What's new

How Benazir Betrayed Khalistan movement

How did Pakistan have the list of khalistani operatives, if it wasn't funding them and training them in the first place?

Just like you are worried for Balochistan, we were worried about Khalistan.

Don't act so innocent.

.. and whose failure is that, if a corrupt limited term PM is able to shake the security establishment without ringing alarm bells. You get the idea.
The PM has a lot of powers. This isn't Ayub Khan's time where the military can veto decisions ad hoc.

If it does then bastards like ex CJ Iftikhar take out bogus long marches.
 
.
How did Pakistan have the list of khalistani operatives, if it wasn't funding them and training them in the first place?

You think only Indians can train? ISI trained mujaheddin brought down the mighty soviets.
 
. .
That's why I say the army mustn't overtly do anything to PPP. If Zia had not arrested Bhutto, the fucker would have grown so unpopular that people would have killed him themselves like Mujib ur Rahman. By hanging him they made him aaj bhi Bhutto zinda hai.

Let PPP wreck the **** out of Sindh. It is impossible for them to win a national election ever again. Let them grow so unpopular in Sindh that the people throw them out themselves. If the army interferes,it will again give PPP the chance to play the martyr card

In the meanwhile army needs to support alternate parties in interior Sindh. PPP will get so unpopular people will kick Billo Rani out themselves
Calm down Bath Island Basher :lol:


Nobody can beat PPP in interior Sindh till a Bhutto (even fake one) is alive. That is the unfortunate reality.
 
.
What many Pakistanis dont get is that the sikhs might have had a ambiguous relationship with the Indian state but they were never a marginalized community. They understand Indian politics and culture because they have always been a major part of it.
Some WhatsApp msgs sent by them on muslim community are too offensive for me as a moderate. SOME of them are like the hindu jihadists we dont like.
Khalistan movement failed because the khalistanis were killing 90 % sikhs , who didn't agree with them.Most sikhs were never for a independent country and the movement was purely political.
I feel the recent success by security forces in kashmir are also a result of the local Kashmiri turning his back on the targed killing of local Muslim cops in cold blood last year by the terrorists.
 
.
Calm down Bath Island Basher :lol:


Nobody can beat PPP in interior Sindh till a Bhutto (even fake one) is alive. That is the unfortunate reality.


Billo Rani does not have the charisma to hold Sindh. Feudals are only with him for their own stake. Give them an alternative and they'll drop him. It's an open secret that Billo is gay
 
.
What many Pakistanis dont get is that the sikhs might have had a ambiguous relationship with the Indian state but they were never a marginalized community. They understand Indian politics and culture because they have always been a major part of it.
Some WhatsApp msgs sent by them on muslim community are too offensive for me as a moderate. SOME of them are like the hindu jihadists we dont like.
Khalistan movement failed because the khalistanis were killing 90 % sikhs , who didn't agree with them.Most sikhs were never for a independent country and the movement was purely political.
I feel the recent success by security forces in kashmir are also a result of the local Kashmiri turning his back on the targed killing of local Muslim cops in cold blood last year by the terrorists.

Who cares whether Kahlistanis win or lose. The goal is to get Hindus and Sikhs fight each other. Either way Muslims win.
 
.
Just like you are worried for Balochistan, we were worried about Khalistan.

Don't act so innocent.

So basically you are saying, we are justified in supporting secession of Balochistan, because often Pakistanis here give an excuse, that since Kashmir is disputed territory, supporting there terror activities is justified, but they would not support any other terror outfit.
 
.
Who cares whether Kahlistanis win or lose. The goal is to get Hindus and Sikhs fight each other. Either way Muslims win.
Aim should be for everyone to get along so money wasted on defense can be diverted to productive endeavors . Your assumption that sikhs will be friendly to Pakistan is misplaced. Go to any gurudwara and listen to the sermons. A large part are devoted to the atrocities Sikhs faced at the hands of muslims.
 
. .
Aim should be for everyone to get along so money wasted on defense can be diverted to productive endeavors . Your assumption that sikhs will be friendly to Pakistan is misplaced. Go to any gurudwara and listen to the sermons. A large part are devoted to the atrocities Sikhs faced at the hands of muslims.

You can live in your cuckoo land. Khalistan is alive and kicking.
 
. .
The PM has a lot of powers. This isn't Ayub Khan's time where the military can veto decisions ad hoc.

If it does then bastards like ex CJ Iftikhar take out bogus long marches.
Security guard establishment is not just military, it’s a whole setup of Intelligence, military, Judiciary and some Vetted politicians n media personal. Where intel and military make the backbone. Western countries, you cannot become ministers of establishment things you can be security risk.
 
.
Stop picking on the poor Bhuttos.

They have not done anything less than every other feudal society would not advocate for.

Just survive !!!!!!
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom