Deepika Maheshwari
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2016
- Messages
- 260
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
Lead is used but how thick layer...do you have any idea and there is something called saturation.,,,once the metal gets saturated, the radiations can pass through.
Neutron bombs also have a nuclear explosion, a little mushroom cloud and intense heat radiation too.
Some will die immediately especially the ones very close the centre of the blast and rest will be immediately will be disabled and die later but won't be able to do anything else other suffer with extreme pain and feel burnt. I would think the ones closer to the point of impact to be luckier than those are farther away.
Neutrons can cause induced radioactivity in stable nuclii and in long run that is more lethal than saturation effect. But then these are all long run scenarios. Total time of a ERW neutron flux is in micro seconds.
Goal of a ERW design is to minimize heat and shockwave. Most of the energy goes into neutron flux and gamma radiation because you want to maximize human deaths. If you want thermal and shock waves, a conventional fission based design will do. Surely people who are very near to the blast will get instant death but then ERWs are effective because they can kill people using radiation in a wider area. Also remember that both shockwave intensity and thermal 'fireball' have their energy spread in accordance to inverse cubic law so effects decay much faster. Lastly, people have suffered more than lethal radiation but still have lived for few days before succumbing to the damage. Look at the deamon core accident. And no, Gamma radiation and neutron dont exactly cause disability but sure death in about 3 days to a week.
As much as I understand, and I may be wrong, goal of a Pakistani war planner will be to stop an advancing column of tanks. For that they are more likely to use small sub-kiloton fission based bombs - like of which India and Pakistan tested in 1998 in their later tests. ERWs have a totally different role. Usually when you want to occupy a city or industrial area later so you dont want to blow up the infrastructure.
The only thing that we have committed to -- Internationally is that we will
NOT test a Nuclear weapon
But in today' s times you dont have to test
All such experiments are done in labs and on super computers
The designs are constantly checked ; refined and improved
All the people who were involved in Pokhran 2 have retired
18 years have passed since 1998
A new Generation has taken over and they have
not only learnt but also improved the Art and science of making these weapons
Correct me if I am wrong, if you are having a weapon of last resort, you will want it to work and possibly you will also want you enemy to know that it will work so that they don't push you into corner. What we have right now is a weapon design whose reliability has been called into question. And on top of that if you want to assert that you have possibly more advanced design like ERW, then, well someone may just call your bluff.
Last edited: