What's new

History of the Hurs: Sindh

Kabira

BANNED
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
-20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The Hurs were and are the main tribe living in this area. A proud and fierce people, the Hurs had given the British a difficult time. They had rebelled during World War II against British rule [1] During the British rule, Pir Pagaro declared his community “Hur” (free from British slavery). The British tried to crush the uprising and that started an armed resistance by Hurs. Ultimately the British passed the infamous law “Hur Act” where the entire Hur community was declared criminals and were ordered to be shot to death on sight.

The Hurs cannot be said to have been defeated as they continued their struggle even after the hanging of the Pir Sahib, right up to the time of the independence of Pakistan, Pakistan having acquired the status of an independent country. The British were forced by Hurs and a number of other movements to leave the ‘Jewel in the British Crown’. Pir Pagaro Sayyed Sibghatullah Shah was hanged on March 20, 1943 and the British left Pakistan in four years’ time on 14th of August 1947. Long after the end of British rule, Pir Pagaro’s two sons, who were in British custody in England, were released and came back to lead their community. Sindh was a province in the newly independent Pakistan. The sons of Sibghatullah Shah Shaheed were brought to Pakistan in December 1951 after long negotiations. The elder son, Pir Sikandar Shah, Shah Mardan Shah, became the new Pir in February 1952. Shah Mardan Shah II is the current Pir Pagaro.

Hurs in the 1965 War
At the time of the 1965 War the spiritual leader of the Hur was the Pir Pagaro.
The Hurs had earlier not joined the Pakistan Army in any numbers, however with the coming of war, thousands volunteered to fight against the Indians. The Hurs were (due to constraints of finances as well as time) given only basic training and armed with light weapons such as machine guns and assault rifles. The militia was placed under the Pakistani military and para-military forces operating in the sector (known collectively as the “Desert Force”). The Hur militia was commanded by the Faqir Jamal Mangrio.

The battle
The war began on 6 September 1965 and the hostilities in this sector commenced on September the 8th. Initially the Desert Force and the Hur was placed in a defensive role, a role for which they were well suited as it turned out. The Hur were familiar with the terrain and the local area and possessed many essential desert survival skills which their opponents (and indeed their comrades in the Pakistan Army) did not. Fighting as mainly light infantry, the Hur inflicted many casualties on the Indian forces as they entered Sindh. The Hurs were also employed as skirmishers, harassing the Indians LOC, a task they often undertook on camels. As the battle wore on the Hurs and the Desert Force were increasingly used to attack and capture Indian villages inside Rajasthan. It was in this vein that an assault on Kishangarh fort was launched. The attack surprised the Indians and the fort was carried after several days of bitter fighting.

Impact
The use of the Desert Force and the Hurs established a break in the traditions of the Pakistani army. While the Pakistani Army (and its predecessor the British Indian Army) had often used local auxiliaries for scouting and other durties, this was the first time that irregular forces were used on such a wide scale. The capture of this fort gave Pakistan several bargaining chips during the subsequent Tashkent Conference.

In 1965 war of India and Pakistan, the Southern desert sector was a mere sideshow to the major battles fought in the Punjab and in Kashmir. However the Indians had placed two divisions in the desert with the aim of tying down Pakistani troops.

Facing a shortage of troops and unable to divert any substantial forces from the Punjab and Kashmir sectors (where the main Indian thrust has come), the commander of the Pakistan Rangers, Brigadier Khuda Dad Khan, turned to local help. Hurs volunteered in droves. Given only basic training and light weapons, the Hurs nevertheless gave a fine account of themselves in the conflict. Fighting alongside Rangers and regular army units (known collectively as the Desert Force), the Hurs used their knowledge of the desert to good effect and helped to blunt the Indian offensive. But, perhaps their most famous (and militarily important) action was the capture of the Indian fort of Kishangarh, a feature located several kilometers inside India.

The capture of the Kishangarh in Rajasthan State India took place during the 1965 War between India and Pakistan. Its capture was one of the most important actions of the Desert Theater in that war and one of the finest examples of the use of local militia in the history of the Sub-Continent.

Background
The outpost is around 11 kilometers (Lat 27.871 N,Lon 70.563 E) inside Indian territory, in the so called Jaisalmer Bulge. It is a small mud Structure 70 by 60 meters across. It sits 22 km east of the town of Tanot towards the International border. It also sits on the only road linking any part of Rajasthan with the Pakistani city of Rahim Yar Khan.
The Desert Sector was a mere sideshow in the 1965 Indo-Pakistan War. Both sides had little experience in desert fighting at the time, and moreover the main industrial, and economic heartland of Pakistan and India were to the north. As a result when war came the Indians main effort would be against Lahore and Sialkot in the Punjab. However the Indians left some forces in the region with the aim of launching local offensives. Pakistani army troops in the region were already very stretched, having to defend a sector nearly a thousand km in length. To counteract this effort, the commander Pakistan Army Rangers asked the local people for help.

Persecution of Hurs by Bhutto Government
In 1972 Zulfikar Ali Bhutto became the president and then the prime minister of Pakistan. Under his government, the Government of Sindh started a crackdown on Hurs. Matters got worst when four prominent fakirs were gunned down by police. Their photos appeared in the newspapers as dacoits gunned down by police in armed combat.This happened despite the fact that Sindhies considered Hurs as Sindh’s heroes and the historic Bhutto family personally respected Pir Pagaro. In the general elections of 1977, Pir Pagaro decided to break the tradition of not becoming involved in power politics and ran for the seat of parliament from Mr. Bhuttos hometown of Larkana. This was a symbolic gesture of protest but Pir Pagaro was arrested. This saw a bloody clash of Hurs and government leaving hundreds of Hurs and government officials dead.

Creation of Hur Force
In 1977 coup which overthrew Mr. Bhutto, the newly empowered dictator General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, who was looking for some foothold in Sindh, restored the status of Hurs in Pakistan Army. He also appointed a famous Sindhi civil servant Mr. Bashir Ahmed Siddiqui as the Inspector General of Sindh to face the growing problem of dacoits, especially Paro Chandio. Mr. Siddiqui formed a militia called Hur Force out of Hurs. This saw the death of 1965 war hero Faqir Jamal Mangrio by the hand of Paro Chandio but also saw the death of Paro Chandio by the hand of I.G. Siddiqui himself.

Persecution of Hurs by Benazir’s Government
In 1988, President Zia-ul-Haq died in an air crash and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s daughter Benazir Bhutto was elected as Prime Minister. Benazir Bhutto’s government decided to replace the Hur Force with a new force called Magsi Force, consisting of militants from the tribe of Mir Nadir Ali Magsi, a rival of Hurs. Benazir Bhutto encouraged and supported clash between forces and after bloody clashes the Hur Force was weakened substantially.


UNTOLD STORY:::::

Local people have found large amounts of wood in the bed of the Chotiari Reservoir, Sanghar district, after the water level in the reservoir reached dead level. Elders of the area believe that the big trees which are visible now in the reservoir once constituted the historic Makhi Forest, which was a hideout for the Hur Tahreek fighters before the Partition.

“It was the center of the Hur resistance movement against the British rule (over India) under the command of Pir Sibghatullah Shah Rashdi, a spiritual leader,” said 65-year-old president of the Hur Historical Society Sanghar, Mir Nizamani.

He told The News that before the Chotiari reservoir was built the place was known as the Baqar Lake, a cluster of several freshwater lakes, and the Makhi forest used to be near it.

He provided details that when the British army in retaliation bombed a village, Jadoopur, still located at a sand dune in the middle of the reservoir, killing some people, including a woman, the Hur fighters had to change their strategy. They made a cut in the major Nara Canal, due to which water inundated a wide area and most of the travel routes were blocked. It was the year 1942-43, the Hur fighters led by Rahim Hingoro hid in the Makhi forest, he added.

The reason to adopt this strategy was that most of the villages inhabited by the resistance fighters or their supporters were located at sand dunes and these artificial floods would not allow the British forces to harm the residents, Nizamani said. He added that the cut in the Nara Canal inundated the forest area and turned it into a number of water lakes.

Moreover, he said that since the Hur elders were either killed on the battlefield or put into concentration camps with their entire families by the British government, remaining families in the area migrated to other areas. By the time the concentration camps were abolished and the people languishing in those camps were released, the Hur population was scattered to different locations. “And nobody knew where the Makhi forest had gone,” Nizamani added.

https://jadamsindhu.wordpress.com/2011/02/05/history-of-the-hur-movement/
 
Thanks for sharing this. Proud people, Hur's have always intrigued me. Why doesnt it surprise me that Bhutto despised them. Jeay Sindh huh?

I didn't knew about them. Was reading about hur PML-F candidate joining PPP. Apparently they are pretty much only opposition party to PPP in interior Sindh.
 
I didn't knew about them. Was reading about hur PML-F candidate joining PPP. Apparently they are pretty much only opposition party to PPP in interior Sindh.

My knowledge of them was limited to their brave acts in the 65 war and that Pir Pagaro was their head. However I was unaware of their resistance against the British and Bhutto's opposition to them. Of course PPP should have a monopoly on the Sindhi vote, how dare an alternative party try to take their vote.

The below link gives some good info on the Rajasthan front during the 65 war as well pictures of Hurs and rangers outside Kishangarh Fort
http://pakarmy.pk.tripod.com/rajasthan.html

rajasthan-gutaro-fort.jpg


rajhistan1.jpg


Kishangarh is deep inside Indian territory, capturing it really was a great feat.

upload_2017-4-27_18-46-18.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-4-27_18-45-24.png
    upload_2017-4-27_18-45-24.png
    787.2 KB · Views: 72
My knowledge of them was limited to their brave acts in the 65 war and that Pir Pagaro was their head. However I was unaware of their resistance against the British and Bhutto's opposition to them. Of course PPP should have a monopoly on the Sindhi vote, how dare an alternative party try to take their vote.

The below link gives some good info on the Rajasthan front during the 65 war as well pictures of Hurs and rangers outside Kishangarh Fort
http://pakarmy.pk.tripod.com/rajasthan.html

rajasthan-gutaro-fort.jpg


rajhistan1.jpg


Kishangarh is deep inside Indian territory, capturing it really was a great feat.

View attachment 393404

Bhutto used state machinery to crush political opponent. No wonder Hurs joined hands with Zia in 1977.
 
Hur history is a valuable part of Sindhi history. More should be done to uncover more about the Hurs. It would also be interesting to learn about the Talpurs (they are Baloch some say) and Samna and Soomra dynasties. They are also a valuable part of our Pakistani history. Not only Sindhis, all of us should learn a thing or two about them.
 
Anyone who is from Sindh would have heard of Hurs and their bravery, right from fighting the British to actually conquering Indian forts despite being lightly armed. Truly a brave and loyal people.
 
Hur history is a valuable part of Sindhi history. More should be done to uncover more about the Hurs. It would also be interesting to learn about the Talpurs (they are Baloch some say) and Samna and Soomra dynasties. They are also a valuable part of our Pakistani history. Not only Sindhis, all of us should learn a thing or two about them.
Compared to the Delhi Sultanate, and later the Mughals, the Samma and Soomra dynasties were quite insignificant, same as the Deccan kingdoms, hence, our history books(at elast those in primary, secondary schools) only record the major dynasties, even the Delhi sultanate is not discussed as deeply as the Mughal rule and then the British rule.
 
Compared to the Delhi Sultanate, and later the Mughals, the Samma and Soomra dynasties were quite insignificant, same as the Deccan kingdoms, hence, our history books(at elast those in primary, secondary schools) only record the major dynasties, even the Delhi sultanate is not discussed as deeply as the Mughal rule and then the British rule.

I get the point you are making but then again the history of the Soomras, Saama's etc is not insignificant for the people of Sindh and Southern Punjab, which together make up a significant proportion of Pakistan's population. The Makli Tombs are an architectural masterpiece that few of our students will know about because they are busy studying the campaigns of Aurengzeb against Shivaji in the Deccan, or Shah Jehan's campaigns in Balkh. The same goes for Ranikot Fort, tomb of Hoshu Sheedi etc. The young generation and dare I say even many urban members of the elder generations are criminally unaware of the history of the lands they are physically residing in.
 
I get the point you are making but then again the history of the Soomras, Saama's etc is not insignificant for the people of Sindh and Southern Punjab, which together make up a significant proportion of Pakistan's population. The Makli Tombs are an architectural masterpiece that few of our students will know about because they are busy studying the campaigns of Aurengzeb against Shivaji in the Deccan, or Shah Jehan's campaigns in Balkh. The same goes for Ranikot Fort, tomb of Hoshu Sheedi etc. The young generation and dare I say even many urban members of the elder generations are criminally unaware of the history of the lands they are physically residing in.
Again, because history in our schools is not taught as extensively as it is supposed to be, we jump from IVC, to Muhammad bin Qasim, then to small mentions of Ghaznavi, Ghauri, and some mentions of Delhi Sultanate, then to major portions of the lives of the Mughal Emperors till Aurangzeb, then directly to British. From thereon it is quite extensive, the different political movements, etc. to formation of Pakistan.
 
Compared to the Delhi Sultanate, and later the Mughals, the Samma and Soomra dynasties were quite insignificant, same as the Deccan kingdoms, hence, our history books(at elast those in primary, secondary schools) only record the major dynasties, even the Delhi sultanate is not discussed as deeply as the Mughal rule and then the British rule.
I agree their significance due to their lack of power at the time and their status as vassals of Mughals was a key factor in them being ignored and when it comes to major powers they weren't one.

Yet this is a beautiful part of Sindhi history which Sindhis can call their own, their ancestors. Even now the Sindhi Soomra tribe is relatively well off compared to a lot of other Sindhi speaking tribes. Point is the Hur movement, Talpur history and Soomra and Samna history is a valuable part of the culture/history and should be taught in schools at least in Sindh if not elsewhere. I am not a Sindhi and am against ethnic identity being used as an Anti Pak weapon. But history, language and culture must be preserved. It is their basic right.
 
I agree their significance due to their lack of power at the time and their status as vassals of Mughals was a key factor in them being ignored and when it comes to major powers they weren't one.

Yet this is a beautiful part of Sindhi history which Sindhis can call their own, their ancestors. Even now the Sindhi Soomra tribe is relatively well off compared to a lot of other Sindhi speaking tribes. Point is the Hur movement, Talpur history and Soomra and Samna history is a valuable part of the culture/history and should be taught in schools at least in Sindh if not elsewhere. I am not a Sindhi and am against ethnic identity being used as an Anti Pak weapon. But history, language and culture must be preserved. It is their basic right.
Not against teaching them, but just pointing out the reason that they are mostly omitted. Other than that, effort should indeed be made to teach about the all of the dynasties that once ruled the region that is now Pakistan, not just in Sindh, but all over Pakistan.
 
Compared to the Delhi Sultanate, and later the Mughals, the Samma and Soomra dynasties were quite insignificant, same as the Deccan kingdoms, hence, our history books(at elast those in primary, secondary schools) only record the major dynasties, even the Delhi sultanate is not discussed as deeply as the Mughal rule and then the British rule.
What's the point of comparing the two? And Pak Studies history discusses way more insignificant things, why not teach people their actual history for a change? The syllabus includes people like Syed Ahmed Barelvi, Bengali reformer Haji Shariutallah etc. just to give you a perspective

I agree their significance due to their lack of power at the time and their status as vassals of Mughals was a key factor in them being ignored and when it comes to major powers they weren't one.

Yet this is a beautiful part of Sindhi history which Sindhis can call their own, their ancestors. Even now the Sindhi Soomra tribe is relatively well off compared to a lot of other Sindhi speaking tribes. Point is the Hur movement, Talpur history and Soomra and Samna history is a valuable part of the culture/history and should be taught in schools at least in Sindh if not elsewhere. I am not a Sindhi and am against ethnic identity being used as an Anti Pak weapon. But history, language and culture must be preserved. It is their basic right.
It is *Samma btw
 
The syllabus includes people like Syed Ahmed Barelvi, Bengali reformer Haji Shariutallah etc. just to give you a perspective
Again, because they were generally well known across the sub-continent as compared to the Hurs, or most probably because the current curriculum of Sindh was decided upon in the tenure of Bhutto, and being the person that he was, he may not have included the struggle of Hurs, as that would have i had the effect of increasing the political stature of Pir Pagara, who was a political opponent of the PPP.

why not teach people their actual history for a change?
Actual history is being taught, just not in detail.
 
Last edited:
Again, because they were generally well known across the sub-continent as compared to the Hurs, or most probably because the current curriculum of Sindh was decided upon in the tenure of Bhutto, and being the person that he was, he may not have included the struggle of Hurs, as that would have i had the effect of increasing the political stature of Pir Pagara, who was a political opponent of the PPP.
So you're saying people like Syed Ahmed Barelvi, Haji Shariatullah et al. were known more in the region of Pakistan than Sindhi dynasties like Soomro, Samma, Kalhoro, Talpur etc.? And that the former should be given priority over the latter? You said the Mughals had more influence hence they were included in the curriculum as compared to the Sindhi dynasties, but what about Ahmed Barelvi, Haji Shariutallah that make up a good part of the Pak Studies history syllabus?
 
Back
Top Bottom