What's new

High-tech drones could have neutralised Chinese intrusions at LAC but India didn’t have them

Han-Tang

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 13, 2020
Messages
476
Reaction score
0
Country
China
Location
China
High-tech drones could have neutralised Chinese intrusions at LAC but India didn’t have them

在Leh的陆军总司令MM Naravane归档照片,以检查拉达克东部实际控制线的安全局势和作战准备情况  图片:Twitter / @ adgpi

File photo of Army Chief General M.M. Naravane at Leh to review security situation and operational preparedness along the Line of Actual Control in Eastern Ladakh | Photo: Twitter | @adgpi

High-tech drones could have neutralised Chinese intrusions at LAC but India didn’t have them
With both China and Pakistan having the capability to manufacture drones, it is only a matter of time before non-State actors start using them too.


For the past one month, the ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan has made the militaries world over sit up and take notice of the extensive use of high-end military technology — armed/unarmed drones and loiter munitions, colloquially known as kamikaze drones. The videos that have emerged from the conflict demonstrate how artificial intelligence-based weapons system will have a major impact on shaping the contours of future conflicts, relegating the much romanticised close combat to the sidelines.

It is empirical wisdom that the development and introduction of path-breaking military technologies, and their antidotes is near simultaneous. What you require is the know-how and a will to reform and pay the costs involved — India is notorious for violating these cardinals. Nothing demonstrates this better than our inability in neutralising the Chinese intrusions and coercion on the LAC due to the huge differential in high-technology capabilities.

What are these technologies?
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or drones as they are popularly called, have been around for nearly four decades now. These were initially developed for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR). Armed with an array of sensors and having long endurance, the UAVs gave real-time intelligence of the battlefield to direct the fire of various weapon systems. The 21st century saw the advent of armed drones that could carry Precision Guided Munitions (PGM) and missiles. Their effectiveness was proved in Afghanistan beginning 2001—eliminating Al-Qaeda and Taliban leadership. Initially, this capability was the monopoly of the US, but in the last few years, at least 10 countries other than America — Israel, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Iran, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Russia and the United Arab Emirates — have conducted drone strikes, and many more countries have them in their arsenal.

Drones can be used both at the tactical and strategic level. The latter is dependent on space-based intelligence, communications and navigation . The US, Israel and China are the biggest manufacturer of drones of all types. Turkey has progressed rapidly to produce, export and use armed drones.

Loiter munition is a bomb with an inbuilt guidance system, which is much cheaper to produce and can effectively target weapons system and personnel. These come both in kamikazi (one-time use mode) and the more sophisticated return-to-base models, in case it remains un-utilised. A swarm of such loiter munition can be launched from a launcher with multiple tubes. The use of loiter munition in large numbers will be a game changer on the tactical battlefield. The psychological impact of being targeted by an unknown and unseen enemy is far greater – “Where are you, bastards? ” shouted a frustrated Armenian soldier after one such devastating strike.

China, Pakistan and non-State actors
China initially relied on imports but has now become a leading manufacturer and seller of these modern weapons. In 2015, Pakistan, Iraq, and Nigeria all conducted strikes using armed drones supplied by, or developed in coordination with China. China has both unarmed and armed drones in its inventory. Hence, it is logical to presume that it has a large number of loiter munitions as well.

During China’s National Day parade in October 2019, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) displayed a number of UAVs — DR-8 supersonic spy drone, the GJ-11 stealth combat drone and the GJ-2 reconnaissance and strike drone. The PLA has also deployed another drone named CH-4, which underwent tests in the Tibetan plateau region in 2018, and the BZK-005C, specifically modified for use in high altitudes. Since 2017, China has exported CH-4 and CH-5 fixed-wing reconnaissance and strike drones, selling them to more than 10 countries, shipping more than 200 units every year. Recently, China also conducted a test of swarm drones.


As early as 2013, Pakistan had displayed two domestically produced drones based on China’s CH-3 model that were already in service in its armed forces. In 2015, Pakistan used its domestic model, the Burraq, based on CH-3 in a publicly-owned strike on militants in the North Waziristan region. In 2018, China finalised its biggest drone sale when Pakistan agreed to buy 48 GJ-2 drones, under its export name Wing Loong II. Pakistan is also likely to possess loiter munitions in unknown numbers.

With both our adversaries having the capability to manufacture drones, it is only a matter of time before non-State actors start using them too — both for induction of arms/ammunition/stores and for direct attack. Man pack loiter munition is the most likely mode of attack by the terrorists.

Where does India stand?
India has, so far, been using drones primarily for ISR purposes. It began early by importing Searcher 1 and 2 drones from Israel in the late 1990s for the three Services. These were followed by the Heron — a sophisticated long-range, long-endurance and high-altitude unarmed drone. Ninety Herons are currently in service with the Indian armed forces. The Indian Air Force (IAF) has also imported a limited number of Harop suicide drones from Israel, primarily for suppression of enemy air-defence systems. The Indian Navy is in the process of procuring 30 unarmed Sea Guardian drones from the US. However, India’s indigenous development of various unarmed/armed drones is still at the trial stage.

So far, India does not have the classic strategic armed drone in its arsenal, though we have initiated the project to modify part of the existing fleet of Heron UAVs into armed UAVs. The combination of two foundational pacts signed with the US — Communication Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA) in 2018 and the Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (BECA) on Tuesday — has paved the way for importing 30 Reaper or Predator-B armed drones. These agreements will also make the drone attacks more effective due to access to geospatial, communications, location and navigation capabilities.

India has also floated a request for information for man-portable loiter munitions. The face-off on the LAC has given the impetus to fast track the procurement of drones and loiter ammunition.

The Way forward
There should be no doubt that the Indian armed forces have been left way behind with respect to development and possession of armed drones, loiter ammunition and other AI military technologies. It is pertinent to highlight that what was achieved by the surgical strike of 2016 and the Balakot air strike of 2019 could have also been done with the help of loiter munitions and armed UAVs. They would have captured high-resolution real-time videos of the attack and the damage caused for psychological impact as is being done by Azerbaijan.

While urgent procurement is necessary to bridge this yawning gap in the armed drones and loiter munition capability, eventually, a holistic look would be required to exploit emerging AI technologies and integrate them with the existing conventional systems. And for this, India’s scientific community and the Defence Research and Development Organisation will have to rise from their slumber and deliver. Selcuk Bayraktar who quit his PhD at MIT in 2007 to develop Turkey’s Bayraktar TB2 armed drone, considered a game changer, at less than half the cost of the much acclaimed Reaper armed drone, should be a role model for our IIT graduates.

Lt Gen H S Panag PVSM, AVSM (R) served in the Indian Army for 40 years. He was GOC in C Northern Command and Central Command. Post retirement, he was Member of Armed Forces Tribunal. Views are personal.
 
高科技无人机可能已经消除了中国在拉美的入侵,但印度却没有

在Leh的陆军总司令MM Naravane归档照片,以检查拉达克东部实际控制线的安全局势和作战准备情况  图片:Twitter / @ adgpi

在Leh的陆军总司令MM Naravane归档照片,以检查拉达克东部实际控制线的安全局势和作战准备情况 图片:Twitter | @adgpi

高科技无人机可能已经消除了中国在拉美的入侵,但印度却没有
由于中国和巴基斯坦都有制造无人机的能力,非国家行为者也开始使用它们只是时间问题。



在过去的一个月中,亚美尼亚与阿塞拜疆之间持续不断的冲突使军队世界处于坐立不安的状态,并注意到高端军事技术的广泛使用-武装/非武装无人机和游击弹药,俗称“神风敢死队”无人机。冲突中出现的视频演示了基于人工智能的武器系统将如何对塑造未来冲突的轮廓产生重大影响,从而使浪漫化的近距离战斗落到了场边。

基于经验的智慧是,开创性的军事技术及其解毒剂的开发和引进几乎是同时进行的。您需要的是专有技术以及改革和支付相关费用的意愿-印度因违反这些主要法规而臭名昭著。由于高科技能力的巨大差异,没有什么比我们无力消除中国对LAC的入侵和胁迫更好的了。

我分析了这些技术,我们的对手对其的利用,我们的现状以及前进的方向。

这些技术是什么?
无人驾驶飞机(UAV)或无人机通常被称为近40年。这些最初是为情报,监视和侦察(ISR)开发的。无人机配备有一系列传感器并具有很长的续航能力,可实时提供战场情报,以指挥各种武器系统的射击。21世纪,武装无人机的问世可以携带精确制导弹药(PGM)和导弹。从2001年开始在阿富汗证明了它们的有效性-消除了基地组织和塔利班的领导。最初,这种能力是美国的垄断,但在最近几年中,除美国以外,至少还有10个国家-以色列,英国,巴基斯坦,伊拉克,尼日利亚,伊朗,土耳其,阿塞拜疆,俄罗斯和阿拉伯联合酋长国-进行了无人机打击,

无人机可以在战术和战略层面上使用。后者取决于天基情报,通信和导航。美国,以色列和中国是各种类型无人机的最大制造商。土耳其在生产,出口和使用武装无人机方面取得了长足的进步。

游击弹药是带有内置制导系统的炸弹,其生产成本低得多,并且可以有效地瞄准武器系统和人员。这些功能既可以使用kamikazi(一次性使用模式),也可以使用更复杂的基础返还模型,以防万一它未被使用。可以从具有多支管的发射器中发射出这样的游击弹药群。大量使用巡逻弹药将改变战术战场上的游戏规则。被未知的,看不见的敌人作为目标的心理影响要大得多–“混蛋你在哪里?一次毁灭性的罢工后,一名沮丧的亚美尼亚士兵大喊。

中国,巴基斯坦和非国家行为者
中国最初依靠进口,但现在已经成为这些现代武器的领先制造商和销售商。2015年,巴基斯坦,伊拉克和尼日利亚都使用由中国提供或与中国合作开发的武装无人机进行了罢工。中国的库存中既有无人机,也有武装无人机。因此,可以合理地假设它也有大量的游击弹药。

2019年10月的国庆阅兵期间,中国人民解放军(PLA)展示了许多无人机-DR-8超音速间谍无人机,GJ-11隐形战斗无人机以及GJ-2侦察和打击无人机。解放军还部署了另一架名为CH-4的无人机,该无人机于2018年在青藏高原地区进行了测试,还有BZK-005C专门为高海拔使用而进行了改装。自2017年以来,中国已经出口了CH-4和CH-5固定翼侦察和打击无人机,销往10多个国家,每年运送200多架。最近,中国还对一群无人机进行了测试


早在2013年,巴基斯坦就展示了两架基于中国CH-3模型的国产无人机,这些无人机已经在其武装部队服役。2015年,巴基斯坦在北瓦济里斯坦地区的武装分子公开罢工中,使用了基于CH-3的国内模型Burraq。在2018年,中国完成其最大的无人驾驶飞机出售时,巴基斯坦同意购买48 GJ-2无人机,根据其出口的名字永龙II。巴基斯坦也可能拥有数量不明的巡逻弹药。

由于我们两个对手都有制造无人机的能力,非国家行为者也开始使用它们只是时间问题—既用于引诱武器/弹药/储存,又用于直接攻击。背负装it子弹药是恐怖分子最有可能攻击的方式。

印度站在哪里?
到目前为止,印度一直主要将无人机用于情监侦目的。首先是在1990年代后期从以色列进口Searcher 1和2无人机用于这三种服务。其次是苍鹭-一种复杂的远程,持久力和高空无人驾驶无人机。九十苍鹭目前在印度武装部队服役。印度空军(IAF)还从以色列进口了数量有限的 Harop 自杀式无人机,主要用于压制敌方防空系统。印度海军正在从美国采购30架无武装的海上卫士无人机。但是,印度对各种非武装/无人驾驶无人机的本土化开发仍处于试验阶段。

到目前为止,印度没有在阿森纳的经典战略武装无人机,尽管我们已经启动了项目,修改苍鹭无人机的现有船队的一部分进入武装无人机。与美国签署的两项基本公约的结合-2018年的通信兼容性和安全协议(COMCASA)和周二的基本交流与合作协议(BECA)-为进口30架Reaper或Predator-B武装无人机铺平了道路。这些协议还将通过获得地理空间,通信,定位和导航功能,使无人机攻击更加有效。

印度还提出了要求提供便携式巡逻弹药信息要求。LAC的对峙为快速追踪无人机和巡逻弹药的采购提供了动力

前进的道路
毫无疑问,印度武装部队在发展和拥有武装无人机,巡逻弹药和其他AI军事技术方面已被甩在后面。有必要强调的是,2016年的外科手术袭击和2019年的Balakot空袭也可以在游击弹药和武装无人机的帮助下完成。他们本来可以捕获该攻击和心理冲击造成的伤害的高分辨率实时视频,就像阿塞拜疆所做的那样。

虽然必须紧急采购以弥合武装无人机和巡逻弹药能力之间的这一巨大缺口,但最终仍需要整体外观来利用新兴的AI技术并将其与现有的常规系统集成。为此,印度的科学界和国防研究与发展组织将不得不从沉睡中解脱并交付。Selcuk Bayraktar于2007年退出麻省理工学院攻读博士学位,以开发土耳其的Bayraktar TB2武装无人机,该产品被认为是改变游戏规则的人,其成本不到广受赞誉的Reaper武装无人机的一半,应该成为我们IIT毕业生的榜样。

HS Panag PVSM中校,AVSM(R)在印度陆军服役40年。他曾担任C北方司令部和中央司令部的GOC。退休后,他是武装部队法庭成员。观点是个人的。
Please at least translate this article to English before posting. This is still a English language forum after all.
 
Stopped reading after the 'Pakistan has the capability to manufacturer drones '.
I shudder to think such a shallow piece from a guy who headed our western/northern command for some time.
Typical case of politics clouding your writing. He is affiliated to the AAP.
 
surgical strike of 2016 and the Balakot air strike of 2019 could have also been done with the help of loiter munitions and armed UAVs. They would have captured high-resolution real-time videos of the attack and the damage caused for psychological impact as is being done by Azerbaijan.

o_O lol This sardar is stupid as ****. India never intended to film so called dream scenario sirgical strikes rest of the world laugh at, you don't need drones for that lmao
 
Stopped reading after the 'Pakistan has the capability to manufacturer drones '.
I shudder to think such a shallow piece from a guy who headed our western/northern command for some time.
Typical case of politics clouding your writing. He is affiliated to the AAP.
Of course a two bit chaddi troll knows more about Indian capabilities than a 3 Star flag officer.
As they say in IT cells if you can't refute them put a label on them
 
How come using drones is different than using Airforce? Indian side did not even use small arms to engage Chinese drone or no drones make no difference at all.
 
Stopped reading after the 'Pakistan has the capability to manufacturer drones '.
I shudder to think such a shallow piece from a guy who headed our western/northern command for some time.
Typical case of politics clouding your writing. He is affiliated to the AAP.

Quick to disown the opinion of a man who spent his life in the service of India. You wonder why your forces suffer low morale....
 
Highly delusional thread title. Hypothetically speaking, even if such an action had happened, China would not retaliate, would not inflict disproportionate damage, would not escalate the situation?
 
Quick to disown the opinion of a man who spent his life in the service of India. You wonder why your forces suffer low morale....
Low morale, poor planning, poor reserves, badly led, etc. , but still good enough to retain kashmir without having to fight a war. Guess our opponents are too busy in non defense matters or too afraid.
 
Low morale, poor planning, poor reserves, badly led, etc. , but still good enough to retain kashmir without having to fight a war. Guess our opponents are too busy in non defense matters or too afraid.

Afraid? Funny, how we can provide evidence of our "fear", in the form of a shot down IAF pilot, video of your sub being forced to surface, and video of our airstrikes. Of course when it comes to your evidence we just get Twitter or Forum warriors such as yourself.....
 
Afraid? Funny, how we can provide evidence of our "fear", in the form of a shot down IAF pilot, video of your sub being forced to surface, and video of our airstrikes. Of course when it comes to your evidence we just get Twitter or Forum warriors such as yourself.....

I mean we did Kargil and took down their Jets and did an ***-whooping to their pilot and still they think we are "too afraid". Despite the fact that they are 7x bigger than Pakistan in every domain.:lol:
 
Afraid? Funny, how we can provide evidence of our "fear", in the form of a shot down IAF pilot, video of your sub being forced to surface, and video of our airstrikes. Of course when it comes to your evidence we just get Twitter or Forum warriors such as yourself.....
Always good to have a opponent who lives in fantasy land.
Remember your vibrating general sahasb ?
 
Always good to have a opponent who lives in fantasy land.
Remember your vibrating general sahasb ?

Please, fight with your army, not forum posts. Indian Armed Forces is 3 times size of Pak forces. We are waiting.....with tea.....
 
Highly delusional thread title. Hypothetically speaking, even if such an action had happened, China would not retaliate, would not inflict disproportionate damage, would not escalate the situation?

Here's a better title:
"Nukes could have neutralised Chinese intrusions at LAC and India did have them"
 
Back
Top Bottom