What's new

Homosexuality can be called a mental disorder, Chinese court rules

do we look like animals?
we are same, maybe little more intelligent thats why we are on top of food chain
Although not related to this topic, male animals regularly kill the offspring of females they mate with, still want to use them as a benchmark?
yes maybe we humans don't kill each other but have you seen how children are treated by a 2nd wife or 2nd husband?
 
Last edited:
. .
LGBTQ phenomenon is a mutation , the most common thing in genetics.
Whether it is successful or not is natural selection.

The fact that still so many people wrestle with this is beyond me.
I guess prevalence of religion is to blame.
 
.
yes maybe we humans don't kill each other but have you seen how children are treated by a 2nd wife or 2nd husband?

I know plenty of cases where people treat their non biological offspring as their own.
They don’t slaughter on sight like many males of animal species.
The bottom line is that animals are not a great example.
 
.
Not our fight, the state should not participate in culture wars. It weakens the authority and legitimacy of the state to do get involved in subjective things.
 
.
we are same, maybe little more intelligent thats why we are on top of food chain

yes maybe we humans don't kill each other but have you seen how children are treated by a 2nd wife or 2nd husband?
Interesting parallel.

Do you not feel that 2nd spouses should simply behave better around stepchildren as a solution to the discrepancy you have correctly identified? Are we not intelligent enough to treat innocent children with dignity regardless of their DNA? Or should we revert to animalistic tendencies and do the modern day equivalent of "cannibalising" another person's offspring by ostracising them?
 
.
animals also have such tendencies. They also have mental disorder?
Yes animals also have mental disorders.
Additionally humans are complex societal animals and this mental disorder is caused more by the "nurture" than "nature"
 
. .
There is a reason the Quran forbids it.

Most homosexuals are actually p0rn addicts who have fried their brain cells watching women get b$nged by other guys from every angle in every way possible. They cannot be aroused by normal women or p0rn anymore so they turn to more degenerate things for pleasure. The brutal cycle continues and only stops when they realise what they have done, after which they will either commit suicide or live a life of severe depression, thinking about how they are a shell of their former self.

Banning p0rn is one of the few good things PTA has done. Next step is widespread sex education, especially about the effects of p0rn on your brain.
 
.
Not our fight, the state should not participate in culture wars. It weakens the authority and legitimacy of the state to do get involved in subjective things.
It does affect the state though. When a large portion of society turning homo due to a 'being cool' factor & the population goes down the drain then it's a state existence crisis. If you're not a mentally retrd then you shouldn't put your stick in someone's shit. Simple
Banning p0rn is one of the few good things PTA has done
NO
 
.
This a a step backwards for Chinese Socialism.

Egalitarian culture needs people to be treated equal, provided that they are productive and maintain social harmony.

Gay people can be as patriotic and productive as any other groups. Mental disorders should be labeled on people traveling to Japan and hoarding singing toilet seats or white worshiping fcukers buying up iPhones and Prada bags.
 
.
LGBTQ phenomenon is a mutation , the most common thing in genetics.
Whether it is successful or not is natural selection.

The fact that still so many people wrestle with this is beyond me.
I guess prevalence of religion is to blame.

Mutations are mostly bad, can become cancer. So as an intelligent specie u suggest we do something about this mutation or let it thrive?
 
. .
Mutations are mostly bad, can become cancer. So as an intelligent specie u suggest we do something about this mutation or let it thrive?
Incorrect hypothesis , mutations are change ,

Weather it is good or bad, is determined by the test that the immediate environment will put on it.

No such thing as good or bad. You can rephrase it to Better or worsen the chances of survival and propagation.

OUr mind is the result of selective mutation+congregations+symbiosis over millennia , or we would still be somewhat of an amoeba.

Savants and genius are mutations as well, would have died out in earlies environments (might not have regular street skills to navigate treachery ), thrive now.( Cognitive tradeoff hypothesis)

Mutations are self correcting , hence if it was not able to propagate , its would automatically not be able to survive.

Apply this to LGBTQ and i dont see all the fuss about it.
 
.
Incorrect hypothesis , mutations are change ,

Weather it is good or bad, is determined by the test that the immediate environment will put on it.

No such thing as good or bad. You can rephrase it to Better or worsen the chances of survival and propagation.

OUr mind is the result of selective mutation+congregations+symbiosis over millennia , or we would still be somewhat of an amoeba.

Savants and genius are mutations as well, would have died out in earlies environments (might not have regular street skills to navigate treachery ), thrive now.

Mutations are self correcting , hence if it was not able to propagate , its would automatically not be able to survive.

Apply this to LGBTQ and i dont see all the fuss about it.

So even an idiot can see the LGBTQxyz is a mutation that cannot survive or propagate. So why the western world is doing their bidding and propagating it making it "normal". In this age of information and connectivity, if u propagate something as "totally normal phenomenon", ur encouraging it, in other words propagating an unfeasible mutation. Which is wrong and dumb.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom