It all seem to perfect to be true, just a few days ago a no fly zone was supported by the Arab League giving the impetus for a go ahead on it's implementation. Then as expected the mandate was broken with airstrikes from France on Libyan ground troops, and the resulting civilian casualties. And in remarkable turn of events, the AU came out with the harshest criticism, next Russia and China came out with their own protest, then Latin America voiced their horrors at civilian deaths incured, then even India came out in protest, now the biggest whammy of all The AL came out in full protest over the breaking of the UN resolution, and Iran who have been portraying Gadaffi as a monster all this while prior to the offensive did a full 180 turn and now scream Invasion! All this while Gaddafi has said he will now open his armaments to at least a million civilians and the specter of an uncontrollable civil war especially with the no man on the ground policy, tragedy and chaos brought about by the hasty decision of a no fly zone now loom large. If all these seems like a coincidence, it played out too perfectly to be true, the three blind mices have led themselves into another trap for greed.
Has a trap been laid to the imperialist in Libya? (england, France, USA)
- Thread starter Swatwolf
- Start date
desioptimist
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2010
- Messages
- 2,084
- Reaction score
- 0
Did India protest the civilian death? They only expressed concern.
Zeeshan360
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,297
- Reaction score
- 0
India didnt protest .
Everything is happening bcoz of Arab countries , they supported invasion of Libya
If Arab countries would have been against the invasion , Russia and China would have vetoed it
Everything is happening bcoz of Arab countries , they supported invasion of Libya
If Arab countries would have been against the invasion , Russia and China would have vetoed it
JayAtl
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2010
- Messages
- 8,812
- Reaction score
- -14
okay you show us any war your country has conducted where there is no civilian casualties? especially given that they use civilians as cover . FYI- the mandate allowed for firing upon troops too...read the mandate if you choose to debate it.
BTW where is your shock and despair for the thousands of innocent civilians being butchered by Qaddafi? selective outrage is sooooooo cute.
funny part was if US had done an IRAQ on Libya- the cry would be look the US is killing Muslims! now when it goes to protect innocent Muslims, its look they have had a few civilian casualties.
BTW where is your shock and despair for the thousands of innocent civilians being butchered by Qaddafi? selective outrage is sooooooo cute.
funny part was if US had done an IRAQ on Libya- the cry would be look the US is killing Muslims! now when it goes to protect innocent Muslims, its look they have had a few civilian casualties.
Similar threads
