What's new

Heavy price of India-Pak N-war

United

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
2,008
Reaction score
-1
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
main-qimg-1c6f5bd599267235ecca06af64a4752e

India and Pakistan continue to square off in the Kashmir region, a region which has been the center of a dispute between Pakistan and India since the British created the borders of the two countries. The two sides have continuously exchanged fire, gone to war, and agreed to cease-fires over their history. War in this region is all too common between the two nuclear powers, so what makes this time any different?

Unlike in the past, both sides now have advanced nuclear weapons and the ability to deliver them to each others countries for use either on the battlefield, or strategically against harden targets or cities. They both also have larger, better equipped armed forces with new allies and new policies.

India with its new govt and its ministers of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) urging nuclear attack and the Pakistan defence minister threatens to “annihilate” India in return, these are a reminder of the costs of nuclear war.

More than 21 million people will be directly killed, about half the world’s protective ozone layer would be destroyed, and a “nuclear winter” would cripple the monsoons and agriculture worldwide.

But the real costs would be higher and not just in India and Pakistan, where the first 21 million people–half the death toll of World War II–would perish within the first week from blast effects, burns and acute radiation, Another two billion people worldwide would face risks of severe starvation due to the climatic effects of the nuclear-weapon use in the subcontinent.

Wars have always been fought despite of their unlikeliness throughout the history due to negligent and aggressive foolish leadership,

Is this new BJP gov ready to keep the whole india at stake and opt for a bankrupt and a destroyed Nation.
 
. .
For me war in any type is bad for mankind, nuclear war more so
Especially for India as Pakistan will target 550 to 600 million people through 100+ direct nuke strikes on metropolitan areas (~50 million in 10 cites), large cities (~100 million in 40 cities), 2nd tier cities (~200 - 250 million in 60 cities), and large towns (~200 million) and the amount of radiation and chaos will eventually kill 1.1 to 1.2 billion people and that will be unfortunate, I must say but it will be inevitable.
 
Last edited:
. . .
No they won't. A nuclear war between any 2 countries will become World War 3 automatically.

Don't think so any of such war is going to happen cause Delhi is not that much fool yet to call their own death...they'll poison us slowly...

Nuclear bombs are just to keep the waves in limits.. No one will fire that, no matter what happens..!!
 
.
Don't think so any of such war is going to happen cause Delhi is not that much fool yet to call their own death...they'll poison us slowly...

Nuclear bombs are just to keep the waves in limits.. No one will fire that, no matter what happens..!!
Never underestimate RSS fools.
 
. .
Don't think so any of such war is going to happen cause Delhi is not that much fool yet to call their own death...they'll poison us slowly...

Nuclear bombs are just to keep the waves in limits.. No one will fire that, no matter what happens..!!

No nuclear armed country has ever gone to direct war with another nuclear armed country. The mutually assured destruction only moves the battlespace to proxies and economics, that is all.

And even if there were to be nuclear lunacy in South Asia, the world will carry on, quite well, actually. Attempting to blackmail the rest of the world with a nuclear conflict simply will not work. At all. 100%.
 
.
Pakistan should not worry about nuclear war because Pakistanis are already being killed by Indian forces in IOK past many decades We himself consider our self Pakistanis stranded in Indian occupation. Indian will never let Kashmir by talks Pakistan should fulfill dream of Muhammad Ali Jinnah by attacking and uniting Kashmir.
 
.
And the rest of the world will carry on.
True that :lol:

Pakistan should not worry about nuclear war because Pakistanis are already being killed by Indian forces in IOK past many decades We himself consider our self Pakistanis stranded in Indian occupation. Indian will never let Kashmir by talks Pakistan should fulfill dream of Muhammad Ali Jinnah by attacking and uniting Kashmir.
:lol: three times the "dream" has been tried to fulfill. You wana fight, please take a gun and go fullfill the so called "dream" of Quaid.
 
.
main-qimg-1c6f5bd599267235ecca06af64a4752e

India and Pakistan continue to square off in the Kashmir region, a region which has been the center of a dispute between Pakistan and India since the British created the borders of the two countries. The two sides have continuously exchanged fire, gone to war, and agreed to cease-fires over their history. War in this region is all too common between the two nuclear powers, so what makes this time any different?

Unlike in the past, both sides now have advanced nuclear weapons and the ability to deliver them to each others countries for use either on the battlefield, or strategically against harden targets or cities. They both also have larger, better equipped armed forces with new allies and new policies.

India with its new govt and its ministers of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) urging nuclear attack and the Pakistan defence minister threatens to “annihilate” India in return, these are a reminder of the costs of nuclear war.

More than 21 million people will be directly killed, about half the world’s protective ozone layer would be destroyed, and a “nuclear winter” would cripple the monsoons and agriculture worldwide.

But the real costs would be higher and not just in India and Pakistan, where the first 21 million people–half the death toll of World War II–would perish within the first week from blast effects, burns and acute radiation, Another two billion people worldwide would face risks of severe starvation due to the climatic effects of the nuclear-weapon use in the subcontinent.

Wars have always been fought despite of their unlikeliness throughout the history due to negligent and aggressive foolish leadership,

Is this new BJP gov ready to keep the whole india at stake and opt for a bankrupt and a destroyed Nation.

if india and pakistan wanted a nuclear war it would have happened by now
 
.
True that :lol:


:lol: three times the "dream" has been tried to fulfill. You wana fight, please take a gun and go fullfill the so called "dream" of Quaid.
Are you Pakistani?
If Yes What a shame and coward you are
Let me clear First time Pakistani brothers help us to free 35% of Kashmir.
Second time India attacked and Pakistani brothers were defenders and they war is for Bangladesh not for Kashmir.
Third time they successfully help mujahideens to occupy and free Kargil but they lost at diplomatic front since India is not ready to give Kashmir and nuclear war is imminent so rest of the world forced Pakistan to withdraw Mujahideen and forces.
Go get a life you are probably a yellow traitor and pseudo liberal who feel proud my maligning their own homeland's name. Shame on you and now cry me a river
Go get a life you are looser.

if india and pakistan wanted a nuclear war it would have happened by now
Kiyoun isk e baad nuclear bombs ko keera lag jaye gha?
 
.
And the rest of the world will carry on.
It is predicted that A nuclear war between India and Pakistan would set off a global famine that could kill two billion people and effectively end human civilization..
1.3 billion Chinese people life will be at risk due to severe food shortage..
 
.
1.3 billion Chinese people life will be at risk due to severe food shortage.
And how this so called food shortage is related to Indo-Pak war? Chinese are independent in food sector they have enough to feed the whole China.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom