those areas by force.
Wrong. Pakistan had an army, but the CinC refused to attack Kashmir post which Jinnah sent in the terrorists.

Well, you guys gave the excuse to India to send in the forces when Maharaja of Kashmir appealed to India to save Kashmiri civilians from the Pakistan terrorists. Rest is history.
 
.
Wrong. Pakistan had an army, but the CinC refused to attack Kashmir post which Jinnah sent in the terrorists.

Well, you guys gave the excuse to India to send in the forces when Maharaja of Kashmir appealed to India to save Kashmiri civilians from the Pakistan terrorists. Rest is history.
it was not the call of maharajah to decide nor India, it was to be based on population strength if Muslim go to Pakistan if Hindus go India. population to decided the rational used for partition.
 
.
it was not the call of maharajah to decide nor India, it was to be based on population strength if Muslim go to Pakistan if Hindus go India. population to decided the rational used for partition.
I fully agree. And that's what would have happened, had Jinnah not lost his nerve and tried to preempt the decision by sending in the tribal terrorists to capture Srinagar. It gave the Hindu Maharaja the valid reason to invite India. India was just waiting for an opportunity like this and jumped at it. Frankly, Jinnah played right into India's hands on this issue and gave the control of Pakistan's water life line to India.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom