This just goes to prove that once again, China is just trying to catch up but still remain behind.
Then provide reasonably credible evidence that the DF-21 is a deployable weapon.
This is why I continue to laugh and make fun of you Chinese boys. Interception of an object is theory but building the interceptor that will do it with %100 certainty is engineering. We already have a kinetic kill interceptor. We do not need to do it against the DF-21 to prove that such an interception is feasible. There is no such thing as the 'DF-21 THEORY' or 'How to intercept the DF-21' theory. If the DF-21 can maneuver that will make its interception more problematic but that does not invalidate the idea that we can intercept a descending ballistic warhead with another vehicle.
Wrong...Until you, the claimant, can provide reasonably credible evidence that the DF-21 is a fully functional weapon, you have nothing. The fact that you do not understand even basic logic undermine your entire blind support of the Chinese.Nope, it only proved that China was the first to create an ASBM and America is left behind playing catch up!
Every material absorb heat, even a mirror, so if the laser's heat is enough, it will shatter the mirror defense. Plus, the mirror is for visible wavelength, this laser weapon need not be in the visible spectrum, so if you want to have a reflective surface robust enough to absorb heat while reflect some non-visible laser beam, you will not have anything like a ballistic warhead to start, or your ballistic missile will be so large to carry this extremely robust warhead that it will bankrupt your economy.
New Recruit
google translation:
DIRCM (Directed Infrared Counter Measures) is a protection system for
military and civil aircraft against approaching
Guided missiles with infrared seekers. The system uses a
Missile Warner together and consists of the IR-liability
Tracker, Laser precision tracker and destructive of the IR detector
hide approaching missile with high-energy pulses or destroyed.
The entire process takes place in a very short time and at a safe distance
from the protected object. With two or three DIRCM systems
entire airspace around an aircraft to be protected. After
successful completion of the demonstrator program and the risk-
Minimization studies in 2006, 2009, the project
(Development) of the operational system in cooperation with EADS
and start Diehl BGT Defence. From 2014 on the first serial
DIRCM systems will be provided for the german A400M fleet.
Another fail. By the way you talk, may be the 'cold fusion' guy was correct, that even though they failed to replicate his 'result', they still had to prove his 'result' was flawed. That is not how it works, kid. The first responsibility to prove anything lies with the claimant. The default position is ALWAYS doubt, from when the Earth was proclaimed to be round to cold fusion.Any object.
Essentially, yes. Theories do not take into consideration factors like manufacturing and materials defects, or human caused events like someone wrongly calibrated a piece of equipment. You argue this way tells me you have never worked in an R/D or manufacturing environment.
Whatever canceled can be resurrected.
Your persistence in bringing up decoys or descent speed tells me these subjects totally escaped you.
The fact that the PAC 3 had successful intercepts means the theory is proven. The laser will complement the kinetic kill interceptors.
You mean you got busted for being wrong. What a lame recovery attempt.
Same can be said about your blind support for America.
Anyways the F-22 too was said to be proven, but have we actually seen the thing in a combat environment? It doesn't stop the American government from procuring it did it? let alone this speed boat hitting laser and you are giving so much credit for.
I am not saying it is wrong to consult science fiction for inspiration, but it is equally important to knuckle down and be in the realm of reality.
Aviation is proven. The F-22 or the 747 or the Wright Flyer are devices that proved the many theories that made up 'aviation' or 'heavier than air powered flight'. The F-22's deployment is not the same thing as being in combat and this is where you are wrong, again. As for this laser weapon, there is nothing that 'need' to be 'proven', only the engineering hurdles that must be overcome as the greater the dynamics of the objects involved, the greater the complexities of those engineering hurdles.
I guess reading the discussion so far before shooting off one's mouth is too difficult for a 12yr old to perform...what if the approaching speed boats have large mirrors attached to them and the laser gets reflected back??with expensive innovation comes cheap counter innovation
I guess reading the discussion so far before shooting off one's mouth is too difficult for a 12yr old to perform...
what if the approaching speed boats have large mirrors attached to them and the laser gets reflected back??with expensive innovation comes cheap counter innovation
