What's new

GlobalTimes: Calls mount to lift family planning policy after census reports low population growth, deepening aging problem

Hamartia Antidote

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
35,188
Reaction score
30
Country
United States
Location
United States

Calls to adjust population policies such as removing the decades-long family planning policy mounted among some demographers on Tuesday, after the country released its once-a-decade population census results, which showed that the Chinese mainland's population is growing more slowly and the aging population is expanding.

Chinese demographers said that the seventh population census results were released as China's population development entered a critical turning point with a rapidly aging population and a five-decade trend of population growth was about to end, and will provide an important reference for China's population and economic policy adjustment as well as plans to raise the retirement age, which may come in a year or two.

The Chinese mainland population grew to 1.412 billion in 2020, up from 1.4 billion at the end of 2019. From 2010 to 2020, the Chinese mainland's population grew 72.06 million, or 5.38 percent, compared with the 1.34 billion recorded in the previous census (from 2000 to 2010) conducted a decade ago.

Chinese demographers said that although China reported population growth in 2020, the general declining trend was inevitable. Some demographers said China's population is likely to start to decline by 2027, but some put it as early as 2022.

He Yafu, an independent demographer, told the Global Times that there is no doubt that China will fully lift family planning policy in the near future to cope with the declining birth rate, and China is likely to remove its family planning policy as early as this autumn during the sixth plenary session of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC).

Lu Jiehua, a professor of sociology at Peking University, told the Global Times on Tuesday that China's population structure has been changing since the fifth population census in 2000, and we need comprehensive social policies to cope with the new population development paths.

"Among those policies, further improving or lifting the family planning policy was at the top of the policy list," Lu said.

He said that other policies such as raising the retirement age and speeding up establishment of a service system for elderly people as well as lowering child-raising costs need to be introduced.

Fully lifting the family planning policy will not be enough to avert a fall in China's total population, or prevent China from becoming another Japan, demographers said, noting that China should come up with more measures to encourage childbirth, such as subsidizing couples who choose to have more than one child.

Peking University professor Liang Jianzhang's advice to reward a million yuan ($155,499) to each newborn sparked wide discussions online, and the hashtag made the most searched topic list on Weibo on Tuesday night.

Liang said that to raise China's fertility rate to the replacement level of 2.1 from current 1.3, China needs to spend 10 percent of its GDP to encourage births.

China's GDP was around 100 trillion yuan, and the government needs to reward 1 million yuan for each newborn if China wants to have 10 million extra newborns every year, Liang said, adding that this reward could be in the form of cash, subsidy in purchasing a home or a deduction in social insurance.
 
. .

Calls to adjust population policies such as removing the decades-long family planning policy mounted among some demographers on Tuesday, after the country released its once-a-decade population census results, which showed that the Chinese mainland's population is growing more slowly and the aging population is expanding.

Chinese demographers said that the seventh population census results were released as China's population development entered a critical turning point with a rapidly aging population and a five-decade trend of population growth was about to end, and will provide an important reference for China's population and economic policy adjustment as well as plans to raise the retirement age, which may come in a year or two.

The Chinese mainland population grew to 1.412 billion in 2020, up from 1.4 billion at the end of 2019. From 2010 to 2020, the Chinese mainland's population grew 72.06 million, or 5.38 percent, compared with the 1.34 billion recorded in the previous census (from 2000 to 2010) conducted a decade ago.

Chinese demographers said that although China reported population growth in 2020, the general declining trend was inevitable. Some demographers said China's population is likely to start to decline by 2027, but some put it as early as 2022.

He Yafu, an independent demographer, told the Global Times that there is no doubt that China will fully lift family planning policy in the near future to cope with the declining birth rate, and China is likely to remove its family planning policy as early as this autumn during the sixth plenary session of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC).

Lu Jiehua, a professor of sociology at Peking University, told the Global Times on Tuesday that China's population structure has been changing since the fifth population census in 2000, and we need comprehensive social policies to cope with the new population development paths.

"Among those policies, further improving or lifting the family planning policy was at the top of the policy list," Lu said.

He said that other policies such as raising the retirement age and speeding up establishment of a service system for elderly people as well as lowering child-raising costs need to be introduced.

Fully lifting the family planning policy will not be enough to avert a fall in China's total population, or prevent China from becoming another Japan, demographers said, noting that China should come up with more measures to encourage childbirth, such as subsidizing couples who choose to have more than one child.

Peking University professor Liang Jianzhang's advice to reward a million yuan ($155,499) to each newborn sparked wide discussions online, and the hashtag made the most searched topic list on Weibo on Tuesday night.

Liang said that to raise China's fertility rate to the replacement level of 2.1 from current 1.3, China needs to spend 10 percent of its GDP to encourage births.

China's GDP was around 100 trillion yuan, and the government needs to reward 1 million yuan for each newborn if China wants to have 10 million extra newborns every year, Liang said, adding that this reward could be in the form of cash, subsidy in purchasing a home or a deduction in social insurance.
Mfers why you silent on Palestine? Is this your only job. Both of you Chinese and American mfers.

Oh wait both of you together kill muslims.
 
.
Mfers why you silent on Palestine? Is this your only job. Both of you Chinese and American mfers.

Oh wait both of you together kill muslims.

Hey why are you silent on this genocide you f'n hypocrite.


Are you making it MY job to do the world genocide reporting you lazy #$%^!

Get off your @ss and do it yourself!!
 
.
Hey why are you silent on this genocide you f'n hypocrite.


Are you making it MY job to do the reporting you lazy #$%^!

Get off you @ss and do it!!
Yea they are fuckin terrorists. There we don't condone terrorists. We don't condone khwarijiites.

On the other hand. I challenge you to say once. Israel is a terrorist state. Once. Otherwise stfu about XinJiang two faced scum.
 
.
Yea they are fuckin terrorists. There we don't condone terrorists. We don't condone khwarijiites.

On the other hand. I challenge you to say once. Israel is a terrorist state. Once.

Hey if they are killing innocent civilians then sure they are a terrorist state to their own people.

Otherwise stfu about XinJiang two faced scum.

Go ruin another thread please...


Oh and don't forget to create a thread about the Nigerian massacre...I challenge YOU on that. We'll see the real two faced scum. You'd probably jump out a window first before making such a post.

We can all refresh this search to see if the "finger pointer" actually does anything himself (yeah right).
 
Last edited:
. .
Ultimately all industrialized nations go through this phase, but one child policy accelerated this for the China. 2 Child policy did not show any improvements in the birthrates because the cost of living has increased. People would rather have one child who can they can provide a good education and life to than 2 children for whom they couldn't. Financial incentive could show some improvements, but they haven't helped Russia and Japan much. Let's see how Beijing tackles this problem.
 
.
Ultimately all industrialized nations go through this phase, but one child policy accelerated this for the China. 2 Child policy did not show any improvements in the birthrates because the cost of living has increased. People would rather have one child who can they can provide a good education and life to than 2 children for whom they couldn't. Financial incentive could show some improvements, but they haven't helped Russia and Japan much. Let's see how Beijing tackles this problem.
too little too late. they should have lifted it at least 2 decades ago.
 
. .
They should enforce it again as Mao envisioned it, IMO.
So 6 children per family? Mao wanted the Chinese to have many children.

Under Deng, the one Child policy went into effect, not Mao.
 
.
So 6 children per family? Mao wanted the Chinese to have many children.

Under Deng, the one Child policy went into effect, not Mao.

Deng was Mao's protégé, was he not (before he fell out of favor)? Once the need for canon fodder for the Revolution was over, the communists wanted less children.
 
.
They should enforce it again as Mao envisioned it, IMO.
Actually, cant blame Mao. The truth is that it was the most stupid thing to do when Deng came up with this dictatorial drastic inhumane genocidal one child policy( tens of millions of Chinese women/couple have been forced to kill their unborn babies this way, leading to the death of hundreds of millions of Chinese citizens who were deprived of their chance to life). THIS IS ACTUALLY THE LARGEST GENOCIDAL POLICY MANKIND HAS EVER SEEN if we look at it from this perspective. That's the not even counting the social issues this policy has led to(tens of millions of Chinese men will never be able to find a wife since men outnumber women there by a wide margin due to this policy), and the psychological/societal issues faced by being an only child without siblings at all and all the pressure that entails(you have to support your parents/family alone when they are old). etc etc
The thing they forgot is that without China's large population, the country won't be where it is today as well. At best it would have been another South Korea or Japan, nothing more. No way they would have been aiming for world leadership/superpower to one day match the US. Their huge population is also one of the main reason they stand a chance to one day displaced the U.S since their scale is simply too large.
However, the one child policy has precipitated and fast forward their aging population by decades ahead, since if that policy was never implemented then China will still have among the most youthful population on earth today and all that entails for their future. Granted as they grew wealthy birth rates would have slowed down eventually. So there was no point implementing this crazy policy for so long, since diminishing return(birth rates) would have set in at one point anyway. They just moved forward the inevitable.
 
Last edited:
. .
It was a stupid policy which should’ve been repealed decades ago

go to China and make babies ..and get rich..sounds like a good plan to me. :enjoy:
c’mon 157 k$ is a lot of money in China.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom