How Pakistan helped India during 1962 war with China

[asad71]

Very True !




It was Muslim King from Bangladesh who brought british to India & it was hindus who liberated your land from british & also from west Pakistanis.

Liberators of Bangladesh will be ashamed of their lives & struggle to see how you people forgot your history.

1. I recommend you read the real history rather than the tainted one produced under the Christian Church and British rulers.

2. The conspiracy for the defeat at Pallassy was hatched by banya Jagath Seth, Umi Chand & co who had defalcated Nawab's funds as royal treasurers. This graft had been detected during the last days of Nawab Alivardi Khan.The High Moral Ground for the traitors was provided by the Brahmin priests of Bengal-Bihar-Orissa under the Chief Purohit of Bardawan who sought weakening of Muslim power.

3. The 1971 War which we call The Liberation War was fought by us. We died, fled, suffered and sacrificed in this fratricidal war, which in reality was a war of separation or a civil war. It was a BD-Pak war in the East. India barged in at the last moment (22 Nov) to steal victory from us. Yes, if India had not come in the war could have lasted a few more months. But we know Pakistani leaders were making frantic efforts through the Shah of Iran, USA and even Lebanese PM to come to some terms with us. But India had successfully barred any foreign diplomatic contact with our leadership.

4. In E Bengal/BD, pre 1971, during the war and post war, India has relentlessly pursued a policy of proving the Two Nation Theory wrong. This theory was born at Dhaka, and unfortunately for India, the theory very much lives. We are a nation of Bengalee Muslims.

 

[ajtr]

India campaigned for a UN security council seat for pakistan.. although your khalistan movement claims need links to prove... mine needs none. Its a fact.

Does that campaign was of any use to get elected to the insignificant non-permanent seat of the UNSC.But then Pakistan's did help out by abstaining at Iaea to make it easier for india to get the civil nuke deal. And regarding Benazir bhutto's help regarding stamping khalistan movement is no secret even B.raman and KPS gill chad confirmed that help in various TV intervies in 1990s itself.Her good rapport with rajiv gandhi and her help to india was said to be one main reason she was sacked by president gulam ishaq khan.

 

[kumarkumar1867]

1. I recommend you read the real history rather than the tainted one produced under the Christian Church and British rulers.

2. The conspiracy for the defeat at Pallassy was hatched by banya Jagath Seth, Umi Chand & co who had defalcated Nawab's funds as royal treasurers. This graft had been detected during the last days of Nawab Alivardi Khan.The High Moral Ground for the traitors was provided by the Brahmin priests of Bengal-Bihar-Orissa under the Chief Purohit of Bardawan who sought weakening of Muslim power.

Sir, Problem with you peoples is you only take the sources that favour your opinion as credible.I have many pro-hindu books & author's article uttering same BS against muslims like anti hindu BS you have shown in above comment.

It must be well understood that there must be some reason why British started East India company in Muslim majority Bengal. Mir Jafar whose lust for rule helped British to plant their foot on Indian soil was architect of slaughter of bengal army in battle of plassey was not a brahman.

3. The 1971 War which we call The Liberation War was fought by us. We died, fled, suffered and sacrificed in this fratricidal war, which in reality was a war of separation or a civil war. It was a BD-Pak war in the East. India barged in at the last moment (22 Nov) to steal victory from us. Yes, if India had not come in the war could have lasted a few more months. But we know Pakistani leaders were making frantic efforts through the Shah of Iran, USA and even Lebanese PM to come to some terms with us. But India had successfully barred any foreign diplomatic contact with our leadership.

4. In E Bengal/BD, pre 1971, during the war and post war, India has relentlessly pursued a policy of proving the Two Nation Theory wrong. This theory was born at Dhaka, and unfortunately for India, the theory very much lives. We are a nation of Bengalee Muslims.

Read History, though B'Deshi hindus & muslims were getting butchered/raped since several months,India came into action only when West Pakistan/Pakistan started air-strikes on our national assets well inside our eastern borders.

If we are attacked on our soils as a sovereign nation war is a best reply we can give.

Also We never take credit of 1971 victory from Bangladesh, it was your win , we just supported it & we are happy that Bangladesh Exists, its better to have bengali muslim nation on one border than East & West Pakistan on both sides.

 

[xyxmt]

No one touch him!!, he is mine

 

[timetravel]

CD wont talk about 62 anymore... it is China and its greed and interference in Indian sovereignty and back stabbing and double talk of signing panchsheel and making roads in Akshai Chin and doing incursions in laddak which led to war...

greed of chinese and the lies of ccp puppets..

 

[ghauri05]

In 1961/62, the all weather friendship between China and Pakistan had not begun.

There are threads/posts in this forum which detailed as to how Pakistan was afraid that if China managed to take India out then Pakistan would be the next Chinese target.

It was this fear alone that the Pakistanis were hoping that international powers would help India hold off against China.

Pak-china friendship had started since 1949. today world only talks about china helping pakistan but they never talk about pakistan helping china. when china was isolated it was pakistan who helped china diplomatically on all fronts including UN. So it shows that both countries were enjoying friendship long ago and your comment is just baseless.

 

[Markus]

Pak-china friendship had started since 1949. today world only talks about china helping pakistan but they never talk about pakistan helping china. when china was isolated it was pakistan who helped china diplomatically on all fronts including UN. So it shows that both countries were enjoying friendship long ago and your comment is just baseless.

Your knowledge is limited you need to read more.

There are lot many threads/posts on this topic, but you will need to search them!

 

[peep]

Does that campaign was of any use to get elected to the insignificant non-permanent seat of the UNSC.But then Pakistan's did help out by abstaining at Iaea to make it easier for india to get the civil nuke deal. And regarding Benazir bhutto's help regarding stamping khalistan movement is no secret even B.raman and KPS gill chad confirmed that help in various TV intervies in 1990s itself.Her good rapport with rajiv gandhi and her help to india was said to be one main reason she was sacked by president gulam ishaq khan.

Firstly, if it is so useless why put your candidature ? There were many candidates who had a strong case but ultimately pak won..

Secondly, what ur implying is, by not back stabbing us in civil nuke deal u thanked us ? wow

The lots of you are totally despicable and worst people I have ever known..

 

[Darth Vader]

Where did Sonia Gandhi came from In 1971 as PM of India, she is still not Pm, neither will be.

On topic- It was just a gesture by Pakistani hukumat, not the real help, why we are making it a big issue in 2012?

Ms. Zahara made the following statement " following the fall of Dhaka Mrs. Indira Gandhi came running down like a school girl and said we have avenged one thousand years of Muslim rule" Ms. Zahara said that she was watching a BBC documentary about Bangladesh and the secretary of Mrs. Gandhi said that in a interview.

 

[ghauri05]

Your knowledge is limited you need to read more.

There are lot many threads/posts on this topic, but you will need to search them!

So plz help me enhancing my knowledge and share your views

 

[Sashan]

So plz help me enhancing my knowledge and share your views

Read the snippet from the link below -


Soon after Ayub Khan's political ascendancy in 1958, some specific developments had been taking shape during 1959-62. For instance, Communist China had demonstrated rapid advancement in the decade of 1950s, which enabled that emerging Communist giant to challenge India in a border conflict over Tibet in 1959. Interestingly, the fear of Communism in Pakistan, which had subsided after the death of Marshal Stalin of USSR, was revived. China now appeared to be a potential Communist giant making headway with relatively three times more power than India. Although Pakistan was not the direct target, it got the hint and wanted to take necessary precautions, tactfully and carefully, to evade the revised charge of allowing Cold War in the region.



Therefore, the choice for it at that time was to prevent the Communist onslaught of any denomination in the subcontinent. Feeling the commonality of threat, Pakistan wanted help from neighbouring India, the immediate target of China. President Ayub Khan offered a joint Indo-Pakistan defence pact to Prime Minister Nehru to contain the 'danger from the North'. But the latter preferred to turn it down on the plea that, as long as Pakistan was allied to the West,


The Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad.

 

[ramu]

considering the indian attitude after that(62) in 1971 & even now, I thought Pakistan should not help india instead she should attack india (just like indians take advantage of east Pakistan situation) in 62.

Between 62 and 71 is the 65 ! People just forget numbers.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Read the snippet from the link below -


Soon after Ayub Khan's political ascendancy in 1958, some specific developments had been taking shape during 1959-62. For instance, Communist China had demonstrated rapid advancement in the decade of 1950s, which enabled that emerging Communist giant to challenge India in a border conflict over Tibet in 1959. Interestingly, the fear of Communism in Pakistan, which had subsided after the death of Marshal Stalin of USSR, was revived. China now appeared to be a potential Communist giant making headway with relatively three times more power than India. Although Pakistan was not the direct target, it got the hint and wanted to take necessary precautions, tactfully and carefully, to evade the revised charge of allowing Cold War in the region.

What the Hell?

In the 1960's, India actually had a HIGHER GDP per capita than China did.

So how on Earth do they say China was three times more powerful than India back then?

Today, yes (now it is four times). Back then, no.

 

[Sashan]

What the Hell?

In the 1960's, India actually had a HIGHER GDP per capita than China did.

So how on Earth do they say China was three times more powerful than India back then?

Today, yes (now it is four times). Back then, no.

If GDP per capita is a measure of power, then Botswana today is much more powerful than China or Russia or India or Pakistan.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

If GDP per capita is a measure of power, then Botswana today is much more powerful than China or Russia or India or Pakistan.

When two populations are nearly the same, then GDP per capita is a pretty good measure of relative power, since in that case it relates directly to total GDP, which is linked to defence spending and diplomatic influence.

i've tried explaining this before, but his chinese iq renders him incapable. so dont bother

Read the above explanation, and discover why Indians came the LAST in the world in the global OECD Pisa educational tests.

By mentioning GDP per capita between two countries of similar populations, I was obviously directly referencing total GDP.