What's new

Here is what DG NSG has to say about Pathankot attack

silent poison

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
926
Reaction score
-7
Country
India
Location
India
New Delhi, Jan 24 (PTI) With questions being raised over the Centre's decision to send NSG commandos instead of Army troopers to the IAF base in Pathankot, the chief of the elite force today said the 'black cats' are the only special force "suited" for undertaking such operations.
"I can say it with full authority that the NSG is a force that is meant for and suited for such operations as the situation in Pathankot warranted. We specialise in counter- terror operations in built-up areas with people around and that was the task given to us.
"I think we accomplished our task with the least collateral damage. This is also the first time that our crack teams were sent in advance to counter a terrorist assault.
Almost every time else in the past, we have been sent after the terrorists had made the first assault," NSG Director General R C Tayal told PTI in an interview.
The DG said the terrorists' "aim" was to destroy the IAF's flying assets and that they were determined to stage a surprise attack in the wee hours after they managed to sneak into the air base.
The January 2 attack on the base, which houses fighter jets and attack helicopters, left 7 security personnel dead.
Six militants were also killed.
Tayal added that the commandos of its counter-terror wing had no constraints of weapons or equipment required to operate in such conditions.
"We got what we wanted then and there. As soon as my commander asked for troop carriers, the Army sent them in from their nearby cantonment. The troops had with themselves night vision devices, see-through gadgets and corner-shot weapons.
It was decided by on-ground commanders to locate the terrorists, box them and hit them, which they successfully did," he said.
The DG said NSG was divided into three teams inside the air base.
"One took guard where the aircraft hangar is located, one was made to secure the residential units of the IAF personnel and the third took charge to engage the terrorists who had sneaked in," he said. .
 
cool, what corner shot guns do the NSG/Army have ?
 
New Delhi, Jan 24 (PTI) With questions being raised over the Centre's decision to send NSG commandos instead of Army troopers to the IAF base in Pathankot, the chief of the elite force today said the 'black cats' are the only special force "suited" for undertaking such operations.
"I can say it with full authority that the NSG is a force that is meant for and suited for such operations as the situation in Pathankot warranted. We specialise in counter- terror operations in built-up areas with people around and that was the task given to us.
"I think we accomplished our task with the least collateral damage. This is also the first time that our crack teams were sent in advance to counter a terrorist assault.
Almost every time else in the past, we have been sent after the terrorists had made the first assault," NSG Director General R C Tayal told PTI in an interview.
The DG said the terrorists' "aim" was to destroy the IAF's flying assets and that they were determined to stage a surprise attack in the wee hours after they managed to sneak into the air base.
The January 2 attack on the base, which houses fighter jets and attack helicopters, left 7 security personnel dead.
Six militants were also killed.
Tayal added that the commandos of its counter-terror wing had no constraints of weapons or equipment required to operate in such conditions.
"We got what we wanted then and there. As soon as my commander asked for troop carriers, the Army sent them in from their nearby cantonment. The troops had with themselves night vision devices, see-through gadgets and corner-shot weapons.
It was decided by on-ground commanders to locate the terrorists, box them and hit them, which they successfully did," he said.
The DG said NSG was divided into three teams inside the air base.
"One took guard where the aircraft hangar is located, one was made to secure the residential units of the IAF personnel and the third took charge to engage the terrorists who had sneaked in," he said. .
Is he indirectly saying Commandos of respective Armed Forces are not good enough to defend their own bases ?
 
Is he indirectly saying Commandos of respective Armed Forces are not good enough to defend their own bases ?

Well what he is indirectly saying is that Black cats are best suited for such type of Op in residential area( Terrorist hit residential area in Pathankot AFS ) and provided the fact NSG is mostly selected from armed forces Personnels . Your comment is bogus .
 
Is he indirectly saying Commandos of respective Armed Forces are not good enough to defend their own bases ?

No, he his stating that each commando unit is raised for some specific purpose. NSG commondos comprise of army personnels as are garud, the parachute regiment, the Marcos etc, all come from the army.

There equipment and training differs, you won't find the parachute regiment using corner shots.
 
If it was Para SF, they would have certainly used brute force. But the proximity of Op area ( IAF assets and residential buildings) demanded to exercise restraint. the mandate was/is clear- NSG in civilian/built-up areas.
 
New Delhi, Jan 24 (PTI) With questions being raised over the Centre's decision to send NSG commandos instead of Army troopers to the IAF base in Pathankot, the chief of the elite force today said the 'black cats' are the only special force "suited" for undertaking such operations.
"I can say it with full authority that the NSG is a force that is meant for and suited for such operations as the situation in Pathankot warranted. We specialise in counter- terror operations in built-up areas with people around and that was the task given to us.
"I think we accomplished our task with the least collateral damage. This is also the first time that our crack teams were sent in advance to counter a terrorist assault.
Almost every time else in the past, we have been sent after the terrorists had made the first assault," NSG Director General R C Tayal told PTI in an interview.
The DG said the terrorists' "aim" was to destroy the IAF's flying assets and that they were determined to stage a surprise attack in the wee hours after they managed to sneak into the air base.
The January 2 attack on the base, which houses fighter jets and attack helicopters, left 7 security personnel dead.
Six militants were also killed.
Tayal added that the commandos of its counter-terror wing had no constraints of weapons or equipment required to operate in such conditions.
"We got what we wanted then and there. As soon as my commander asked for troop carriers, the Army sent them in from their nearby cantonment. The troops had with themselves night vision devices, see-through gadgets and corner-shot weapons.
It was decided by on-ground commanders to locate the terrorists, box them and hit them, which they successfully did," he said.
The DG said NSG was divided into three teams inside the air base.
"One took guard where the aircraft hangar is located, one was made to secure the residential units of the IAF personnel and the third took charge to engage the terrorists who had sneaked in," he said. .
Where are all the "experts" in the Indian media now who have been busy questioning the NSG's deployment since day 1??

Is he indirectly saying Commandos of respective Armed Forces are not good enough to defend their own bases ?
He did't even remotely imply that. As he said- the NSG is a highly specilised force and this operation (in an urban enviroment with civilians at risk) perfectly suited them.

Military SF in most nations wouldn't deal with urban CT/HR, it would always be a civlian/police unit like the NSG/GSG9/FBI HRT/GIGN etc etc.

Perhaps only in failed states and dictatorships where the military calls the shots does that happen (military getting involved in policing duties).
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom