George Cross sale put off: Official

[third eye]

Tuesday, December 1, 2009 20:28 IST

London: The auctioning of an Indian soldier's 'George Cross' medal for bravery has been put off due to a probe into its ownership, an official linked to the sale said today.

"At the moment, the medal is not offered for sale. There are ongoing investigations into the question of ownership. Under these circumstances, we are unlikely to put the medal up for sale," said Nimord Dix, managing director of the Dix Noonan Webb, Britain's leading dealer in coins and medals.

The medal was awarded posthumously to Naik Kirpa Ram of the Frontier Force Rifles in 1946 for sacrificing his life in order to save his army comrades from harm.

But dispute arose over the ownership of the medal, Britain's highest civilian gallantry decoration after Kirpa Ram's widow Brahmi Devi claimed it was stolen from her house in Bharpal Village in Himachal Pradesh in 2002. However, the auctioner asserted they have affidavits to prove that she was handing it over to one Kapil Singh "with my sweet will" in April 2000.

In another affidavit, Singh said he received the medal from Brahmi Devi as a gift for "services I have provided for the past years" and he in turn was handing it over to SL Jain, whom Dix identified as a Delhi-based dealer.

The medal is expected to fetch 20,000 pounds.

 

[AliFarooq]

Singh should be ashamed of himself, selling an highly honorable artifact.
But after all people sell them selves for money, a medal should not be a big deal.

 

[third eye]

Shimla, Dec 2 (IANS) She is now fighting a different battle, a battle to get the gallantry medal awarded to her husband posthumously back to India. Brahmi Devi, 77, the widow of a pre-independence Indian soldier, is happy with the announcement that the auction of the George Cross medal in London has been put off. Her husband, Naik Kirpa Ram was awarded the medal for sacrificing his life to save his army comrades from harm while disposing of a misfired rifle grenade at a camp in Bangalore Sep 12, 1945. She received the medal from the Viceroy of India, Field Marshal Lord Wavell, in 1946. 'I have won half the battle (to get the auction of the medal stalled). But the battle is still on. My soul will not rest till I get the medal back,' Brahmi Devi told IANS here Wednesday. She was here to meet the chief minister and the police officials regarding the auction of the medal by Dix Noonan Webb, leading specialist auctioneers and valuers of coins and medals in London. 'It's totally a baseless allegation that I have sold the medal to somebody. Do you think that any Indian woman could part with the medal that is the last remembrance of her husband? At least, this is not possible for a woman who lives in a small village and still believes in orthodox views,' said an emotionally charged Brahmi Devi, who was widowed when she was just 13. 'You see I had kept the medal for 56 years as a memorabilia. In all these years, whenever I used to travel out of my village I used to bury it deep in the ground.' 'The loss of the medal is as bad as the loss of my husband. My husband will not pardon me if I sell off the medal. Is this the way society treats their heroes who sacrificed their lives for others?' 'I don't know anybody by the name Kirpal Singh (who claims to have an affidavit which says that the medal was gifted to him by Brahmi Devi). I have never met him. I have never gifted nor sold the medal. I only know that the medal was stolen from my house,' she said. The medal was allegedly stolen from Brahmi Devi's house in a small village in Bilaspur district in 2002. She had reported the theft of the medal Feb 3, 2002. However, the police had closed the case after a few years as the medal could not be traced. Regarding the sympathies expressed by the UK-based current owner of the medal, Ashok Nath, for Brahmi Devi, she said: 'I think he will certainly return my last remembrance.' Nath wrote to the Himachal Pradesh Police Tuesday that he had withdrawn the medal from the auction on his own. Favouring a thorough probe into the medal controversy, Nath wrote that he had acquired the medal in good faith nine years ago from S.L. Jain, who was a reputed coin and medal dealer, after being shown two affidavits along with a video which convinced him that the medals had been acquired in a proper manner. He sympathised with Brahmi Devi by saying that 'he would be the first person to return the medal to her if it was found that it was stolen. Being a victim of circumstances Brahmi Devi would still have his sympathy even if she had indeed given the medal to Kirpal Singh.' Brahmi Devi's voice choked when she said: 'Now I am pinning my hopes that Nath would return my medal. If this happens, my soul will rest in peace.'

 

[Spring Onion]

Singh should be ashamed of himself, selling an highly honorable artifact.
But after all people sell them selves for money, a medal should not be a big deal.

I think there is more to it. If i am not wrong the wife of the owner of the medal has claimed it was stolen.

This man Singh must be lying. If the medal is sold the money should be handed over to Brahmi Devi,