What's new

History of Nishapur- one of the greatest cities in the Middle Ages

Charon 2

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
350
Reaction score
0
Country
Turkey
Location
Germany
Nishapur or Nishabur ( pronunciation ; Persian: نیشابور‎, alsoRomanized as Nīshāpūr, Nīshābūr, and Neyshābūr from Middle Persian: New-Shabuhr, meaning "New City of Shapur", "Fair Shapur",[4] or "Perfect built of Shapur"),[5] is a city in the Razavi Khorasan Province, capital of the Nishapur County and former capital of Khorasan, in northeastern Iran, situated in a fertile plain at the foot of the Mount Binalud. It had an estimated population of 239,185 as of 2011 and its county 433,105. Nearby are theturquoise mines that have supplied the world with turquoise for at least two millennia.

The city was founded in the 3rd century by Shapur I as a Sasanian satrapy capital. Nishapur later became the capital of Tahirid dynasty and was reformed by Abdullah Tahir in 830, and was later selected as the capital of Seljuq dynasty by Tughril in 1037. From the Abbasid era to Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia and Eastern Iran, the city evolved into a significant cultural, commercial, and intellectual center within the Islamic world. Nishapur, along withMerv, Herat and Balkh were one of the four great cities of Greater Khorasan and one of the greatest cities in the middle ages, a seat of governmental power in eastern of caliphate, a dwelling place for diverse ethnic and religious groups, a trading stop on commercial routes from Transoxiana and China, Iraq and Egypt. The city reached the height of its prosperity under the Samanids in the 10th century, but was destroyed by Mongols in 1221, and further ruined by other invasions and earthquakes in the 13th century. After that time, a much smaller settlement was established just north of the ancient town, and the once bustling metropolis lay underground—until a team of excavators from the Metropolitan Museum of Artarrived in the mid-20th century. They worked at Nishapur between 1935 and 1940, returning for a final season in the winter of 1947–48.[6] What remains of old Nishapur region is a 3500 hectares "Kohandejh" area, south of the current city of Nishapur.

Little archaeology has been done on this vast and complicated site. George Curzon remarked that Nishapur had been destroyed and rebuilt more times than any other city in history,[7] an evocative statement whether or not it is statistically true. The Metropolitan Museum of Art undertook excavations from 1935 that were interrupted in 1940. Searching largely for museum-worthy trophies that they shared with the government of the Shah, the Metropolitan's publications were limited to its own Nishapur ceramics. The site of Nishapur has been ransacked for half a century since World War II, to feed the international market demand for early Islamic works of art.

Shadiyakh (in Persian: شادیاخ, a contracted form of شادی کاخ, Shadi-Kakh or Palace of Happiness) was one of the main palaces of old Nishapur up to the 9th century AD, which became more important and populated after that. Some notable people like Attar lived there. Attar's tomb is nowadays in that area. This palace was perhaps completely ruined in the 13th century.

Middle Ages

Nishapur occupies an important strategic position astride the old Silk Road that linked Anatolia and the Mediterranean Seawith China. On the Silk Road, Nishapur has often defined the flexible frontier between the Iranian plateau and Central Asia. The town derived its name from its reputed founder, the Sassanian king Shapur I, who is said to have established it in the 3rd century CE. Nearby are the turquoise mines that supplied the world with turquoise for at least two millennia. It became an important town in the Khorasan region but subsequently declined in significance until a revival in its fortunes in the 9th century under the Tahirid dynasty, when the glazed ceramics of Nishapur formed an important item of trade to the west. For a time Nishapur rivaled Baghdad or Cairo: Toghrül, the first ruler of the Seljuk dynasty, made Nishapur his residence in 1037 and proclaimed himself sultan there, but it declined thereafter, as Seljuk fortunes were concentrated in the west. In the year 100 0CE, it was among the 10 largest cities on earth.[8] After the husband of Genghis Khan's daughter was killed at Nishapur in 1221, she ordered the death of all in the city (~1.7 million), and the skulls of men, women, and children were piled in pyramids by the Mongols. This invasion and earthquakes destroyed the pottery kilns. In 1979, the 15th World Scout Jamboree was scheduled to be held in Nishapur, but it was cancelled because of the uprising against the Shah of Iran led byAyatollah Ruhollah Khomeini .

Nishapur - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Okay that the daughter of Ghengis Khan ordered the massacre of the city is news to me. I thought that Ghegnis was independent but damn he massacred a whole city because his daughter told him to do so. Sad!
 
Last edited:
Okay that the daughter of Ghengis Khan ordered the massacre of the city is news to me. I thought that Ghegnis was independent but damn he massacred a whole city because his daughter told him to do so. Sad!
Actually, some of people of nishapur did terror toquchar, the favorite son in law of Genghis khan, and one of his 5 important generals(The rest 4 of them were his sons). It happened after some time after capturing Nishapur, and it was a terrorist act, and deserved to be punished harshly. Genghis Khan himself ordered to kill every living thing in that city, including every single human being, and even their domestic animals.
 
Pura in Sanskrit means town or city like Singapore;Singh+pura which means land of lions.we have many small towns and cities in India like Nagpur,kanpur etc which end in pur.
 
Okay that the daughter of Ghengis Khan ordered the massacre of the city is news to me. I thought that Ghegnis was independent but damn he massacred a whole city because his daughter told him to do so. Sad!
Genghis Khan and first generation of Mongols in general are only known in history by their savageness, and being bloodthirsty. That's the reason they have no heritage, and actually not even one single good thing remains from them and they are seen negatively in all territories they captured.

Later generations though, were more sane, and adopted the culture of areas they ruled, as the case with Ilkhanids in Iran which adopted the culture and language of native people.
 
Actually, some of people of nishapur did terror toquchar, the favorite son in law of Genghis khan, and one of his 5 important generals(The rest 4 of them were his sons). It happened after some time after capturing Nishapur, and it was a terrorist act, and deserved to be punished harshly. Genghis Khan himself ordered to kill every living thing in that city, including every single human being, and even their domestic animals.

I didn't know the details how he was killed but that still doesn't give them the right to massacre even the children. I mean I understand that they wanted to punish the city but why must children and women suffer? That's why Mongols were so special because they did the most unbelievable things
 
I didn't know the details how he was killed but that still doesn't give them the right to massacre even the children. I mean I understand that they wanted to punish the city but why must children and women suffer? That's why Mongols were so special because they did the most unbelievable things

No, actually it was not unbelievable for those times. most empires were built on massacring other older existing empires.
 
Genghis Khan and first generation of Mongols in general are only known in history by their savageness, and being bloodthirsty. That's the reason they have no heritage, and actually not even one single good thing remains from them and they are seen negatively in all territories they captured.

Later generations though, were more sane, and adopted the culture of areas they ruled, as the case with Ilkhanids in Iran which adopted the culture and language of native people.

Whether we like it or not Mongol Conquest led to some positive things, for one Mongols didn't care about forcing people to convert to their faith. About the perception of Mongols, it depends if you're their descendant or not, the same way I respect Cyrus for his deeds, others may respect Genghis for his conquests. Remember respecting someone doesn't necessarily means liking them!
 
Whether we like it or not Mongol Conquest led to some positive things, for one Mongols didn't care about forcing people to convert to their faith. About the perception of Mongols, it depends if you're their descendant or not, the same way I respect Cyrus for his deeds, others may respect Genghis for his conquests. Remember respecting someone doesn't necessarily means liking them!

That's true! Ghengis Khan himself ordered the freedom for religion in the Mongol empire and the status of woman was also higher than in other societies
 
Genghis Khan and first generation of Mongols in general are only known in history by their savageness, and being bloodthirsty. That's the reason they have no heritage, and actually not even one single good thing remains from them and they are seen negatively in all territories they captured.

Later generations though, were more sane, and adopted the culture of areas they ruled, as the case with Ilkhanids in Iran which adopted the culture and language of native people.
he only killed those who stood against him dont forget his democracy he reward those who joined him and bloodily punish those who resist him
 
Whether we like it or not Mongol Conquest led to some positive things, for one Mongols didn't care about forcing people to convert to their faith. About the perception of Mongols, it depends if you're their descendant or not, the same way I respect Cyrus for his deeds, others may respect Genghis for his conquests. Remember respecting someone doesn't necessarily means liking them!

There is a story about how Cyrus was killed in herodotus book, which shows how Cyrus has been seen by other nations. You can find it here:
As you said, it depends on the point of view, that you look at it.
 
I didn't know the details how he was killed but that still doesn't give them the right to massacre even the children. I mean I understand that they wanted to punish the city but why must children and women suffer? That's why Mongols were so special because they did the most unbelievable things
I heard that the bayat a Turkmen tribe killed his son in law so he massacred them that's why many of that tribe members fled to Iraq and still living their(al bayati)tribe
 
he only killed those who stood against him dont forget his democracy he reward those who joined him and bloodily punish those who resist him

Yeah but don't forget that Turkics also suffered by the Mongol invasions. I doubt that the massacred cities in Khorasan like Merv, Gurganj, Nishapur.. were purely Persian cities. The Khwarezmian dynasty itself was of Turkic origin.

The Khwarazmian dynasty (also known as the Khwarezmid dynasty, dynasty of Khwarazm Shahs, and other spelling variants; from Persian خوارزمشاهیان Khwārazmshāhiyān, "Kings of Khwarezmia") was a Persianate[3][4][5] Sunni Muslim dynasty of Turkic mamluk origin.[6][7]

The dynasty ruled large parts of Greater Iran during the High Middle Ages, in the approximate period of 1077 to 1231, first asvassals of the Seljuqs[8] and Kara-Khitan,[9] and later as independent rulers, up until the Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia in the 13th century. The dynasty was founded by Anush Tigin Gharchai, a former Turkish slave of the Seljuq sultans, who was appointed the governor of Khwarezm. His son, Qutb ad-Din Muhammad I, became the first hereditary Shah of Khwarezm.[10]

Khwarazmian dynasty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anyways I have mixed feelings about the Mongols and the Mongol empire
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom