What's new

Has China taken over Pakistan?

I am sick of seeing comparisons between East India Company and the Chinese. Besides anything such comparison is nakedly false. As anybody will know the British invaded what is now Pakistan in 1849 and after the bloody battle of Gujrat they wrested the Sikh Empire into British India by integrating is through force of arms. The Chinese have not invaded Pakistan. They are trading so please stop with the cheap comparison.

Yes they might have arrived in Bengal under trade but what the frigg was that got to do with what is now Pakistan? Our destiny was either to be ruled by Sikhs or British and you guys know what happened.

Or are any of you sentimental of SIkh rule?

Ps. I am convinced that many of these papers publish articles that tickle Indian ego and massage their perceptions. This could be on account of the huge Indian internet population which means articles that attract Indians ratchets up the site visitor count and thus imcreases advert revenue. Dawn does this a lot. You know either the "me you the same" stories or "China taking Pak over" stories.
 
. . .
Aik to mujh se Indian ka Pakistan ke lye preshan hona dekha nehe jata. Kitney achey log hain ye Indian dushman ho ke bhi hamin cheekh cheekh ke hoshyar ker rehy hain

:rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
Seems likely the new Indian strategy is to buy out some Pakistani so called "academics" to write articles out of their arses.

If you read any of these articles... most of their arguments ate based on questions which they themselves answer without any supporting facts or evidence.

CPEC is going to change the the face of pakistan for the better... and Modi will have to change his wet Dhoti.

And these so called academics are are laughing all the way to the bank.

We live in an age of Fake News, Alternative Facts, and Trump. Where reality and appearances are usually opposite to each other.
 
.
I am sick of seeing comparisons between East India Company and the Chinese. Besides anything such comparison is nakedly false. As anybody will know the British invaded what is now Pakistan in 1849 and after the bloody battle of Gujrat they wrested the Sikh Empire into British India by integrating is through force of arms. The Chinese have not invaded Pakistan. They are trading so please stop with the cheap comparison.

Yes they might have arrived in Bengal under trade but what the frigg was that got to do with what is now Pakistan? Our destiny was either to be ruled by Sikhs or British and you guys know what happened.

Or are any of you sentimental of SIkh rule?

Ps. I am convinced that many of these papers publish articles that tickle Indian ego and massage their perceptions. This could be on account of the huge Indian internet population which means articles that attract Indians ratchets up the site visitor count and thus imcreases advert revenue. Dawn does this a lot. You know either the "me you the same" stories or "China taking Pak over" stories.




The British East India company is an irrelevant analogy to us. We are not indians nor are the Chinese British. Also, last I knew the British Empire did not help india become a nuclear weapons state.
 
. .
Yeah, that's pretty much what prevents Hindustan from invading Pakistan, and China from invading Hindustan.

If India is in a hot war with China Pakistan tries to open a second front. The threshold for Indian nuclear use will go down quite a bit.
 
. .
I am sick of seeing comparisons between East India Company and the Chinese. Besides anything such comparison is nakedly false. As anybody will know the British invaded what is now Pakistan in 1849 and after the bloody battle of Gujrat they wrested the Sikh Empire into British India by integrating is through force of arms. The Chinese have not invaded Pakistan. They are trading so please stop with the cheap comparison.

Yes they might have arrived in Bengal under trade but what the frigg was that got to do with what is now Pakistan? Our destiny was either to be ruled by Sikhs or British and you guys know what happened.

Or are any of you sentimental of SIkh rule?

Ps. I am convinced that many of these papers publish articles that tickle Indian ego and massage their perceptions. This could be on account of the huge Indian internet population which means articles that attract Indians ratchets up the site visitor count and thus imcreases advert revenue. Dawn does this a lot. You know either the "me you the same" stories or "China taking Pak over" stories.

You need to get your timelines straight

In 1612 if I was a Indian political advisor I would be telling my boss that the British have not attacked anyone too.
In 1612 East India Company was confined to three fishing villages Madras, Bombay and Calcutta

*The Chinese have not invaded Pakistan*
Not yet is the operative word here
 
.
You need to get your timelines straight

In 1612 if I was a Indian political advisor I would be telling my boss that the British have not attacked anyone too.
In 1612 East India Company was confined to three fishing villages Madras, Bombay and Calcutta

*The Chinese have not invaded Pakistan*
Not yet is the operative word here


And we should believe someone who comes from a nation whose state policy is to try to destroy Pakistan and it's people......:disagree:
 
.
You know i can write you a piece like this on the go with a counter theory.

Had China any plans to play with Pakistan's sovereignty Uncle Sam would be with us and instead of cricket we would be cheering baseball.

China has its own battles and these are bigger than yours. For them CPEC is key to keep their masses happy and employed and enough oil pouring in the country.

Don't believe me? Try and fiddle with the Gilgit sector of Pakistan. Find out yourself.

And those with invasion theory: any historical lesson you would learn is the people of the Indus are just guide. The bird has always been India.

So as the saying goes. Pick your kapoors well otherwise they maybe hard to swallow. Yes its a naughty joke. You can laugh

The problem why CPEC is a harder sell for Pakistan is the immense pressure the local politicians with vested foreign interests.

Count in Iran and UAE and Afghanistan to that who are having a hard time accepting the facts or are delaying the eventuality with their sheer arrogance.

Thanks to current middle east crisis it looks pretty positive if you ask me.
 
.
If India is in a hot war with China Pakistan tries to open a second front. The threshold for Indian nuclear use will go down quite a bit.

Obviously. Pakistan can only win a defensive war at the moment (although it would suffer nasty losses), and that's the way it has pretty much always been and probably will be for the foreseeable future.
 
.
If there's one way China is taking over, it's we take our collective future very seriously to invest that much money into infrastructure development, so we can create the basic of industrial building blocks that is so lacking in our region.

Just look at the number of countries interested in investing in Pakistan, after the motive of CPEC is made clear to them. Anyone want to say they are also interested in taking over Pakistan, or help China do it? :lol:
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom