Harris' Indian uncle may attend her swearing-in

[waz]

Hahaha this is going to be very interesting for the Modi administration, after kissing Trump's backside. There is going to a strong reset, the US isn't going to be so confrontational v China, oh and Kashmir has been highlighted by both, sending shockwaves among the Indian right.
Good news.


Even the Indian Defence Research Wing (IDRW) states: “Kamala Harris has some radical views on Kashmir, India needs to be cautious.”

We have to remind Kashmiris that they are not alone in the world. We are keeping track of the situation. There is a need to intervene if the situation demands, (Harris)

Further, in a policy paper posted on Biden’s campaign website in June this year, titled ‘Joe Biden’s agenda for Muslim American community’, the President-elect had asked the Indian government to take “all necessary steps to restore the rights of all the people of Kashmir”.

J&K parties hope Biden, Harris will maintain their stance on ‘wrongs done in Kashmir’

NC, PDP leaders say politics of polarisation are over with the victory of the Democrats in the US, which is a ‘clear defeat of Right-wing extremism’.

theprint.in

 

[Protest_again]

No a genuine question on how a person can be claimed as brahmin. Manu defined them apparently - no ?

No body cares what manu said. Indian constitution follows english common law. Putting seed inside her is a very crude and vulgar way of describing a marriage.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Well the black man put some seed in her mother who was a brahmin. what does your manu say about that ?

Nothing really. It's a smrithi, ignore it freely.

Hahaha this is going to be very interesting for the Modi administration, after kissing Trump's backside. There is going to a strong reset, the US isn't going to be so confrontational v China, oh and Kashmir has been highlighted by both, sending shockwaves among the Indian right.
Good news.

Yeah, I heard that before in the 2016 campaign that Trump is going to be tough on India. Based on two bit comments he made. LOL! The US was already confrontational of China during the Obama administration he had the pacific strategy to contain China with the help of his allies, Trump dismantled that plan and decided to take China on their own and equally took a strong stance against allies in Trade deal. This in fact helped China to deal with them individually which worked in their favor. Biden if he has plans to take on China, will be a collective effort without much noise.

The only instance the K-word found a mention was during the Trump administration who from time and time again offered to mediate between India and Pakistan which India firmly rejected. So... don't get your hopes high.

Her dad is black, so she's now Dalit in the Hindu caste system.

Skin color is not a term that defines caste, Pakistani

 

[Ali_Baba]

Biden will be good for the "muslim" world as it wont let Israel get away with as much as it does not right now. The Saudi's might be raising an eyebrow and Iran might be better off if the Americans rejoin the nuclear deal.

Will the new administration continue the sale of F-35s to UAE, given UAE's human rights record? That will be an interesting question.

Turkeys relationship with the Americans might be interesting to watch aswell.

Indians are happy over the potential influence her Indian uncle may have over her in the long run, that cannot be good for Pakistan for sure. I would not dismiss the influence this buys the Indians.

Biden, what ever his views in the past were as a free "agent", will be constrained by the security establishment in America who see the growth of India-USA ties as a counter to Chinese growth and influence, regardless of how ugly their Indian bride is. That trend line will continue, and relations, which are being built at institutional level, will only get stronger over time, regardless of who is in charge in the USA.

There is no good news for Pakistan here, and given the state of USA-Pakistan relations that occured under Obama, things may get a little worse. Best Pakistan can do, is to not get to involved with the new USA administration (or future admins). ie keep the relationship at arms lengh as you would with a skunk(or Indian ..).

 

[waz]

Nothing really. It's a smrithi, ignore it freely.

Yeah, I heard that before in the 2016 campaign that Trump is going to be tough on India. Based on two bit comments he made. LOL! The US was already confrontational of China during the Obama administration he had the pacific strategy to contain China with the help of his allies, Trump dismantled that plan and decided to take China on their own and equally took a strong stance against allies in Trade deal. This in fact helped China to deal with them individually which worked in their favor. Biden if he has plans to take on China, will be a collective effort without much noise.

The only instance the K-word found a mention was during the Trump administration who from time and time again offered to mediate between India and Pakistan which India firmly rejected. So... don't get your hopes high.

Skin color is not a term that defines caste, Pakistani

I understand you need to say that to make things better, it won’t. I don’t think you quite realise how deep of a hole they ( Modi and co) dug themselves here.
Under Obama it was a far less confrontational approach, certainly not mass tariffs and manoeuvring on taking bad China out.
The comments on Kashmir are eye opening.
It’s not us you need to tell to not get our hopes up, it’s your ruling class who are running headless right now.

 

[Chhatrapati]

I understand you need to say that to make things better, it won’t. I don’t think you quite realise how deep of a hole they ( Modi and co) dug themselves here.
Under Obama it was a far less confrontational approach, certainly not mass tariffs and manoeuvring on taking bad China out.
The comments on Kashmir are eye opening.
It’s not us you need to tell to not get our hopes up, it’s your ruling class who are running headless right now.

Hey It's not my words, that's what Biden said, what his foreign policies are going to be. I don't need to feel good, because our relationship with the US has been growing by leaps and bounds regardless of Trump, Obama or Biden.

Under Obama the relationship was already so bad, that when Trump came he had no clue how to handle it, so he went ahead with the whole trade war. If anyone expects Biden to be relaxed on China, they are terribly wrong, Biden's approach is detrimental to China than Trump's policies.

Our administration is probably the happiest to see Trump go. You're simply fantasizing as if it's India's loss.

 

[waz]

Hey It's not my words, that's what Biden said, what his foreign policies are going to be. I don't need to feel good, because our relationship with the US has been growing by leaps and bounds regardless of Trump, Obama or Biden.

Under Obama the relationship was already so bad, that when Trump came he had no clue how to handle it, so he went ahead with the whole trade war. If anyone expects Biden to be relaxed on China, they are terribly wrong, Biden's approach is detrimental to China than Trump's policies.

Our administration is probably the happiest to see Trump go. You're simply fantasizing as if it's India's loss.

I already put down Biden's words above, that's why you seem annoyed.
As for the relationship, let's wait and see.
Your administration is a joke, and banked on Trump winning. It's them who seem worried, go console them. I have no idea why you keep quoting me, if you 're not worried right?

 

[Chhatrapati]

I already put down Biden's words above, that's why you seem annoyed.
As for the relationship, let's wait and see.
Your administration is a joke, and banked on Trump winning. It's them who seem worried, go console them. I have no idea why you keep quoting me, if you 're not worried right?

All I can say is, wait, watch and see for yourselves. It has gotten to a cliche to say this, India enjoys bipartisan support in the US. And it has only grown stronger with Modi's policies who now don't seem to be mincing when it comes to signing deals which may seem impossible a decade back. A clear shift from non alliance stance.

I'm simply responding to your claims like "Indian admin is running like headless chicken, banked on Trump too much, Kashmeeeer", and I have no idea why you want me to be worried lol.

 

[waz]

All I can say is, wait, watch and see for yourselves. It has gotten to a cliche to say this, India enjoys bipartisan support in the US. And it has only grown stronger with Modi's policies who now don't seem to be mincing when it comes to signing deals which may seem impossible a decade back. A clear shift from non alliance stance.

I'm simply responding to your claims like "Indian admin is running like headless chicken, banked on Trump too much, Kashmeeeer", and I have no idea why you want me to be worried lol.

Yes wait and watch, I agree with that.
India enjoys bipartisan support does it, yes we all saw that massive support after Indian got smashed by China on the border coming out, not. Folks like you don't seem to understand that the US's pull for intervention and never ending support for foreign adventurism is now far less than it used to be. They want to fix and focus on home now. You'll come to realise this more and more.
What's with the whole "Kashmeeeer" mocking tone? Don't be angry at me, it's what the US president and his vice said. Here it is again;


We have to remind Kashmiris that they are not alone in the world. We are keeping track of the situation. There is a need to intervene if the situation demands, (Harris)

Further, in a policy paper posted on Biden’s campaign website in June this year, titled ‘Joe Biden’s agenda for Muslim American community’, the President-elect had asked the Indian government to take “all necessary steps to restore the rights of all the people of Kashmir”.


Would you like a translation in Hindi?
Don't be upset at me, please do forward your angst to your leader and ask them to explain themselves.

Why also do you use "lol" a great deal? You sound childish or nervous, or maybe both. I think I might have the answer;


Nervous laughter could also be a way to help us regulate our emotions. We usually feel more relaxed after we laugh, so a nervous chuckle when we’re feeling socially anxious can help to alleviate some of those negative emotions.

Why do people laugh when they’re nervous?

Asked by: Yasmin Hayes, London

www.sciencefocus.com

 

[Protest_again]

Yes wait and watch, I agree with that.
India enjoys bipartisan support does it, yes we all saw that massive support after Indian got smashed by China on the border coming out, not. Folks like you don't seem to understand that the US's pull for intervention and never ending support for foreign adventurism is now far less than it used to be. They want to fix and focus on home now. You'll come to realise this more and more.
What's with the whole "Kashmeeeer" mocking tone? Don't be angry at me, it's what the US president and his vice said. Here it is again;


We have to remind Kashmiris that they are not alone in the world. We are keeping track of the situation. There is a need to intervene if the situation demands, (Harris)

Further, in a policy paper posted on Biden’s campaign website in June this year, titled ‘Joe Biden’s agenda for Muslim American community’, the President-elect had asked the Indian government to take “all necessary steps to restore the rights of all the people of Kashmir”.


Would you like a translation in Hindi?
Don't be upset at me, please do forward your angst to your leader and ask them to explain themselves.

Why also do you use "lol" a great deal? You sound childish or nervous, or maybe both. I think I might have the answer;


Nervous laughter could also be a way to help us regulate our emotions. We usually feel more relaxed after we laugh, so a nervous chuckle when we’re feeling socially anxious can help to alleviate some of those negative emotions.

Why do people laugh when they’re nervous?

Asked by: Yasmin Hayes, London

www.sciencefocus.com

Obama said similar things before becoming president.

"Barack Obama has hit a raw nerve in India by suggesting the United States should try to help resolve the Kashmir dispute so that Pakistan can focus on hunting down Islamist militants on its north-western frontier — who in turn threaten stability in Afghanistan — rather than worrying about tensions with India on its eastern border. India is extremely sensitive to any suggestion of outside interference in Kashmir, which it sees as a bilateral dispute, though Pakistan itself has long chafed against this position."

“The most important thing we’re going to have to do with respect to Afghanistan, is actually deal with Pakistan,” Obama said in an interview last week with MSNBC. “And we’ve got work with the newly elected government there in a coherent way that says, terrorism is now a threat to you. Extremism is a threat to you. We should probably try to facilitate a better understanding between Pakistan and India and try to resolve the Kashmir crisis so that they can stay focused not on India, but on the situation with those militants.”

And now you do remember how many drone attacks and bombings happened in Obama period in Pakistan, right? Anything he did in Kashmir for you? You are clearly underestimating India. India of MMS was a reluctant ally to US, Modi is the one democrats want at the helm for bringing India and US closer. Do you really think American politicians would care for Kashmir when it serves them better with India as an ally against China?

 

[waz]

Obama said similar things before becoming president.




Barack Obama has hit a raw nerve in India by suggesting the United States should try to help resolve the Kashmir dispute so that Pakistan can focus on hunting down Islamist militants on its north-western frontier — who in turn threaten stability in Afghanistan — rather than worrying about tensions with India on its eastern border. India is extremely sensitive to any suggestion of outside interference in Kashmir, which it sees as a bilateral dispute, though Pakistan itself has long chafed against this position.

“The most important thing we’re going to have to do with respect to Afghanistan, is actually deal with Pakistan,” Obama said in an interview last week with MSNBC. “And we’ve got work with the newly elected government there in a coherent way that says, terrorism is now a threat to you. Extremism is a threat to you. We should probably try to facilitate a better understanding between Pakistan and India and try to resolve the Kashmir crisis so that they can stay focused not on India, but on the situation with those militants.”

And now you do remember how many drone attacks and bombings happened in Obama period in Pakistan, right? You are clearly underestimating India. India of MMS was a reluctant ally to US, Modi is the one democrats want at the helm for bringing India and US closer. Do you really think American politicians would care for Kashmir when ot serves them better with India as an ally against China?

You need to bring up the past, let's talk now.
Drone attacks, the stupid government allowed it, even when they were curtailed the Democrats didn't even let out a whimper. Also the drone war had ended by the start of 2016, aside a few select hits. Obama actually reduced the tally count. Trump came at he end of 2016, but didn't start office till the start of 2017.
For policy the democrats are led by newer faces now.
No one is saying they will forgo India over Kashmir but there will be issues if you keep a tight rein over Kashmir, basically keep it as a prison. They will do the same with China over it's handling of the uighur stuff.

 

[Protest_again]

You need to bring up the past, let's talk now.
Drone attacks, the stupid government allowed it, even when they were curtailed the Democrats didn't even let out a whimper. Also the drone war had ended by the start of 2016, aside a few select hits. Obama actually reduced the tally count. Trump came at he end of 2016, but didn't start office till the start of 2017.
For policy the democrats are led by newer faces now.
No one is saying they will forgo India over Kashmir but there will be issues if you keep a tight rein over Kashmir, basically keep it as a prison. They will do the same with China over it's handling of the uighur stuff.

We just have to wait and see.

 

[waz]

We just have to wait and see.

Of course I may completely wrong, might be a mix of things or what I suggested.

 

[Nadeem Ganjum]

Get ready guys, this sh*t's gonna stink.

 

[GHALIB]

she is Jamaican

Terry the fifth punjabi arab turk is jealous