Razia Sultana
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
- Messages
- 1,298
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
You only view conversion as a vice. What about the politician who is accepting money and selling the nation? What about VHP and Bajrang Dal who take money and vitiate the national harmony? So if foreign funding is doing more harm than good, then who is supposed to take action against it? Just because my party will get Rs.100 crore from abroad, let me allow Rs.1000 crore that will harm our nation. You only quote a pastor but do you know how much BJP and congress earn thru this foreign funding and they dont allow any audit of their accounts.Ok .Right wing groups also gets foreign fund from abroad.But how much they can do that ? AFAIK there is no other nation in this world having majority rich Hindus with an official religion.
But you cant say that about Arabs (sinking in oil money ) and rich West.Right ?
Recently a pastor in my state faced a legal action because of illegal trabnsaction of money .He has arouns 1000 crore of assets and accounts in Swiss banks .All these have only one purpose.Conversion .
At any case VHP dont have 1000 crore assets.Some particular cases are Mata Amrithanda Mayi Devi but they dont have any religious conversion tactics.
I agree with you.SC/ST will get privileges without any religion problem.
But the day when they get the official approval they will try for mass conversion.
And who says hindus are not converting? I have been to Mata Amritanandmayi Devi's center in Kerala and found many foreigners as her bhakta. ISCKON has converted many to Krishna Bhakti worldwide and so many Gurus and religious leaders are doing it every where.
And lastly I am most upset with your last sentence. Caste hindus have kept the SCs at fringes for thousands of years and now they dare call them to be fence sitters. It also reflects how little you know about them. If they had to leave their religion, they could have done it long ago under muslim rules and christian missionaries. Then we still practiced untouchability and they did not have any Ambedkar or reservation. I think they are more deep rooted to this soil than anyone else. They are so attached to their village or community deity than any brahmin to a temple. They may not be allowed entry in a temple but their faith for the deity is intact. Your assessment is based on their maltreatment within hinduism but perhaps you dont realize that their faith is more deep rooted in the religion of their soil which is now considered part of hinduism.