What's new

Global fire power top 10

narcon

BANNED
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
0
Russia Military Strength


land6.png


land8.png
 
. . .
1,2,3 is good and really strong. For rest
-
-
-
-
-
Huge gap.
 
. . .
1,2,3 is good and really strong. For rest
-
-
-
-
-
Huge gap
-
-
-
-
-
---_----_

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-Light year Gap -
-
[-
-
-
-
-

oIo(Bangladesh)oio

But BD Army is trained ;)
 
. .
GFP only looks at numbers. it does not account hardware quality, terrain, doctrines and experiance, all of which are more important

Difference between 3 & 4 is hell high..
not as much as you think. indians have a tendency to grossly overestimate china because of what happened in 1962
 
. .
GFP only looks at numbers. it does not account hardware quality, terrain, doctrines and experiance, all of which are more important


not as much as you think. indians have a tendency to grossly overestimate china because of what happened in 1962

The GDP difference between the US and China is 2.5 times. The GDP difference between China and India is 4 times.

The GDP per capita difference between US and Mexico is 4 times. The GDP per capita difference between China and India is 4.5 times.

The scientific publication number difference between US and China is 1:1 (equal numbers approximately). The ratio between US and India is 10:1.
 
. .
The GDP difference between the US and China is 2.5 times. The GDP difference between China and India is 4 times.

The GDP per capita difference between US and Mexico is 4 times. The GDP per capita difference between China and India is 4.5 times.

The scientific publication number difference between US and China is 1:1 (equal numbers approximately). The ratio between US and India is 10:1.
dear unfairandbiased, every stat from china is a joke

CARSON BLOCK: China's Fake GDP Is Over-Inflated By 25% | Business Insider India

Chinese GDP a case of 'fake it ‘til you make it' - Telegraph

Faking of scientific papers on an industrial scale in China : science

"AP reports that plagiarizing or faking results is so rampant in Chinese academia that some experts worry it could hinder China's efforts to become a leader in science. China's state-run media recently rejoiced over reports that China publishes more papers in international journals than any other country except the US; but not all the research stands up to scrutiny. In December, a British journal retracted 70 papers from a Chinese university, all by the same two lead scientists, saying the work had been fabricated, and expressing amazement that a fake crystal structure would be submitted for publication. 'Academic fraud, misconduct and ethical violations are very common in China,' said professor Rao Yi, dean of the life sciences school at Peking University. 'It is a big problem.' Last month the Education Ministry released guidelines for forming a 35-member watchdog committee and has asked universities to get tough but Rao remains skeptical. Government ministries are happy to fund research but not to police it, Rao says. 'The authorities don't want to be the bad guy.'"
China's Research Ambitions Hurt By Faked Results - Slashdot


By volume the output of Chinese science is impressive. Mainland Chinese researchers have published a steadily increasing share of scientific papers in journals included in the prestigious Science Citation Index (SCI—maintained by Thomson Reuters, a publisher). The number grew from a negligible share in 2001 to 9.5% in 2011, second in the world to America, according to a report published by the Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China. From 2002 to 2012, more than 1m Chinese papers were published in SCI journals; they ranked sixth for the number of times cited by others. Nature, a science journal, reported that in 2012 the number of papers from China in the journal’s 18 affiliated research publications rose by 35% from 2011. The journal said this “adds to the growing body of evidence that China is fast becoming a global leader in scientific publishing and scientific research”.

In 2010, however, Nature had also noted rising concerns about fraud in Chinese research, reporting that in one Chinese government survey, a third of more than 6,000 scientific researchers at six leading institutions admitted to plagiarism, falsification or fabrication. The details of the survey have not been publicly released, making it difficult to compare the results fairly with Western surveys, which have also found that one-third of scientists admit to dishonesty under the broadest definition, but that a far smaller percentage (2% on average) admit to having fabricated or falsified research results.


Scientific research: Looks good on paper | The Economist

and thats just the ones we know about. we dont know about the ones we dont know about

But BD Army is trained ;)
in what?
 
Last edited:
.
1,2,3 is good and really strong. For rest
-
-
-
-
-
Huge gap.

No difference between 1 and rest are huge.
US have 11 CBG 1000 most modern fightrs in Navy itself.In addition 3000 to USAF also.
 
.
Ban Global Firepower coz it does not take into consideration,the power of "Roohaani soldiers,on horses" with "shining swords"
 
.
Back
Top Bottom