What's new

Goods than good have to throw! India hate China "Xialong"!

USA and Israel does not have the Tejas airframe and other IP to induct it
China has everything needed to build the JF-17

Not everything, Pakistan is also getting engines and avionics from different sources.
 
. .
china has equivalents for engines and avionics

and the US and Israel can get the air-frames from India.........you see what ever you throw at me, i will be able to rebound it back.

At the end of the day JF-17s doesn't suit the PLAAF requirements just like Tejas doesn't suit the US and Israel requirements.
 
.
@wiseone2

Last night he was arguing same for J-31 that China will not induct J-31 so its not a good aircraft.
Now i dont want to troll but when you come up with your 3 decades old tejas... Then ask something again....
 
.
PLAAF is operating hundreds of J-7s which are MiG-21s
you are telling me that some how the JF-17 is not good enough to replace them
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Liberation_Army_Air_Force#Aircraft_inventory

i can draw one of two conclusions
China's engine technology is bad. jf-17 without RD-93 is not good for PLAAF

JF-17 is not a great aircraft
What a fool you are sir JF-17 is specifically built for Pakistan, they are replacing J-7 and J-8 with J-10
they want heavies and medium weight fighter, they don't want not induct light weight jet and btw they are developing WS-13 for JF-17 and J-31, OK JF-17 is isn't a great jet now happy:p:, and go worship your cow-piss, vedic , out of this universe 100000000000 generation Tejas:lol::rofl::suicide::suicide2::sarcastic:
 
.
For example, the Israeli production of radar systems can only guide the Israeli and American Standard missiles, want to launch a Russian made missiles is not possible. Radar, flight control system, data link and other important systems of LCA, are from different countries of the various manufacturers, cannot completely solve the compatibility problems. All kinds of faults and defects of LCA the principle of fundamental reason emerge in an endless stream, it is unable to grasp all equipment, simple combination stack can only bring unpredictable disaster.

R73

R73

 
.
@wiseone2

Last night he was arguing same for J-31 that China will not induct J-31 so its not a good aircraft.
Now i dont want to troll but when you come up with your 3 decades old tejas... Then ask something again....

i have no comment about j-31 since it has not been released
china has made it clear j-31 is inferior to j-20

and the US and Israel can get the air-frames from India.........you see what ever you throw at me, i will be able to rebound it back.

At the end of the day JF-17s doesn't suit the PLAAF requirements just like Tejas doesn't suit the US and Israel requirements.

The JF-17 is chinese project
The tejas is not an American/Israeli project
 
.
The JF-17 is chinese project
I think if you have read the article it was a 50-50 partnership ... China dont need it because it does not suite their requirements so they modiified and made J-10
 
.
i have no comment about j-31 since it has not been released
china has made it clear j-31 is inferior to j-20



The JF-17 is chinese project
The tejas is not an American/Israeli project
China is say nothing about J-31, its role is different from J-20, J-20 is a air superiority jet whereas J-31oriented toward multi-role job, just like F-22, F-35 combo
The tejas is not an American/Israeli project
but not also indian, 99% Tejas is foreign, oh i forget your beloved crapy 1000000 generation Tejas comes from Andromeda Galaxy:lol::rofl::rofl::sarcastic:
 
.
JF17 was built for Pakistan and on Chinese side it was invested so they could export it instead of their own use. Example is Myanmar bought from china instead if Pakistan.
 
.
I think if you have read the article it was a 50-50 partnership ... China dont need it because it does not suite their requirements so they modiified and made J-10

what did pakistan exactly do on JF-17 ? I forgot PAF wrote a spec sheet
 
. .
what did pakistan exactly do on JF-17 ? I forgot PAF wrote a spec sheet
its joint project you fool 500 million $ was provided by pakistan, rest is Chinese,PAF/PAC is giving their project specifications to Chinese company

Do on or do with..???
Elaborate
bro he just trolling against Pakistan and China Please ignore him
 
.
its joint project you fool 500 million $ was provided by pakistan, rest is Chinese,PAF/PAC is giving their project specifications to Chinese company


bro he just trolling against Pakistan and China Please ignore him

okay you funded it
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom