What's new

How Bangladesh lags behind India in RMG Industry?

Loafer

BANNED
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
962
Reaction score
-48
Country
India
Location
India
The good old days of rising Bangla tiger:

The rise of Bangladesh's garment export industry has been nothing less than spectacular. Until recently it appeared that nothing could stop Bangladesh: not the Tazreen fire, not the Rana Plaza building collapse, not terrible working conditions – and certainly not the lowest wage rates in Asia. It was as if US and EU importers were addicted to made-in-Bangladesh garments and nothing could stop the need to buy. By 2015 Bangladesh garment exports were second only to China.

Here we see how Bangladeshi labour struggles to compete with Indian specialisation and Vietnamese linear production.

If indeed made-in-Bangladesh garments have become less competitive, I suggest the gap between Bangladesh and its competitors is not because Bangladesh has moved backwards, but rather that its competitors have moved forward.

Most of us recognise that the global garment industry is operating in a technological world where, in order to compete, factories require first-class engineers to increase productivity and specialists to enable them to provide important services.

For example, India faces many of the same problems as Bangladesh, but Indian garment factories have become service providers. In this regard, India has the best product development facilities in Asia. Whatever India's other problems, the importer knows the made-in-India product will have design integrity – the garment will look like the sample and the sample will look like the designer's original sketch. As a result, India has become the place to make complex fashion, and for this service alone the importer will pay a premium price.

Vietnam has indeed become a second China. The country has developed first-class education and training facilities turning out excellent managers and merchandisers. It is moving ahead to develop speed-to-market. Vietnam has become a leader in sustainable production. In short Vietnam has become one of the easiest places in which to work. The factories understand customer needs and have developed the facilities to meet those needs.

Against this, what does Bangladesh offer? Cheap overworked labour!

The problem is not moral. Bangladesh has the same problems as any failing company and/or industry: poor management.

Forcing a sewer to work 14 hours per day, 7 days per week does not make sense. Productivity falls. Quality falls. Worker attrition rises.

If you want your factory to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week that is not a problem. Capital-intensive industries such as spinning work 24-7. The answer is simple: three 10-hour shifts. Production rises. Productivity rises. Quality levels remain high.

Many operations must per-force operate 24-7: hospitals, police and fire departments, just to name a few. Their answer is a simple and well established 4x4x4 in which four teams each work a 12-hour shift, four days a week. These operations would fall apart if they forced their staff to work in Bangladesh-type conditions.

Today, we have the means to meet the needs of industry reasonably, safely and without losing productivity, reducing quality or reliability. If Bangladesh management brought in qualified engineers they could move from excessive overtime to reasonable working hours, increase productivity and wages and move into the 21st century.

https://www.just-style.com/comment/a-tale-of-three-countries-vietnam-india-bangladesh_id131188.aspx

@Nilgiri @gslv mk3
What we have saying so far is turning out to be truth on ground.
 
.
Yup - this is the end.

Bangladesh Exports keep on rising while Vietnam and India slowing down. See the other thread in this forum.

Sure looks like a death spiral....:lol:

Jokes aside and from what I have heard Indian garments factories are mostly smaller urban units, or are they?
 
Last edited:
.
Three charts show how the Indian textile industry lost the race to Bangladesh and Vietnam
Will the special package for the sector facing both external and internal pressures in a competitive market be enough to revive it?
sfiwyvgubi-1466933256.jpg

Adnan Abidi/Reuters
Mayank Jain

To clothe a billion people ought to be reason by itself to ensure a thriving industry. Traditionally, India’s textile sector not only employed millions of people directly but also gave the country the lion’s share in global trade.

However, things have changed in recent years. India’s apparel industry is in tatters. Textiles mills are shutting down. New jobs aren’t being created because exports are not growing. And countries such as Bangladesh and Vietnam have convincingly left India behind in their race to the top.

This is what prompted the Narendra Modi government to unveil a special package for the sector last week. It is expected to create one crore new jobs over the next three years and bring in an additional investment of Rs 74,000 crore.

The new measures overhaul labour laws, allowing workers to do overtime of eight hours per week and provide additional subsidy for garment manufacturers to upgrade technology and expand industries.

Industry bodies and experts have hailed the initiative, calling it a “comprehensive” package that addresses the industry's needs and hope is being expressed that India will be able to regain some of its lost competitiveness.

But, it’s still worth examining how the Indian textiles industry ended up where it is right now.

India’s textile exports declined marginally last year to $36.26 billion from $37.14 billion recorded in the year 2014-'15. In apparel, Bangladesh’s exports to the US grew by a whopping 12% in 2015 while Vietnam did even better as its exports rose by 14%. India, on the other hand, saw its exports grow just by 8%.

The presentation put out by the Indian government on the announcement of the package also acknowledged this state of affairs. The Ministry of Textiles said that Bangladesh and Vietnam have surpassed India’s apparel exports and the country is the smallest exporter among these three economies.

ebfsvrlknl-1467107335.jpg

Competitive neighbour

The chart above shows apparel exports from Bangladesh surpassed India in the year 2003 and Vietnam left India behind in 2011. Since then, both these countries have cut into India’s pie as a preferred manufacturer of clothing, while India’s exports have languished. A recent piece on Rediff.com attributed this fall to the greater competitiveness in factories of Bangladesh.

“India’s garment factories are too small; they typically have 150 people and about 80 machines,” a businessman in the apparel sourcing business told the website. “The average factory in Bangladesh has 600 people.”

While China’s dominance in the trade has been on the wane due to rising labour costs, India has been facing a peculiar problem of trying to expand the scope of its industries.

“With China’s textile sector slowing down, countries like Russia, which were completely dependent on China have left a vacuum. Indian companies can take advantage of this,” Textile secretary Rashmi Verma told the Hindu.

However, this is not going to be easy with countries such as Bangladesh offering cheaper alternatives.

“We are facing some teething problems, but it will be cleared soon. We are also concerned about reverse FDI [Foreign Direct Investment] as some of the big players are moving to countries like Ethiopia, Vietnam and Bangladesh to set up units,” she added.

With the new policy, the government is trying to give additional incentives to both workers and the business owners to balance the value chain so that the industry can achieve its potential.

For those employees who work at the lowest rung of the ladder, the government will provide more money in their provident fund accounts while also making the Employee Provident Fund optional to employees who earn less than Rs 15,000 a month in order to provide them with more money to spend. For industries, the government is providing tax incentives and funds through loans and subsidies to speed up the process of industrial expansion.

Where's the money?

A key part of it is the additional subsidy provided under the Amended Technological Upgradation Funds Scheme. This scheme provides one-time incentive to business owners looking to scale up their ventures by investing in technology or generating employment. Under the new norms, the subsidy has been increased from 10% to 25% and it will only be provided after the “expected jobs” are created.

To clothe a billion people ought to be reason by itself to ensure a thriving industry. Traditionally, India’s textile sector not only employed millions of people directly but also gave the country the lion’s share in global trade.

However, things have changed in recent years. India’s apparel industry is in tatters. Textiles mills are shutting down. New jobs aren’t being created because exports are not growing. And countries such as Bangladesh and Vietnam have convincingly left India behind in their race to the top.

This is what prompted the Narendra Modi government to unveil a special package for the sector last week. It is expected to create one crore new jobs over the next three years and bring in an additional investment of Rs 74,000 crore.

The new measures overhaul labour laws, allowing workers to do overtime of eight hours per week and provide additional subsidy for garment manufacturers to upgrade technology and expand industries.

Industry bodies and experts have hailed the initiative, calling it a “comprehensive” package that addresses the industry's needs and hope is being expressed that India will be able to regain some of its lost competitiveness.

But, it’s still worth examining how the Indian textiles industry ended up where it is right now.

India’s textile exports declined marginally last year to $36.26 billion from $37.14 billion recorded in the year 2014-'15. In apparel, Bangladesh’s exports to the US grew by a whopping 12% in 2015 while Vietnam did even better as its exports rose by 14%. India, on the other hand, saw its exports grow just by 8%.

The presentation put out by the Indian government on the announcement of the package also acknowledged this state of affairs. The Ministry of Textiles said that Bangladesh and Vietnam have surpassed India’s apparel exports and the country is the smallest exporter among these three economies.

ebfsvrlknl-1467107335.jpg

Competitive neighbour

The chart above shows apparel exports from Bangladesh surpassed India in the year 2003 and Vietnam left India behind in 2011. Since then, both these countries have cut into India’s pie as a preferred manufacturer of clothing, while India’s exports have languished. A recent piece on Rediff.com attributed this fall to the greater competitiveness in factories of Bangladesh.

“India’s garment factories are too small; they typically have 150 people and about 80 machines,” a businessman in the apparel sourcing business told the website. “The average factory in Bangladesh has 600 people.”

While China’s dominance in the trade has been on the wane due to rising labour costs, India has been facing a peculiar problem of trying to expand the scope of its industries.

“With China’s textile sector slowing down, countries like Russia, which were completely dependent on China have left a vacuum. Indian companies can take advantage of this,” Textile secretary Rashmi Verma told the Hindu.

However, this is not going to be easy with countries such as Bangladesh offering cheaper alternatives.

“We are facing some teething problems, but it will be cleared soon. We are also concerned about reverse FDI [Foreign Direct Investment] as some of the big players are moving to countries like Ethiopia, Vietnam and Bangladesh to set up units,” she added.

With the new policy, the government is trying to give additional incentives to both workers and the business owners to balance the value chain so that the industry can achieve its potential.

For those employees who work at the lowest rung of the ladder, the government will provide more money in their provident fund accounts while also making the Employee Provident Fund optional to employees who earn less than Rs 15,000 a month in order to provide them with more money to spend. For industries, the government is providing tax incentives and funds through loans and subsidies to speed up the process of industrial expansion.

Where's the money?

A key part of it is the additional subsidy provided under the Amended Technological Upgradation Funds Scheme. This scheme provides one-time incentive to business owners looking to scale up their ventures by investing in technology or generating employment. Under the new norms, the subsidy has been increased from 10% to 25% and it will only be provided after the “expected jobs” are created.

yxanplttle-1467107428.jpg

The chart above shows how the funds provided through the current and previous schemes by the ministry have dwindled over the years. The current scheme will involve an annual expenditure of Rs 400-500 crore according to the ministry estimates and it is expected to generate 12.25 lakh jobs and additional exports of $7 billion.

Even as the current package seeks to revive the sector through broad range reforms, problems persist. Last week, textile mills in Telangana decided to shut down twice a week in protest, taking a cue from Tamil Nadu to highlight their problems.

Andhra Pradesh is also reportedly set to follow suit as mill owners complain of eroding profits because of raw cotton stocks being allegedly hoarded by large corporations and imports having become expensive because of added duties and taxes.

reomsxgnce-1467107575.jpg

Shutting down of mills further accentuates the extent of the rot facing the mill owners as the official data shows that close to 600 textile mills shut down permanently during the last year itself. That’s about two mills closing down every day – and the number of mills shutting down has been rising for the last decade. The government is yet to find out how it impacts the industry.

In 2014, the ministry told the Rajya Sabha in a written response that there has been no study yet which links the shutdown of mills to production, even though there could be a variety of reasons for the closures.

“As per the report received from Regional office of the Textile Commissioner, the main reason for closure of mills is financial problems including other reasons such as strike/labour problems, lock-out, etc,” the minister of state for textiles told the house. “There is no study in the knowledge of Government on the impact on the production of textile items due to closure of mills,” the minister said.

https://scroll.in/article/810671/th...ustry-lost-the-race-to-bangladesh-and-vietnam
 
.
https://www.businessoffashion.com/a...facturing-powerhouse-garment-textile-industry
In a July 2015 report on the textile industry by strategic advisory firm Corporate Catalyst India, the Indian textiles industry (currently valued at around $108 billion) is expected to reach $141 billion by 2021 and is the country’s second largest employer after agriculture. Over 35 million people are employed in this sector either directly or otherwise. And the Indian textile industry has the potential to grow five-fold over the next ten years to touch the $500 billion mark, of which domestic sales would constitute $315 billion and exports $185 billion.

Right now Indian Textile Industry is worth 50% of Bangadesh GDP ($200 Billion).

:lol:
 
.
.
2016 comparative figures:

Bangladesh exports $28bn RMG
india exports $18bn RMG

Bangladesh RMG export growth 6%
india RMG export growth -2%

Bangladesh GDP $247bn, maths isn't your strong point is it? Ah well, i'm sure india has a lot to teach us in this sector......


He may be talking about the total value of textiles that are produced in India. As India has 1.2 billion people and does not really import textiles then this may be the case.
 
.
The good old days of rising Bangla tiger:



Here we see how Bangladeshi labour struggles to compete with Indian specialisation and Vietnamese linear production.



https://www.just-style.com/comment/a-tale-of-three-countries-vietnam-india-bangladesh_id131188.aspx

@Nilgiri @gslv mk3
What we have saying so far is turning out to be truth on ground.

Just leave them be on RMG, it is the only thing they can do production wise given big bone has been thrown to them because they are LDC (hence the fleas BD-doggie has shed here post exports instead of total production/consumption). This is a good thing as it has stopped even more 10's of millions of their worthless butts from flooding over into India....buying time for us to improve BSF and better border control and stemming the tide with bullets when needed. India is better off focusing on continuing to diversify its industrial base and leave the LDC to hit the ceiling approaching very fast now....while the fleas bounce up and down because they no longer in the mangy doggie.
 
. .
Loafer get a life. Loser! Obsessed with Bangladesh. Slumdog Indian harami! Always trying to open anything to down Bangladesh and tries to create anything negative about Bangladesh. What a scumbag!
 
.
'too few productive capabilities to easily diversify into related products'.

What are you taking about they are plenty diverse. They make all these for $5: t-shirts, regular shirts, "dress" shirts, pants, and shorts. They are trying to tap into the beachwear market too.
 
.
Loafer get a life. Loser! Obsessed with Bangladesh. Slumdog Indian harami! Always trying to open anything to down Bangladesh and tries to create anything negative about Bangladesh. What a scumbag!

You Bdiots are shown the mirror what you are. Even in RMG you stitch exploiting womenfolk. You can't match the expertise of Indians.
 
.
You Bdiots are shown the mirror what you are. Even in RMG you stitch exploiting womenfolk. You can't match the expertise of Indians.

Those Bangladeshi RMG womenfolk (and their dependent children) are far better off than Indian women on average, as far as maternal health and education. Rate of employment for women overall in Bangladesh is higher than in India too, and they are far less exploited because they have their own income.

So which group is more exploited?


Please read,

How Bangladesh, Nepal and Vietnam beat India hollow in health indicators
A comparison on factors such as life expectancy, sanitation, child and maternal mortality, and immunization programmes
Manas Chakravarty

Polio-kkLE--621x414@LiveMint.jpg

Rate of Diphtheria polio titanus (DPT) vaccination is higher in Bangladesh compared to India

What is the point of being a world power or having a high rate of GDP growth unless a nation takes care of its people, especially its mothers and children? Photo: HT

The Lancet is apparently unhappy with the Indian government’s attitude to public health care. The government has reportedly refuted the allegations, saying that things are improving. But how does our healthcare effort compare with that of other countries? Data from the World Bank health indicators show that Bangladesh and Nepal, with per capita gross domestic product (GDP) around half of India’s, do much better on health indicators. And Vietnam, with a per capita GDP slightly less than India’s, outshines India completely. Forget The Lancet—it is the masses of India who should be unhappy with the state of our healthcare.

India’s per capita GDP in constant 2011 international dollars was $5,445 in 2014, according to the World Bank indicators, while Bangladesh’s was $2,981 and Nepal’s $2,261. The per capita income of these two countries is, therefore, around half of India’s. Vietnam’s per capita income by this measure, at $5,370, was only slightly less than India’s.

Let’s compare how these countries have performed on health indicators.

The most basic indicator of well-being is life expectancy. Column 2 shows life expectancy at birth of Indian females, at 68 years, is lower than Bangladesh’s 71 years and Nepal’s 70 years. These two much poorer South Asian countries offer a longer life to their women, compared with India. As for Vietnam, life expectancy for women there is 80, which means women can look forward to 12 more years of life there than in India.

Column 3 shows the percentage of a cohort of newborn male infants that would survive to age 65, if subject to current mortality rates. Only 63% of male Indian babies will reach 65 years of age, compared with 72% for Bangladesh and Vietnam and 69% for Nepalese male babies.

g_Capital-account_web.jpg



Column 4 shows how the Nepal and Vietnam governments devote a much larger proportion of their GDP to healthcare than India’s. Bangladesh, a much poorer nation, allots 1.3% of its GDP to public health services, the same as India.

The upshot of this stingy attitude to health is that the mortality ratio for newborn babies, for children under five years of age and for mothers are all much higher in India than in Bangladesh and Nepal, except for maternal mortality in which India equals Nepal. Communist Vietnam does far better than India. Columns 5, 6 and 7 give the details.

Column 8 shows the importance of sanitation, which has a huge bearing on health. Note that the percentage of the rural population with access to improved sanitation facilities is much lower in India than in neighbouring Bangladesh and Nepal, while Vietnam once again does much better.

And, finally, columns 9 and 10 show the coverage among children of Vitamin A supplements and DPT (diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus) immunization programmes. Once again, India comes across as the worst performer.

These numbers show that India can easily do much better, at its level of income, than it does now. Both Nepal and Bangladesh, with per capita incomes almost half of India’s, have done far more for the health of their people, particularly the health of their women and children. What’s more, India should aim at attaining Vietnam’s health indicators, rather than comparing itself with Bangladesh and Nepal. But then, Vietnam’s Communist government perhaps has a much higher commitment to its people’s health than the Indian establishment.

After all, what is the point of being a world power or having a high rate of GDP growth unless a nation takes care of its people, especially its mothers and children?

Manas Chakravarty looks at trends and issues in the financial markets. Your comments are welcome at capitalaccount@livemint.com

First Published: Mon, Oct 26 2015. 07 33 AM IST
 
.
Yay more "statistics" from an institutionally-bereft and corruption-sunk country.

It's fun looking at the population pyramid of Bangladesh to see the dissonance with BBS claimed stats, always an easy way to get a rough windage on the lies.

In other such news, North Korea now has data showing it to have better life expectancy than Switzerland!

So:

a) The world bank, UN and others will boldly go out of their way to show otherwise than whats given to them no matter the tainting/manipulation?

b) Or should we judge and factor in a country's claimed data based on its institutional capacity and corruption prevalence?...especially considering the 3rd party neutral data that does become available from time to time (like liveability index for Dhaka and the health characteristics of BD immigrants found in the developed world and the number of BD health refugees to India)
 
.
this is another idiotic thread.

1) india definitely has advantage in basic raw material of cotton, where Bangladesh depends on import.
2) in terms of yarn, finished textile Bangladesh has equal or better quality and capability NOW.
3) in terms of market access Bangladesh has better export market access where india has big and closed domestic market.
4) in design capability Bangladesh progress is dismal to say the least. inidian design is also sucks. One, shining example in design is Pakistan - both in fabric design and finished clothing - any south asian countries are miles apart from Pakistani talent and capability.
 
.
this is another idiotic thread.

1) india definitely has advantage in basic raw material of cotton, where Bangladesh depends on import.
2) in terms of yarn, finished textile Bangladesh has equal or better quality and capability NOW.
3) in terms of market access Bangladesh has better export market access where india has big and closed domestic market.
4) in design capability Bangladesh progress is dismal to say the least. inidian design is also sucks. One, shining example in design is Pakistan - both in fabric design and finished clothing - any south asian countries are miles apart from Pakistani talent and capability.

For last point, the article grossly contradicts you and infact Indian Designs are sold at a marked premium compared to discounted Bangladeshi junk.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom