Hezbollah's Secretary General Seyyed Nasrallah visited Iran, spoke Farsi

[_Nabil_]

What are you talking about lmfao, a third of my military duty was in South Lebanon border, literally at the border.
Hezbollah got L'd and Lebanon turned into a poor unstable ****hole

A typical keyboard Warrior

Your retreat from South Lebanon is well documented and you can learn about your catastrophic 2006 war from your government official inquiry and it's conclusions

 

[Beny Karachun]

A typical keyboard Warrior

Your retreat from South Lebanon is well documented and you can learn about your catastrophic 2006 war from your government official inquiry and it's conclusions

Lol, poor Arabs living in trash and then say we lost

 

[_Nabil_]

عادي ، أن كان في ذالك حرام فما عن أنصار المقاومة الذين يصفون بن سلمان وبن زايد بليهود؟ هل ذالك حلال للنسبه لك؟حرام طبعا

بعدين ليش قاتل حالك علي الحكام، انا لست بعالم أو رجل الدين، أن كنت تري في نفسك الهدي فارشدنا اخي الكريم

الله يهدي الجميع

ثم انك قلت عني يهودي في أول رد كتبته في الموضوع، وقلت ذالك عني من قبل

كنت عارف ان فعلي مدان، لكن حبيت أحسسك مرارة انو حد بيصفك بليهودي

قلت ذالك من قبل؟ لا أتذكر، ممكن عدم رويتي الأعلام، انا لا أهاجم فلسطيني حتى لو كان على خطء
هلا عرفت انك فلسطيني

Lol, poor Arabs living in trash and then say we lost

Poor Jews living in illusions and not believing their institutions

 

[Falcon29]

الله يهدي الجميع

اللهم امين لنا ولكم

كنت عارف ان فعلي مدان، لكن حبيت أحسسك مرارة انو حد بيصفك بليهودي

قلت ذالك من قبل؟ لا أتذكر، ممكن عدم رويتي الأعلام، انا لا أهاجم فلسطيني حتى لو كان على خطء
هلا عرفت انك فلسطيني

لا عليك ....

الفلسطيني ملزوم بحق الله وكونه فلسطيني لا يغير بذالك

We should not be held to any other standards . There is nothing special about Palestinian people. Everyone should be held to same standards. كما أمرنا الله

في امان الله

 

[_Nabil_]

اللهم امين لنا ولكم

لا عليك ....

الفلسطيني ملزوم بحق الله وكونه فلسطيني لا يغير بذالك

We should not be held to any other standards . There is nothing special about Palestinian people. Everyone should be held to same standards. كما أمرنا الله

في امان الله

لا أخي، الفلسطينيين على عينا و راسنا
و لو إختلفنا، نعطيهم الحق
و علينا واجب الإحترام و التقدير
و مهما فعلنا معهم ما تأنخلص
أنا أقدس كل ما هو فلسطيني

 

[Falcon29]

لا أخي، الفلسطينيين على عينا و راسنا
و لو إختلفنا، نعطيهم الحق
و علينا واجب الإحترام و التقدير
و مهما فعلنا معهم ما تأنخلص
أنا أقدس كل ما هو فلسطيني

وانتم علي عينا و راسنا ، شكرا اهلنا الكرام في تونس

لكن لا تنسي

لا قدسيه لغير القدوس

 

[SalarHaqq]

Hasn't left his bunker since 2006 lol

Were these images taken in his bunker?

All are much more recent that 2006.

Besides, this man dedicated everything he has to the just cause he believes in. Including his own son Hadi Nasrallah, martyred in fighting occupiers. How many world leaders can claim as much? That's right, not many. So living a secluded life is nothing of a sacrifice to a selfless person like this.

The memory of Sayyed Javad Nasrallah about his brother martyr

Here is a memory from the Hizbollah secretary general's son, Sayyed Javad Nasrallah, about his brother martyr.

navideshahed.com

 

[drmeson]

Who is the persian in all of this stop the hallucinations...

Both Muhammed of Ghor and Qutb Ud-Din Aibak were Turk.... I don't see persians stop the hallucination and persia was there subject..

Muhammed of Ghor: Turk
Qutb Ud-Din Aibak: Turk
Ghorids: Turk

ROFL. Ghori dynasty was TAJIK as agreed by actual western scholars instead of two-bit internet trolls.

• "Some scholars state that the Ghori dynasty was of Tajik origin".[1][2]

• "We can only assume that they were eastern Iranian Tajiks".[3] Bosworth further points out that the actual name of the Ghurid family, Āl-e Šansab (Persianized: Šansabānī), is the Arabic pronunciation of the originally Middle Persian name Wišnasp".[3]"

• The historian André Wink explains in The New Cambridge History of Islam:[4]

"The Shansabānī dynasty superseded the Ghaznavids in the second half of the twelfth century. This dynasty was not of Turkish, nor even Afghan, but of eastern Tājīk origin, speaking a distinct Persian dialect of its own, like the rest of the inhabitants of the remote and isolated mountain region of Ghūr and its capital of Fīrūzkūh (in what is now central Afghanistan)"

References

1. Encyclopaedia of Islam, "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: "... The Shansabānīs were, like the rest of the Ghūrīs, of eastern Iranian Tājik stock ..."
2. Wink 2020, p. 78.
3. Bosworth 2001b, pp. 586–590.
4. Wink, André (2010). "The early expansion of Islam in India". In Morgan, David O.; Reid, Anthony (eds.). The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 3: The Eastern Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 96. ISBN 978-0-521-85031-5.

................

So Ghorids were Tajiks and Aybeg was Mamluk Turkic. Considering that Oghuz Turks and Iranics (Azeris, Anatolian Turkish, Persians, Kurds, Lurs, Ghasghghai, tats etc etc) have same or extremely close genepool (look below), We have no connection to pakistani north indic genepool. You should use ID's of your own indic kings who share DNA and culture with you instead of borrowing heroes from our Irano-Turkic genetic clines. What is wrong with that? I am giving you pride and you are throwing it away to borrow a hero from another race.

 

[Qutb-ud-din-Aibak]

ROFL. Ghori dynasty was TAJIK as agreed by actual western scholars instead of two-bit internet trolls.

• "Some scholars state that the Ghori dynasty was of Tajik origin".[1][2]

• "We can only assume that they were eastern Iranian Tajiks".[3] Bosworth further points out that the actual name of the Ghurid family, Āl-e Šansab (Persianized: Šansabānī), is the Arabic pronunciation of the originally Middle Persian name Wišnasp".[3]"

• The historian André Wink explains in The New Cambridge History of Islam:[4]

"The Shansabānī dynasty superseded the Ghaznavids in the second half of the twelfth century. This dynasty was not of Turkish, nor even Afghan, but of eastern Tājīk origin, speaking a distinct Persian dialect of its own, like the rest of the inhabitants of the remote and isolated mountain region of Ghūr and its capital of Fīrūzkūh (in what is now central Afghanistan)"

References

1. Encyclopaedia of Islam, "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: "... The Shansabānīs were, like the rest of the Ghūrīs, of eastern Iranian Tājik stock ..."
2. Wink 2020, p. 78.
3. Bosworth 2001b, pp. 586–590.
4. Wink, André (2010). "The early expansion of Islam in India". In Morgan, David O.; Reid, Anthony (eds.). The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 3: The Eastern Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 96. ISBN 978-0-521-85031-5.

................

So Ghorids were Tajiks and Aybeg was Mamluk Turkic. Considering that Oghuz Turks and Iranics (Azeris, Anatolian Turkish, Persians, Kurds, Lurs, Ghasghghai, tats etc etc) have same or extremely close genepool (look below), We have no connection to pakistani north indic genepool. You should use ID's of your own indic kings who share DNA and culture with you instead of borrowing heroes from our Irano-Turkic genetic clines. What is wrong with that? I am giving you pride and you are throwing it away to borrow a hero from another race.

The GFTO with that conspiracy theory Muhammad of Ghor was Turk not Tajik.. I have seen some Tajikis claim him falsely.. There is no historical count claiming him to be Tajik but as Turk.

He had equal amount Afghans, Tajikis and Turks in his armed forces tho as it was a diverse society and not ethnic based but rather religion this is what united them and made them brothers..

So all this ethnic talk you doing they would have been disgusted by it themselves

 

[drmeson]

The GFTO with that conspiracy theory Muhammad of Ghor was Turk not Tajik.. I have seen some Tajikis claim him falsely.. There is no historical count claiming him to be Tajik but as Turk.

He had equal amount Afghans, Tajikis and Turks in his armed forces tho as it was a diverse society and not ethnic based but rather religion this is what united them and made them brothers..

So all this ethnic talk you doing they would have been disgusted by it themselves

It is not my theory Pakistani aibak lol, it is written by authentic western research professors like emeritus Prof. Andre Wink, and Prof. Boswoth from top universities in the world. Your Indic propaganda would not work here, stop shooting yourself in the foot by denying western professors.

For illiterate people, please read the work of western scholars with peer-reviewed authentic conclusions on Tajik origin of Ghori Empire which ruled India:-

• "Some scholars state that the Ghori dynasty was of Tajik origin".[1][2]
• "We can only assume that they were eastern Iranian Tajiks".[3] Bosworth further points out that the actual name of the Ghurid family, Āl-e Šansab (Persianized: Šansabānī), is the Arabic pronunciation of the originally Middle Persian name Wišnasp".[3]"
• The historian André Wink explains in The New Cambridge History of Islam:[4]

"The Shansabānī dynasty superseded the Ghaznavids in the second half of the twelfth century. This dynasty was not of Turkish, nor even Afghan, but of eastern Tājīk origin, speaking a distinct Persian dialect of its own, like the rest of the inhabitants of the remote and isolated mountain region of Ghūr and its capital of Fīrūzkūh (in what is now central Afghanistan)"

References

1. Encyclopaedia of Islam, "Ghurids", C.E. Bosworth, Online Edition, 2006: "... The Shansabānīs were, like the rest of the Ghūrīs, of eastern Iranian Tājik stock ..."
2. Wink 2020, p. 78.
3. Bosworth 2001b, pp. 586–590.
4. Wink, André (2010). "The early expansion of Islam in India". In Morgan, David O.; Reid, Anthony (eds.). The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 3: The Eastern Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 96. ISBN 978-0-521-85031-5.

.........................................

Ghorids were Tajiks or some later kings in India were Oghuz, (Iranics and Turks have almost same genetics, always lived and intermingled togather), what does it have to do with Pakistanis? an Indic majority nation? You should stop stealing our heroes and get your own ones who share ethnic origin and culture with you. Look where we are and where your country is in the genetic pool.

We west asians (Iranics and Turks) have nothing to do with South Asia except for the fact that our tribes have ruled India for Millenium. I can post a list if you seek. My own tribe (Afshars) has some nasty history in India. Google it.