Heisenberg's theory of uncertainty based on Vedas, Rajnath Singh says

[TimeToScoot]

well sometimes it might help to do that. thanx for the link

This is the real deal written by me Hinduism and Quantum Physics: Hinduism and Quantum Physics for Dummies

 

[Indrani]

Rajiv Malhotra will be doing it soon. Are you or @Indrani aware of what I'm talking about?

Also, any Muslim interested in a debate on Hinduism and Islam with me? Let it be a 1-1 decent moderated conversation. Who is up for the challenge baby?

Nondualism.

 

[TimeToScoot]

Nondualism

Yes but what is non dualism and why do so many scientists prefer this over the reigning scientific worldview which is materialism?

 

[Indrani]

well sometimes it might help to do that. thanx for the link

As Rajiv Malhotra stated, Indian science is experiential in nature. Western science is like a referee using a stop clock to measure the speed at which Usain Bolt ran and then claiming greatness over Usain Bolt.

 

[jaunty]

Wasn't Karna the first test tube baby, the sperm of Surya and the eggs from Kutni was fertilized in an 'earthen pot', and then was injected into Kunti with a 'bamboo pichkari' for the development of embryo.

This was the inspiration for the holy song of 'Balam pichkari, jo tune mujhe maari'.

It will only be reliable if you post a link to a blog that claims it.

 

[Dubious]

I bashed everyone equally, @Akheilos can testify my bashing on the scientific fallacy in Koran, last time I had a debate with her.

you forgot to put in how miserably you failed

 

[Skull and Bones]

you forgot to put in how miserably you failed

That depends on the perception as you failed to give any peer reviewd papers just to justify your claim.

 

[Dubious]

That depends on the perception as you failed to give any peer reviewd papers just to justify your claim.

What was the topic?

 

[The SC]

Yes, I know about the double slit experiment. It is one of the most famous experiments in modern science.

All it proves is that _we_ currently don't have the technology to observe reality without changing it. How can we make claims about what is, or is not, possible for civilizations millions of years more advanced technologically?

Even with a million years advanced technologies from now that can see the reality on its own, it will always be limited to interpretation by humans, and these limits stems from the human body's limits. So as long as Humans will try to observe reality they will be part of it. Detachment might occur during interpretation of the observed phenomena but will also be dependent on the parameters set for the original observation concerning the physical and psychological limits imposed by nature on the observer and not on the phenomenon being observed, which itself is ruled and limited by other natural laws of physics.

 

[Developereo]

Even with a million years advanced technologies from now that can see the reality on its own, it will always be limited to interpretation by humans, and these limits stems from the human body's limits. So as long as Humans will try to observe reality they will be part of it. Detachment might occur during interpretation of the observed phenomena but will also be dependent on the parameters set for the original observation concerning the physical and psychological limits imposed by nature on the observer and not on the phenomenon being observed, which itself is ruled and limited by other natural laws of physics.

Physical limitations of the observer don't affect objective reality. We can not see ultraviolet light with our eyes, but we can still accept its existence.

For something to be claimed as a fundamental law of nature, it must be an objective part of reality, not a consequence of an observer's characteristics.

 

[Jayanta]

What about Heisenberg's theory on crystal meth? Is that based on the Puranas?

No thats straight from BREAKING BAD.

 

[The SC]

Common among all three Abarahamic religions (in case you are taking a cheap shot at Muslims as usual) but then they don't present it as scientific fact nor do they use these kind of beliefs to distort history and/or science.

Have you ever had this thought that the word Brahman originated with prophet Abraham (Ibrahim) PBUH who has lived in fertile crescent and had moved between there and the Indus valley with his wife Sarah? The words have some resemblance but the attributes still have more!!! So if to attain that degree of enlightenment that Abraham had, a normal being will be called Brahman or Abraham-like.

 

[The SC]

Physical limitations of the observer don't affect objective reality. We can not see ultraviolet light with our eyes, but we can still accept its existence.

For something to be claimed as a fundamental law of nature, it must be an objective part of reality, not a consequence of an observer's characteristics.

But those observer's characteristics are objective parts of reality, they are measurable too inside the spectrum of senses. So in any way they affect objective reality or just reality.

 

[shuntmaster]

Heisenberg's theory of uncertainty based on Vedas, Rajnath Singh says

Hindus had the Vedas for over 3000years. If there were scientific knowledge in them, what were the practical applications that were derived by the Vedic scholars based on Vedic science?
This is similar to claims by Islamist's regarding scientific revelations in the Quran.

 

[Luca1]

Nopes, that was from ancient knowledge of breakingbadas!!

Either this one or weeds.