What's new

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011!

You are the only Indian I have respect for in this forum. You're are too nice and humble to be Indian.

If all Indians were like him, we'd have been buried 50 years ago. There's no way India could lose to China with its much better geography and resources if even a fraction of India's leadership was like him.
 
.
China holds 903 patents for Long Term Evolution (LTE) 4G mobile communications technology

eH9JY.jpg

China holds 903 LTE 4G patents for mobile communications.

Chinese companies snapping at South Korea's heels

"Chinese companies snapping at South Korea’s heels

Companies from China have narrowed technology gap to 3.7 years and become serious competitors

By Ryu Yi-keun, staff writer
Posted on : Apr.3,2012 11:19 KST

Samsung Electronics vice chairman Choi Ji-sung has confessed to feeling “nervous” about the performance of Chinese companies. “They’re doing the same things we were ten years ago,” Choi explained.

Choi made the comments while attending the 2012 Mobile World Congress last month in Barcelona. At the event, the Samsung Electronics booth was sandwiched between Chinese firms ZTE and Huawei. Chinese companies that had been absent from the exhibition a few years before were now occupying center stage.

ZTE and Huawei ranked fifth and sixth in worldwide mobile phone sales for 2012, coming in behind Nokia, Samsung, Apple, and LG. ZTE passed LG in sales for 4Q11.

Competitive prices and rapid technological improvement are behind the Chinese companies’ swift ascent. China now holds 903 patents for the Long Term Evolution 4G mobile communications technology, putting it third behind the US’s 1,904 and South Korea’s 1,124.

China has been rapidly narrowing the technological gap with South Korea, not just in information and communications but in most areas. A Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (KIET) brief on March industry trends Monday showed the technology gap between South Korean manufacturers and Chinese ones to be 3.7 years. The gap has been steadily narrowing since KIET conducted its first such study in 2002, falling from 4.7 years then to 4.0 in 2004 and 3.8 in 2007. At this rate, it has narrowed by roughly one year every decade. The latest study examined 628 small, medium, and large companies between June and October of 2011.

The gap was smallest in information and communications at 2.9 years, and largest in light industries at 4 years. The results suggest far faster progress by Chinese businesses in cutting-edge industry. In particular, the technology gap in the area of semiconductors was just 2.4 years.

An R&D director at one South Korean cell phone company said, “The Chinese companies have been coming on strong and are now a threat.

"Since everyone but Apple uses the same Google Android operating system for smartphones, the late-starting Chinese businesses have fewer technological elements to deal with, which has narrowed the technology gap," the director explained.

The number of companies surveyed who reported China being even or ahead in technology was also up sharply from 8.4% in 2007 to 13.8% in 2011. And while the number saying South Korea was five to six years ahead of China was up slightly by 1.4 percentage points from four years before. The number giving South Korea as being three to four years ahead was down fully 5.2 percentage points to 30%. KIET associate research fellow Lee Won-bok, who supervised the study, said, "The problem is that China is catching up with us far faster than South Korea is narrowing the technology gap with the global standard.

“Another big factor is that our technology is focused too much on production and development with an eye to commercialization and short-term effects, and we’ve neglected basic and original technology,” Lee added.

An analysis last year had South Korean manufacturers’ technology level at 81.3% of the world’s best, up slightly from the 79.7% recorded in 2002.

Please direct questions or comments to [englishhani@hani.co.kr]"
 
.
kid read post 110 before showing more of your Indian argument (which is load of shyte just like all your cities I have been to)

China most innovative!! who cares.. Here is the baby steps to check your eye efficiency.

font size 2.

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011

font size 3.

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011

font size 4.

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011

font size 5

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011


And now answer my question. How China beat Germany where the data provided by the poster clearly shows in 2011 China has got 3786 patents and Germany 12968 ?. Is it norm for Commies that add others achievements to bolts the ego..
 
.
China most innovative!! who cares.. Here is the baby steps to check your eye efficiency.

font size 2.

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011

font size 3.

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011

font size 4.

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011

font size 5

Greater China (14,351 U.S. patents) beats Germany again in 2011


And now answer my question. How China beat Germany where the data provided by the poster clearly shows in 2011 China has got 3786 patents and Germany 12968 ?. Is it norm for Commies that add others achievements to bolts the ego..

I think your illiteracy is preventing you from seeing the truth. WIPO patents are what are important overall which China does beat Germany on. China + Taiwan = Greater China. Taiwan has more US patents because 99% of Taiwanese businessmen rather patent in US than Taiwan because there's no point patenting anything in Taiwan and most Taiwanese businessmen have US backgrounds. Whereas very few Chinese businesses patent in the US because they're domestic companies and have global presence.
 
.
Greater China behaves like one economic entity

At Ironman, there is a reason that BusinessWeek and I refer to Greater China. Most of the Taiwanese patents are not being implemented in Taiwan. Instead, the Taiwanese patents are being put to use in mainland China.

For example, Taiwan has numerous patents for notebook computers. The world's two largest computer notebook original design manufacturers (ODM) are Taiwan's Quanta and Compal. However, all manufacturing/assembly of notebook computers have been moved off Taiwan. Instead, the Taiwanese companies are producing 90% of the world's notebook computers in China.

Therefore, it is mainland Chinese engineers that are working with Taiwanese technology. As they gain experience, those mainland engineers will push the technological boundaries and discover new patents of their own. Hence, it makes sense to discuss Greater China as an entity and to tally its cumulative patents.

http://www.digitimes.com/topic/taiwan_notebook_odms/a00176.html

"Taiwan notebook Original Design Manufacturers (ODMs) account for more than 90% of global notebook production and Digitimes is there to provide daily updates on shipments, supplier contracts and financial data on the more than 10 Taiwan makers involved in notebook manufacturing.

Last update: Tuesday 3 April 2012 [2122 news items]"

http://www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=10292

"Shanghai/Suzhou area of eastern China. By 2005, over 80% of the world's notebook computers were produced by Taiwanese firms, almost entirely in China ..."
 
.
China is the world superpower in chemistry patents

G51yz.jpg

Chinese artemisinin antimalarial drug (which is a Chinese chemistry patent) "has saved millions of lives across the globe, especially in the developing world."

References:

Tu Youyou, Controversial 'Mother of Artemisinin'

New York Times: Chinese artemisinin scientists being talked for Nobel Prize

----------

China Leads All Nations in Publication of Chemical Patents According to CAS

"China Leads All Nations in Publication of Chemical Patents According to CAS, the World's Most Authoritative Publisher of Chemical Information

Columbus, Ohio (November 23, 2009) - Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), the global expert on chemical information, reports that China's patent office is now the world's leading producer of patent invention applications in chemistry. China trailed Japan's patent office, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for more than a decade, but passed the USPTO in 2005, WIPO in 2006, and exceeded Japan for the first time on a monthly basis in 2008. In 2009, China will record an entire year as the number one producer of chemical patents, and CAS projects that trend to continue.

"Chemistry is widely recognized as 'the central science,'" according to Dr. Matthew Toussant, senior vice president of editorial operations at CAS. "Chemical patents are a critical component to many industrial processes and scientific realms, including medicine and natural products," said Toussant. "In fact, on average, 35 percent of new patent invention applications involve chemical substances."

"CAS has been recording the phenomenal growth of patent documents in the last decade, with the number of chemistry-related patent publications by the USPTO and WIPO growing by more than 500 percent," said Christine McCue, vice president of marketing at CAS. "Meanwhile, Chinese invention applications increased by nearly 1,400 percent, with much of that growth taking place in the pharmaceutical sector. More than half of the Chinese patent applications during this period were from inventors within China, which surely indicates that Chinese scientists now also recognize the importance of monetizing research discoveries."

Hundreds of CAS scientists, aided by state-of-the-art technology, identify and record the chemistry obscured in patents that standard search engines cannot locate. Proprietary technology systems developed by CAS enable scientists working around the world to analyze patents from 60 global patent authorities. Patent documents meeting CAS selection criteria from nine major patent offices are available in CAS databases within two days of the patents' issuance, and are fully indexed in less than 27 days. CAS scientists add value to the data they collect, entering chemical names, a unique CAS Registry Number, literature references, property data, commercial availability, preparation details, spectra, and regulatory information from international sources into CAS databases.

Media Contact

Crystal Poole Bradley
614-447-3611
cas-pr@cas.org"

----------

China forges ahead

China Now Ahead Of US In Patenting And Commercialization Of Bioethanol

"China Now Ahead Of US In Patenting And Commercialization Of Bioethanol
by Staff Writers
Columbus OH (SPX) Jun 30, 2010

bioethanolcornoilethano.jpg

File image. [Corn-oil ethanol biofuel]

Chemical Abstracts Service reports that in 2009, China surpassed all other countries in the production of bioethanol patents, emerging as the global leader in the commercialization of bioethanol research.

In the CAS Chemistry Research Report: China Takes Lead in the Commercialization of Bioethanol, CAS examines 40 years of scientific research into biofuel development. Their key finding is that although U.S. researchers continue to publish more scientific research about bioethanol than other countries, China now produces more bioethanol-related patents than anyone. Other important findings include:

+ The U.S. published 105 journal articles related to first- and second-generation bioethanol research in 2009, more than any other country.

+ However, in the same year, the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China issued the most bioethanol-related patent documents (156).

+ From 2000 to 2009, global research literature on second-generation bioethanol (derived from non-food sources, such as wheat stalks) grew 586 percent, including patenting activity that skyrocketed 2,341 percent.

+ Research into second-generation bioethanol significantly outpaced examination of first-generation (derived from edible feedstocks) and third-generation (derived from algae) bioethanol.

+ U.S. researchers are foremost within the newest category of bioethanol research: third-generation, or algae-based, bioethanol.

"The global research focus on second-generation bioethanol shows a rising interest in a category of fuels widely considered more sustainable, affordable, and environmentally friendly than bioethanol available today," said Christine McCue, vice president of marketing at CAS."
 
.
China holds 903 patents for Long Term Evolution (LTE) 4G mobile communications technology

eH9JY.jpg

China holds 903 LTE 4G patents for mobile communications.

Chinese companies snapping at South Korea's heels

"Chinese companies snapping at South Korea’s heels

Companies from China have narrowed technology gap to 3.7 years and become serious competitors

By Ryu Yi-keun, staff writer
Posted on : Apr.3,2012 11:19 KST

Samsung Electronics vice chairman Choi Ji-sung has confessed to feeling “nervous” about the performance of Chinese companies. “They’re doing the same things we were ten years ago,” Choi explained.

Choi made the comments while attending the 2012 Mobile World Congress last month in Barcelona. At the event, the Samsung Electronics booth was sandwiched between Chinese firms ZTE and Huawei. Chinese companies that had been absent from the exhibition a few years before were now occupying center stage.

ZTE and Huawei ranked fifth and sixth in worldwide mobile phone sales for 2012, coming in behind Nokia, Samsung, Apple, and LG. ZTE passed LG in sales for 4Q11.

Competitive prices and rapid technological improvement are behind the Chinese companies’ swift ascent. China now holds 903 patents for the Long Term Evolution 4G mobile communications technology, putting it third behind the US’s 1,904 and South Korea’s 1,124.

China has been rapidly narrowing the technological gap with South Korea, not just in information and communications but in most areas. A Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (KIET) brief on March industry trends Monday showed the technology gap between South Korean manufacturers and Chinese ones to be 3.7 years. The gap has been steadily narrowing since KIET conducted its first such study in 2002, falling from 4.7 years then to 4.0 in 2004 and 3.8 in 2007. At this rate, it has narrowed by roughly one year every decade. The latest study examined 628 small, medium, and large companies between June and October of 2011.

The gap was smallest in information and communications at 2.9 years, and largest in light industries at 4 years. The results suggest far faster progress by Chinese businesses in cutting-edge industry. In particular, the technology gap in the area of semiconductors was just 2.4 years.

An R&D director at one South Korean cell phone company said, “The Chinese companies have been coming on strong and are now a threat.

"Since everyone but Apple uses the same Google Android operating system for smartphones, the late-starting Chinese businesses have fewer technological elements to deal with, which has narrowed the technology gap," the director explained.

The number of companies surveyed who reported China being even or ahead in technology was also up sharply from 8.4% in 2007 to 13.8% in 2011. And while the number saying South Korea was five to six years ahead of China was up slightly by 1.4 percentage points from four years before. The number giving South Korea as being three to four years ahead was down fully 5.2 percentage points to 30%. KIET associate research fellow Lee Won-bok, who supervised the study, said, "The problem is that China is catching up with us far faster than South Korea is narrowing the technology gap with the global standard.

“Another big factor is that our technology is focused too much on production and development with an eye to commercialization and short-term effects, and we’ve neglected basic and original technology,” Lee added.

An analysis last year had South Korean manufacturers’ technology level at 81.3% of the world’s best, up slightly from the 79.7% recorded in 2002.

Please direct questions or comments to [englishhani@hani.co.kr]"

China's LTE technology is different from the other LTE technologies. The LTE used in Verizon's US network is 3GPP-LTE, which is different from China's TD-LTE.

3GPP Long Term Evolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Time-Division Long-Term Evolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
I think your illiteracy is preventing you from seeing the truth. WIPO patents are what are important overall which China does beat Germany on. China + Taiwan = Greater China. Taiwan has more US patents because 99% of Taiwanese businessmen rather patent in US than Taiwan because there's no point patenting anything in Taiwan and most Taiwanese businessmen have US backgrounds. Whereas very few Chinese businesses patent in the US because they're domestic companies and have global presence.

Don't show your ignorance to the public. You says WIPO ? have you ever checked their data ? If not, here it for you genius. From Martian2's chest thumbing posts itself..

qcY3I.jpg


International Patent Filings Set New Record in 2011

See the red marked one , now tell me who is above you :lol:. This is the top 15 list, can you spot Taiwan here?. Add up the 15th country's application ie Spain, still you behind them. So even if Taiwan came in 16th position you are still behind the Germans.

This will be my last post in this thread. I rest my case.
 
.
At Ironman, I think you misunderstood FairAndUnbiased.

I believe his argument is that if Taiwan was allowed to file WIPO patents then Greater China's WIPO patent applications would easily exceed Germany's total. This would be a true statement. If we use Taiwan's 9,907 U.S. granted patents as a benchmark then we would have to add almost 10,000 to Greater China's total WIPO patent applications.

Currently, Taiwanese patents and its related economic activity on mainland China are not reflected in the WIPO data. This creates a misleading picture of China's true economic strength.
 
.
Don't show your ignorance to the public. You says WIPO ? have you ever checked their data ? If not, here it for you genius. From Martian2's chest thumbing posts itself..

qcY3I.jpg


International Patent Filings Set New Record in 2011

See the red marked one , now tell me who is above you :lol:. This is the top 15 list, can you spot Taiwan here?. Add up the 15th country's application ie Spain, still you behind them. So even if Taiwan came in 16th position you are still behind the Germans.

This will be my last post in this thread. I rest my case.

Caus those are only the applications, not all of them are accepted
 
.
Back
Top Bottom