History Summarized: Colonial India

[Iltutmish]

New Video:

 

[El Sidd]

Son of Soil, Achakzai, say Punjabis sided with the British.

@RealNapster what does KPK curriculum state in that regard?

 

[INS_Vikrant]

British Empire is the most evil blood soaked regime in entire history.

 

[El Sidd]

British Empire is the most evil blood soaked regime in entire history.

What has India done to reverse the status quo introduced by the British?

The colonial leftovers still treat India as the golden sparrow and live the Babu Sahib life.

 

[RealNapster]

Son of Soil, Achakzai, say Punjabis sided with the British.

@RealNapster what does KPK curriculum state in that regard?

Nothing. It doesn't discuss the topic

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

What has India done to reverse the status quo introduced by the British?

The colonial leftovers still treat India as the golden sparrow and live the Babu Sahib life.

Oft quoted response, a common refrain:

During British Raj, there were famines despite lower population. Now there is no famine despite higher population.

- PRTP GWD

 

[El Sidd]

Nothing. It doesn't discuss the topic

How can it not address the topic?
Polity of Pakistan Movement cannot be distanced from Colonialism.

Oft quoted response, a common refrain:

During British Raj, there were famines despite lower population. Now there is no famine despite higher population.

- PRTP GWD

Farmers today announced hunger strike.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

Farmers today announced hunger strike.

Hunger strike is voluntary. Famine is involuntary starvation.

- PRTP GWD

 

[El Sidd]

Hunger strike is voluntary. Famine is involuntary starvation.

- PRTP GWD

You are living in famine. It's masked by the pandemic.

 

[Cherub786]

The British were a Godsend for India, particularly Punjab and the Muslims. Study the so-called freedom struggle, it was led by Brahmins and Baniyas. The first person to call for self-rule was Dayanand Saraswati, the infamous Muslim hater and founder of Arya Samaj, author of Satyarth Prakash.
Muslim League, founded in 1906, made loyalty to the British Crown its foremost principle.
Baboons like that Achakzai are clueless, brainless fools. They only care about their narrow ethnic interests, they have never identified with the Muslim cause and interests.

 

[doorstar]

British Empire is the most evil blood soaked regime in entire history.

3.5k British spice traders beat sub-continent's 50k soldiers to establish a foothold there. then you people lined up to serve and become somewhat civilized in the process.

there were never more than 30 k Britons in British India at any one time to rule over 10s of millions of you. so who do you think did the "blood-soaking"? you or the British?

Now there is no famine despite higher population.

either a biggest lie ever or a lack of knowledge. don't make me post videos of bihari and north-eastern vermin-eaters ( or tales of suicides in indian Panjab)

 

[M. Sarmad]

Son of Soil, Achakzai, say Punjabis sided with the British.

The Muslims of UP, Bihar and Bengal (British Indian Army of Bengal presidency) sided with the British in the first Anglo-Afghan war (1839-42).

The same Army helped British conquer Punjab in late 1840s

Many Punjabis sided with the British during 1857 mutiny to take revenge on the Bhaiyyas

The land of Achakzai's forefathers (i.e Quetta), a part of Afghan empire, was annexed by the Brits in 1876. And the British Indian Army was predominantly Punjabi at that time. So, yes, Achakzai does have a point

 

[Cherub786]

The Muslims of UP, Bihar and Bengal (British Indian Army of Bengal presidency) sided with the British in the first Anglo-Afghan war (1839-42).

The same Army helped British conquer Punjab in late 1840s

Punjabis sided with the British to take revenge on the Bhaiyyas by siding with the Brits during 1857 mutiny

The land of Achakzai's forefathers (i.e Quetta), a part of Afghan empire, was annexed by the Brits in 1876. And the British Indian Army was predominantly Punjabi at that time. So, yes, Achakzai does have a point

The Anglo-Sikh wars was a liberation of the Punjabi Muslim from the Sikhs. Why would Punjabi Muslims want revenge on the "Bhaiyyas" in 1857. I could understand the Sikhs wanting revenge.
The truth is, the 1857 mutiny was destructive for all of India, anyone with a brain at that time would have sided with the British.
If the British successfully conquered Afghanistan it would be much better today. Afghanistan is a poor, weak country because they never had the benefit of British colonization and development.
Afghans are still in shock that the people east of the Indus (Punjabis) dominate over half of their brethren across the Durand Line. People like Achakzai can't stomach that. Afghans traditionally looked down on Indians east of the Indus. Historically they conquered us many times. But now the tables are turned, Pakistani military is Punjabi dominated institution that rules over half of the Afghans directly, and the other half by proxy (Taliban). Afghan nationalists hate the British for allowing this to happen. After all British created Pakistan and empowered the Punjabi Muslims by letting them dominate the Armed Forces thanks to the Martial Races idea, and favorable recruitment of Punjabi Muslims into the British forces.
This is why I love British. British have always favored us Muslims.

 

[M. Sarmad]

The Anglo-Sikh wars was a liberation of the Punjabi Muslim from the Sikhs. Why would Punjabi Muslims want revenge on the "Bhaiyyas" in 1857. I could understand the Sikhs wanting revenge.
The truth is, the 1857 mutiny was destructive for all of India, anyone with a brain at that time would have sided with the British.
If the British successfully conquered Afghanistan it would be much better today. Afghanistan is a poor, weak country because they never had the benefit of British colonization and development.
Afghans are still in shock that the people east of the Indus (Punjabis) dominate over half of their brethren across the Durand Line. People like Achakzai can't stomach that. Afghans traditionally looked down on Indians east of the Indus. Historically they conquered us many times. But now the tables are turned, Pakistani military is Punjabi dominated institution that rules over half of the Afghans directly, and the other half by proxy (Taliban). Afghan nationalists hate the British for allowing this to happen. After all British created Pakistan and empowered the Punjabi Muslims by letting them dominate the Armed Forces thanks to the Martial Races idea, and favorable recruitment of Punjabi Muslims into the British forces.
This is why I love British. British have always favored us Muslims.

It's a bit more complicated than that. Khalsa Army too had many Muslims. In the decisive battles of Ferozeshah (1845) against Sir Hugh Gough and Governor-General Sir Henry Hardinge, the Punjab Army gun crews composed entirely of Punjabi Muslims

And in the Battle of Sobraon (1846); the Indian waterloo, Sikh commanders (not Muslims) betrayed Punjabis and the British were permitted to reach Lahore on February 26, 1846 as per the 'pre-planned strategy'.

The problem with Pahshtun nationalists is that for them all Punjabis, regardless of their religion, are "Ranjeet Singh ki aulad". They hate Punjabis as it was the Sikhs/Punjabis who rolled back the Afghans to the current border that was later formalized as Durand Line by the British.

 

[Unite & Defend]

Not sure why the Indians complain about British rule - without their presence in the subcontinent for all those centuries there would be no Hindu Hindutva India today. Hindus would all have Imran Khan as their Prime minister, and a country dominated by Muslims.

Hindus should be suckling Western balls just for that! - and you do and always will.

The British were the SECOND best thing to happen to the Hindus of the subcontinent; the FIRST was the Muslim rule that taught Hindu's, civilisation.

So SHUT IT!, ungrateful children!