Muslims travel without such need in America once permitted entry. Christian missionaries do so at their own risk all over the world. Their risks incurred are commonly known and well-documented for their work.
The fact that Christian missionaries need to preach whilst hiding behind an army proves how despised they really are.
Do you really wish to contend that two missionaries on a reality show spending two days with a U.S. Army Nat'l Guard unit from Oklahoma while in Afghanistan constitutes the determined policy of the U.S. military? Or an ad hoc christian bible-study group at Bagram AFB and their amateurish agenda?
You can downplay it all you want,the reality is somewhat different,you people have a problem,a big problem within your military.You have militant Christians with a huge amount of influence in the US army and you sit there and deny it.If this was happening in a Muslim country you would be up in arms.When you have subjects like "God's basic training" run by organisations such as the "campus crusade For Christ" and you still cannot come to accept this fact your hypocrisy becomes clear for all to see.
You'll be hard-pressed to prove such. Scowcroft, for all of his wizened age, called matters succinctly here. There is no determined policy on the part of the U.S. government, it's elected and appointed representatives, nor its military to proselytize the Christian word to muslims. The foreign policy of the U.S. gov't nowhere indicates such an objective. Finally, neither our laws nor religious history suggest a basis for envisioning such end-goals.
Even if such coercion and harassment is not official policy that does not mean that it is not happening on an mass scale.
Then go with God in the comfort of his word and reflect such certainty and serenity. If you have nothing to fear, there is no concern. Your hysteria, however, seems to belie any such faith in your doctrine.
Well I'm sure you would rather everyone buries their head in the sand and pretends there isn't a problem but n the real world that isn't going to happen.Me highlighting the problem shouldn't be cause for concern/fear for you if as you say there is no real problem.
I have none. I'm catholic. Christian evangelicals are antithetical to our catechism. Your fundo buddies would be more appropriate witness to such.
Well maybe I should have referred to them as your colleagues if you do not consider them your friends
Perhaps. No doubt you'd be comfortable with that methodology if not the end-goal.
You cant blame me for this problem that exists within your own ranks as much as you'd like to
I never threaten what I can't personally implement. Bad form. Without question, though, a fervant wish.
The assertion on your part that you assume you can carry out your threat takes nothing away from the fact that it remains a cheap threat all the same.
What you've presented is propaganda. It's suggestive and insinuating but not seriously substantive to a culture as religiously diverse as America's. If you wish to make your case, you'll need considerably more ammunition where it matters most- legislation, court decisions, and executive policy-making.
Like I said I never proposed that evangelism was the policy of the US government,that is just your pathetic attempt to divert the issue, the facts are on display in the documentary clearly for all to see.
I see nothing of the sort to date. Can you improve upon that?
Instead of accepting that there is a problem and that it does exist, you have chosen to build a straw man and then proceed to knock it down in a vain attempt to deny the reality of the situation.