What's new

Genetic proof that Pakistanis are different from Indians

The entire structure of Urdu is taken from Hindi that's why its also called Hindustani. Its only garnished with some arabic and persian vocabulary to make it look different from its Hindi origin. Something that you cant replace with arabic and persian words, its exactly the same as in hindi. BTW thanks for promoting Hindustani. It has given our hindi film industry a market of 200 million people.
BULLSHIT.

Urdu is not from Hindi you ignorant person.

Urdu was the language of the Mughals.

We Urdu speakers have nothing to do with you Hindi speakers.

Stay away from us you "Indians."
 
.
BULLSHIT.

Urdu is not from Hindi you ignorant person.

Urdu was the language of the Mughals.

We Urdu speakers have nothing to do with you Hindi speakers.

Stay away from us you "Indians."
Its reflecting very obviously that you have lost the argument. The debate ends.
 
. .
The entire structure of Urdu is taken from Hindi that's why its also called Hindustani. Its only garnished with some arabic and persian vocabulary to make it look different from its Hindi origin. Something that you cant replace with arabic and persian words, its exactly the same as in hindi. BTW thanks for promoting Hindustani. It has given our hindi film industry a market of 200 million people.

Its reflecting very obviously that you have lost the argument. The debate ends.

Amazing to see this type of ignorant revisionism take place. Urdu is much older than Hindi. Once again, you manage to confuse yourself with semantics to make ridiculous claims stemming from complete insecurity.

In the late 19th century, a movement to develop Hindi as a standardised form of Hindustani separate from Urdu took form. In 1881, Bihar accepted Hindi as its sole official language, replacing Urdu, and thus became the first state of India to adopt Hindi.
It was all Urdu before that point, whatever you want to call it. The Mughals called it Urdu for starters.

Some more interesting facts from Google:

Before the rise of what we now see as a standardized and sanskritized Hindi, Standard Urdu, was the official language of the British, and Muslim courts. In fact, when Standard Hindi first became an official language, it was replacing Standard Urdu in Bihar. Standard Hindi didn’t much so evolve, but was spontaneously created, specifically in regards to Hindu nationalists, who wanted to see a language that had a more Sanskrit influence, and was written in Devanagari


It would appear that you have the British raj to thank for a lot of things. The Brits practically created the Indian identity as we know it today.
 
Last edited:
. .
Then why hindustani (aka urdu) is your national language and not dari or pashto? Why your army chief shares his surname with Indian hindu/sikhs?
Urdu was needed as a unifying language, despite 70 years passing, only 8% of Pakistanis speak Urdu as their first language. Bajwa is a Jat clan, The Jat tribe that makes up less than 2% of India but over 15% of Pakistan.
 
.
Urdu was needed as a unifying language, despite 70 years passing, only 8% of Pakistanis speak Urdu as their first language. Bajwa is a Jat clan, The Jat tribe that makes up less than 2% of India but over 15% of Pakistan.
Everyone in Pakistan can speak Urdu
 
. .
Pakistanis have nothing to do with India.

Its only Indians dream that we have anything to do with them.

We were literally the same 70 years ago. 70 years won't change the genetic mix up that occurred for over 700 years. Even if we were genetically similar to Indians whats the big deal ? We have a seperate identity now.
 
. .
main-qimg-ac63b28bd9885479d0eca27d54afb146


map-genetic.jpg



2j2xLe7.jpg

Here is the genetic proof that Pakistanis are different from Indians.

Does red stand for south Indian?? Can you explain how the graph should be interpreted?
 
.
main-qimg-ac63b28bd9885479d0eca27d54afb146


map-genetic.jpg



2j2xLe7.jpg

Here is the genetic proof that Pakistanis are different from Indians.
Where the hell is Haryanvi???
And really??? It shows Dravidians Having more European ancestory than North Indian???
One more thing, North India Consistent of J&K, Uttrakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. Out of which, only UP is part of Gangetic Plains. Even Western UP is Dominated by People Having IVC ancestory like Gujjars, Jats Etc. J&K, Punjab and Haryana are a Part of IVC. So it will be Wrong to call Whole North India as Gangetic People.
 
.
Where the hell is Haryanvi???
And really??? It shows Dravidians Having more European ancestory than North Indian???
One more thing, North India Consistent of J&K, Uttrakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. Out of which, only UP is part of Gangetic Plains. Even Western UP is Dominated by People Having IVC ancestory like Gujjars, Jats Etc. J&K, Punjab and Haryana are a Part of IVC. So it will be Wrong to call Whole North India as Gangetic People.


You guys are gangadeshis now.
 
. .
YEAH, So you Gonna Change my Genetics???? My DNA won't change by your Trolling. If you want to answer sincerely, then You are most welcome. If not, then GTFO!!!!

It won't take long till your genes are diluted son. Aren't you guys in Haryana already importing women from gangadeshis because you kill off your females? In 2 generations you will all be bhaiyas, so get used to it.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom