ThatDamnGood
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2010
- Messages
- 441
- Reaction score
- 0
I would say calls for boycotts of Japanese goods in China have not been very successfully. Why?
Well, its not that Chinese don't or cannot grasp psychology but in certain areas, their understanding of psychology is quite unsophisticated. To be surprised that Taiwanese would be defiant after shootings missiles overhead is such an example. China after is still a developing country. Big but still very much a work in progress. Other manifestations of poor grasp of psychology can be seen in marketing by indigenous corporations, poor effectiveness of state PR, etc.
Now to learn how to sustain a boycott, we shall use an excellent "recent" example.
Buy British Last Policy from Dictionary of the Modern Politics of South-East Asia | BookRags.com
The Buy British Last campaign in Malaysia.
The former Malaysia’s prime minister, Dr Mahathir Mohamad is a very shrewd man. Besides being legendary for implementing capital controls, he crafted a boycott scheme that would be easy to psychologically sustain by the average man or woman in the street.
‘We will buy British when it is absolutely necessary, when your prices and services are way ahead, but otherwise I think we will show a definite preference for non-British sources."
It was sustained effectively for over a year.
Why is this boycott protocol more effective?
1. Does not cut off your nose to spite the other situations which will cause one to drop out of the campaign.
2. A person may chose to partially boycott Japanese goods and still remain in psychological cohesion with the campaign and hence will remain consistent with it longer.
3. Allows for lapses by someone who is seeking to personally implement a more aggressive boycott to remain in psychological cohesion with the campaign after a lapse occurs and hence remain in the campaign longer.
4. It does not feel like one is being "feng". Some people enjoy the "feng" feeling but most don't. Being 'qin' is important but so is being NOT 'feng'.
There's a smart way to do things and there is dumb way to do things. And so far, the dumb way has been chosen. Hopefully, this will be disseminated widely and the smart way will come to prevail.
And off course, it can be applied to South Korean products too.
***
I welcome any questioning or corrections to my statements if they can be shown to be wrong with evidence.
Well, its not that Chinese don't or cannot grasp psychology but in certain areas, their understanding of psychology is quite unsophisticated. To be surprised that Taiwanese would be defiant after shootings missiles overhead is such an example. China after is still a developing country. Big but still very much a work in progress. Other manifestations of poor grasp of psychology can be seen in marketing by indigenous corporations, poor effectiveness of state PR, etc.
Now to learn how to sustain a boycott, we shall use an excellent "recent" example.
Buy British Last Policy from Dictionary of the Modern Politics of South-East Asia | BookRags.com
The Buy British Last campaign in Malaysia.
The former Malaysia’s prime minister, Dr Mahathir Mohamad is a very shrewd man. Besides being legendary for implementing capital controls, he crafted a boycott scheme that would be easy to psychologically sustain by the average man or woman in the street.
‘We will buy British when it is absolutely necessary, when your prices and services are way ahead, but otherwise I think we will show a definite preference for non-British sources."
It was sustained effectively for over a year.
Why is this boycott protocol more effective?
1. Does not cut off your nose to spite the other situations which will cause one to drop out of the campaign.
2. A person may chose to partially boycott Japanese goods and still remain in psychological cohesion with the campaign and hence will remain consistent with it longer.
3. Allows for lapses by someone who is seeking to personally implement a more aggressive boycott to remain in psychological cohesion with the campaign after a lapse occurs and hence remain in the campaign longer.
4. It does not feel like one is being "feng". Some people enjoy the "feng" feeling but most don't. Being 'qin' is important but so is being NOT 'feng'.
There's a smart way to do things and there is dumb way to do things. And so far, the dumb way has been chosen. Hopefully, this will be disseminated widely and the smart way will come to prevail.
And off course, it can be applied to South Korean products too.
***
I welcome any questioning or corrections to my statements if they can be shown to be wrong with evidence.