Martian2
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2009
- Messages
- 5,809
- Reaction score
- -37
I think there is a simple answer to the question as to why we are only seeing world-class infrastructure in China and not other developing countries.
China is really two countries in one. As previously mentioned, western and rural China are poor and have a low per-capita GDP. However, the eastern seaboard and southern coast of China are wealthy, technologically advanced, and have a population of over 300 million. Essentially, eastern China (with a population equivalent to the United States) is on a par with the West (i.e. manufactures world's-fastest 380 kph high-speed trains, 300,000-ton oil supertankers, world's most-powerful supercomputer, capable of performing Chinese spacewalk, etc.)
Other developing countries lack the advanced portion that China possesses. Without all of eastern China's advanced technologies, China would not have its world-class infrastructure.
Let's examine the different methods that are available and weigh their likelihood in achieving world-class infrastructure for a developing country.
Firstly, hiring Western contractors is beyond the reach of almost all developing countries (with the possible exception of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait). $2.54 billion per mile of subway is too expensive. Since the equipment has to be transported to a developing country and accommodations built to house the Western skilled labor, the cost will far exceed $2.54 billion per subway mile.
Secondly, buying Western equipment presents the same issue of unimaginable costs. Western equipment is really expensive. Also, without the Western engineers and technicians, the Western equipment will lie useless. In other words, a developing country does not possess the expertise to operate complex and sophisticated construction equipment.
Thirdly, in theory, a developing country can follow the China strategy of developing the technology and building it yourself. However, there is no guarantee that a developing country will experience China's success. The Chinese can conduct a spacewalk, but that doesn't mean a developing country can too.
If a developing country cannot employ Western technology or develop its own, what are the choices?
I think the only choice is to employ Chinese technology. Chinese technology has been proven to work (e.g. world's-largest Three Gorges Dam) and it's affordable. The Chinese government provides financing through its Export-Import Bank of China (i.e. China Eximbank).
To shine more light on the discussion regarding world-class infrastructure and its apparent China-only widespread appearance, I submit the following posts:
1. Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility Opens to Science Researchers
Though large-scale construction equipment and technology may appear advanced, building a synchrotron is far more difficult. If China can build an advanced synchrotron, construction technology is relatively simple in comparison.
2. Three Gorges Dam generates the electricity of 21 Hoover Dams
China's infrastructure technology is second-to-none. China's Three Gorges Dam is truly advanced. It produces the power of 21 Hoover Dams.
3. Hydro superpower China has "the world's largest hydropower capacity"
China is a master of different types of advanced construction technology. "The 958 ft. (or 292m) Xiaowan dam is the world's highest hyperbolic arch dam; as high as the Eiffel Tower." In contrast, the Three Gorges Dam is a concrete gravity dam.
4. Sudan hails world's longest dam
The building of a single Chinese dam in a developing country, such as Sudan, can have an incredible impact. It can immediately triple a country's power supply. "The 9.7-km dam is the longest one in the world with a total capacity of 1.25 million kilowatt, twice as much as Sudan's existing power supply."
"He said that the dam's eight 350-ton super cranes, dubbed "Gate Machine" in their jargon, were all shipped from China."
5. Sudanese-Chinese Friendship Bridge spans over Nile River
Countries that are friendly to China may qualify for large-scale infrastructure at "friendship" prices. A Chinese friendship-bridge across the Nile River cost Sudan a mere $20 million.
China is really two countries in one. As previously mentioned, western and rural China are poor and have a low per-capita GDP. However, the eastern seaboard and southern coast of China are wealthy, technologically advanced, and have a population of over 300 million. Essentially, eastern China (with a population equivalent to the United States) is on a par with the West (i.e. manufactures world's-fastest 380 kph high-speed trains, 300,000-ton oil supertankers, world's most-powerful supercomputer, capable of performing Chinese spacewalk, etc.)
Other developing countries lack the advanced portion that China possesses. Without all of eastern China's advanced technologies, China would not have its world-class infrastructure.
Let's examine the different methods that are available and weigh their likelihood in achieving world-class infrastructure for a developing country.
Firstly, hiring Western contractors is beyond the reach of almost all developing countries (with the possible exception of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait). $2.54 billion per mile of subway is too expensive. Since the equipment has to be transported to a developing country and accommodations built to house the Western skilled labor, the cost will far exceed $2.54 billion per subway mile.
Secondly, buying Western equipment presents the same issue of unimaginable costs. Western equipment is really expensive. Also, without the Western engineers and technicians, the Western equipment will lie useless. In other words, a developing country does not possess the expertise to operate complex and sophisticated construction equipment.
Thirdly, in theory, a developing country can follow the China strategy of developing the technology and building it yourself. However, there is no guarantee that a developing country will experience China's success. The Chinese can conduct a spacewalk, but that doesn't mean a developing country can too.
If a developing country cannot employ Western technology or develop its own, what are the choices?
I think the only choice is to employ Chinese technology. Chinese technology has been proven to work (e.g. world's-largest Three Gorges Dam) and it's affordable. The Chinese government provides financing through its Export-Import Bank of China (i.e. China Eximbank).
To shine more light on the discussion regarding world-class infrastructure and its apparent China-only widespread appearance, I submit the following posts:
1. Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility Opens to Science Researchers
Though large-scale construction equipment and technology may appear advanced, building a synchrotron is far more difficult. If China can build an advanced synchrotron, construction technology is relatively simple in comparison.
2. Three Gorges Dam generates the electricity of 21 Hoover Dams
China's infrastructure technology is second-to-none. China's Three Gorges Dam is truly advanced. It produces the power of 21 Hoover Dams.
3. Hydro superpower China has "the world's largest hydropower capacity"
China is a master of different types of advanced construction technology. "The 958 ft. (or 292m) Xiaowan dam is the world's highest hyperbolic arch dam; as high as the Eiffel Tower." In contrast, the Three Gorges Dam is a concrete gravity dam.
4. Sudan hails world's longest dam
The building of a single Chinese dam in a developing country, such as Sudan, can have an incredible impact. It can immediately triple a country's power supply. "The 9.7-km dam is the longest one in the world with a total capacity of 1.25 million kilowatt, twice as much as Sudan's existing power supply."
"He said that the dam's eight 350-ton super cranes, dubbed "Gate Machine" in their jargon, were all shipped from China."
5. Sudanese-Chinese Friendship Bridge spans over Nile River
Countries that are friendly to China may qualify for large-scale infrastructure at "friendship" prices. A Chinese friendship-bridge across the Nile River cost Sudan a mere $20 million.
Last edited: