hinduism

[manlion]

How the British invented Hinduism
https://www.newstatesman.com/node/156145

Built by Tamil king of Chola Dynasty

hey Tamizh genius it was the Pallavas not Cholas (see below)

Lol what are you talking about ? We don't mention this because we know this and feel proud that our ancestors colonised South East Asia and formed many empires there.

From the religion, Language to the architecture as well as important figures we ours.

Even today these same brahmin immigrants hold important position in royal thai court.

In 731, the Pallava king Parameswaravarman died without any heir and hence the Pallava empire was kingless. Parameswaravarman was the last ruler of the Simhavishnu line of Pallavas.

That their enemies would not utilize the opportunity to invade the country, the military leaders (dandanayakas), scholars and representatives of mercantile and peasantry formed an entourage and undertook "a long journey" to reach the kingdom of Kambujadesa (कम्बोजदेश; "land of Kambuja") – modern day Cambodia and Vietnam – ruled by a certain Kadavesa Hari Varma, who stemmed from the Pallava lineage and was 6th descendant of Bhimavarman, the brother of the great Simha Vishnu.[2] The king had four sons. The first three (Kshatriyamalla, Sangramamalla and Rajamalla) declined the offer. The last one by name Pallava Malla Parameswara also known as Nandi Varman, who was then 14 years old, accepted the request. Nandivarman's becoming a king at such an early age is referred to in many inscriptions and contemporary literature (referring to him as "The one of strong arms who got the kingdom at a tender age" or the one who became king at an early age).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nandivarman_II

Thai Brahmin immgrants were from Tamilnadu not Gangadesh , Hindustan or India and they were not Hindus as there was no India or Hindu in the 10th AD they were either Tamil saivites or Vaisnavites

Where Thai-brahmins chant Tamil hymns

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ms-chant-Tamil-hymns/articleshow/55314354.cms

Thai triyumpavai - Tamil Tiruvenpavai

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/where-thai-brahmins-chant-tamil-hymns.525923/#post-9979538

 

[RPK]

hey Tamizh genius it was the Pallavas not Cholas (see below)

Ok genius they have connection with cholas also

 

[manlion]

View attachment 497724

Bhagavad Gita chapter 18 verse 66 contradicts the above false claim by Fawley, Krishna says - any one who accepts him will be forgiven for his/her sins

 

[LASER1]

Bhagavad Gita chapter 18 verse 66 contradicts the above false claim by Fawley, Krishna says - any one who accepts him will be forgiven for his/her sins

Bhagavat gita is a conversation between Krishna and Arjuna. It's not Krishna and the world, Dharmopadesha gives Arjuna the will to fight Kauravas.

There's nothing contradictory about it, it only means Arjuna to believe in Krishna.

And Dr David Frawley is right, it's the Karma. Because the same Arjuna and Pandavas were sent to naraka initially because of their karma. Yudhishtira was made to see naraka for one simple lie.

 

[Hey I'll love you]

thats because there is no such thing as hinduism, at best its a fake Puranic religion with complete 180 on original Dharma, Vedic religion like new age Abrahamic religions are to Judaism.

i belong to traditional Rigvedic Brahmin family, basically those who still follow original Dharma and original Book Rigveda over other vedas and puranas. Hinduism is mixture of Animist belifs with indo=Aryan traditions.

I'll not elaborate on that but rather i would say the masses follow traditions which are different and basically gods are same but donation ( dakshina etc) castiesm (jat etc) I are not followed in assamese hindu tradition.
See shankardeva assam on google

 

[Mugwop]

Is it about judgement?

No it's not! People are judged differently in different religions. They have different set of rules and pantheons etc.
The thing I am talking about is mentioned in every single Religion,Culture known to man kind.

 

[El Sidd]

No it's not! People are judged differently in different religions. They have different set of rules and pantheons etc.
The thing I am talking about is mentioned in every single Religion,Culture known to man kind.

Marriage.....

Shivers down the spine already

 

[Mugwop]

Marriage.....

Shivers down the spine already

No it's not marriage either

 

[El Sidd]

No it's not marriage either

Must be.

 

[Great Brahmin]

How the British invented Hinduism
https://www.newstatesman.com/node/156145




hey Tamizh genius it was the Pallavas not Cholas (see below)



In 731, the Pallava king Parameswaravarman died without any heir and hence the Pallava empire was kingless. Parameswaravarman was the last ruler of the Simhavishnu line of Pallavas.

That their enemies would not utilize the opportunity to invade the country, the military leaders (dandanayakas), scholars and representatives of mercantile and peasantry formed an entourage and undertook "a long journey" to reach the kingdom of Kambujadesa (कम्बोजदेश; "land of Kambuja") – modern day Cambodia and Vietnam – ruled by a certain Kadavesa Hari Varma, who stemmed from the Pallava lineage and was 6th descendant of Bhimavarman, the brother of the great Simha Vishnu.[2] The king had four sons. The first three (Kshatriyamalla, Sangramamalla and Rajamalla) declined the offer. The last one by name Pallava Malla Parameswara also known as Nandi Varman, who was then 14 years old, accepted the request. Nandivarman's becoming a king at such an early age is referred to in many inscriptions and contemporary literature (referring to him as "The one of strong arms who got the kingdom at a tender age" or the one who became king at an early age).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nandivarman_II

Thai Brahmin immgrants were from Tamilnadu not Gangadesh , Hindustan or India and they were not Hindus as there was no India or Hindu in the 10th AD they were either Tamil saivites or Vaisnavites

Where Thai-brahmins chant Tamil hymns

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ms-chant-Tamil-hymns/articleshow/55314354.cms

Thai triyumpavai - Tamil Tiruvenpavai

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/where-thai-brahmins-chant-tamil-hymns.525923/#post-9979538

Lol Dravidian i don't give a damn about your people,even brahmins who live in your lands dont consider themselves dravidian.

They spit on your face and call you inferior subhumans, there is a reason you have brahmin hatred in your state.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Well superstit

Does the last paragraph depict violence

No violence. You will lose your mind.

 

[manlion]

Bhagavat gita is a conversation between Krishna and Arjuna. It's not Krishna and the world, Dharmopadesha gives Arjuna the will to fight Kauravas.

There's nothing contradictory about it, it only means Arjuna to believe in Krishna.

And Dr David Frawley is right, it's the Karma. Because the same Arjuna and Pandavas were sent to naraka initially because of their karma. Yudhishtira was made to see naraka for one simple lie.

Point 1 -
a) The B G was broadcast-ed to the world through Sanjaya
b) BG chpt 9 verse 26

patram puspam phalam toyam
yo me bhakt ya prayacchati
tad aham bhakty-upahrtam
asnami prayatatmanah

TRANSLATION
If one offers Me with love and devotion a leaf, a flower, fruit a water, I will accept it.

ya in the verse refers to whoever not Arjuna

If its a dharma upadesa to Arjuna why is it accepted as the prasthana trayam by the vedantists and Vaisnavites ?

Prasthana Trayam:

(i) Vedas and Upanishads
(ii) Bhagavad-Gita
(iii) Brahma Sutras

Upanishads (Shruti prasthana, the starting point of revelation) and the Bhagavad-Gita (Smriti prasthana, the starting point of remembered tradition) are the basic source texts of Vedanta school.

The Brahma sutras is also known as Vedanta Sutras, constitute the Nyaya prasthana, the logical starting point of the Vedanta philosophy.

No study of Vedanta is considered complete without a close examination of the Prasthana Trayam, the texts that stand as the three starting points.

The Brahma Sutras attempt to reconcile the seemingly contradictory and diverse statements of the various Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita, by placing each teaching in a doctrinal context. The word sutra means thread, and the Brahma sutras literally stitch together the various Vedanta teachings into a logical and self-consistent whole.

Point 2 -
B G Chpt 18 Verse 66

sarva-dharman parityajya
mam ekam saranam vraja
aham tvam sarva-papebhyo
moksayisyami ma sucah

Abandon all varieties of dharma and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reaction. Do not fear.

According to The BG - Surrender negates Karma , this is the essence and conclusion of B G, which debunks Fawleys on karma (Sarva dharma) , paradise (moksa) and forgiveness of sins etc (Sarva papebhyo )

 

[Buddhistforlife]

There are two types
1) hindu by inclusion
2) hindu by exclusion

Hinfuism

 

[manlion]

Lol Dravidian i don't give a damn about your people,even brahmins who live in your lands dont consider themselves dravidian.

They spit on your face and call you inferior subhumans, there is a reason you have brahmin hatred in your state.

what an irony .. then why do these superior brahmins chant the inferior Tamil hymns i.e Tirupavai and Tiru venpavai ? Btw these superior race were brought to SE Asia by inferior Dravidian Cholas and Pallavas. Why to these superior brahmins worship inferior Tamil /Dravidian gods - Siva, Vishnu etc and not their superior vedic gods ?

Culture less barbaric race should stop hijacking Tamils culture and contribution as Indian or Hindu, I reiterate fthere was no Hindu or India in the 10th AD. Dont your kind have any shame ?

Trivambave, Tribave in Bangkok

An annual Festival called " trivambave - tribave" is being celebrated by =Thais. Does the name sound familiar to your South Indian ears ? It is a Tamil Word. Here are some clues.

This festival is held for 15 days between December 14 to January 12 during our Marghazhi Month by brahmin priests. chanting verses in praise of Hindu gods. Got it ?

IT IS THIRUPPAVAI AND THIRUVEMBAVAI.... . AND YES IT IS A THAI FESTIVAL.

Bangkok could be the only place in the world where our Thiruppavai and Thiruvempavai is recited during the month of Marghazhi by Thai Brahmin Priests. These Thai Brahmins are descendents of Tamil Brahmins froM Rameshwaram, Srivilliputtur and other parts of South India who were brought to this land as early as the 2nd century .

To understand the presence of Brahmins in Thailand you need to know a bit of a history of Thailand.

Some of you would know that the area comprising the present Thailand, Cambodia and Burma was once ruled by Khemers till 13th century. Historians believe that the Khemers were either our Pallava Kings or Leaders of local tribes who were made Kings by Pallavas. (There are plenty of proof, by way of archeological findings, legends and stone inscriptions to confirm the theory of Political connections between
the Palllava Kingdom of India and the Khemer Kingdom of Thailand... That a separate topic by itself)

Khemer Kings, being Hindus, practiced either Vaishnavism or Shaivism. The King who built Angkorwat , Surya varman, was a Vaishnavite and it was built as a Vishnu Temple. The Khemer Kings adopted a concept called "Devaraja Cult" which means that the King is an incarnation of Vishnu or Shiva. They built temples for Vishnu and Shiva and consecrated statues representing themselves as Gods and promoted
themselves as the undisputed leaders of their subjects.

https://www.sites.google.com/site/indianoceancommunity1/culture

 

[LASER1]

Point 1 -
a) The B G was broadcast-ed to the world through Sanjaya
b) BG chpt 9 verse 26

patram puspam phalam toyam
yo me bhakt ya prayacchati
tad aham bhakty-upahrtam
asnami prayatatmanah

TRANSLATION
If one offers Me with love and devotion a leaf, a flower, fruit a water, I will accept it.

Still doesn't disprove me. This is a conversation with Arjuna. If Krishna said, anyone can worship me with a fruit or flower or nothing, I will accept anything if the intention of the prayer is pure. By I Krishna means the parabrahma, not just Krishna. That is, Krishna is parabrahma.

Read sloka 16 - 25. Explains it clearly.

Abandon all varieties of dharma and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reaction. Do not fear.

According to The BG - Surrender negates Karma , this is the essence and conclusion of B G, which debunks Fawleys on karma (Sarva dharma) , paradise (moksa) and forgiveness of sins etc (Sarva papebhyo )

Again, these are for Arjuna, it doesn't mean if you do all sorts of bad things and worship Krishna, you'll not face any punishments. In fact, Arjuna faced punishment for believing he is the best and had a pride in it.

Please, don't quote things you have no idea of.