Mirza Jatt
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2010
- Messages
- 5,701
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Are you guys still there where you went last time?
You means North Doklam (the disputed place)?
No India is not there and never was there. (Its Bhutanese territory).
Chinese came there for construction of road, then India comes and stops them. India goes back, Chinese go back.
India is back to its own territory..while Chinese is constructing 'Near' that areas. But no one is on that disputed place.
I am not sure you understood what you just stated, WHO LEFT? HOW CAN WE LEAVE WHEN WE ARE STILL IN DOKLAM? It's physics bhai, common sense.
Excuses after excuses, my smileys is less than a line and you deserved to be laughed upon due to your indiocy. I did not copy, I repeated it, check the structure of the sentence, it's different. You did not even attempt to understand the reality on the ground. Typical Indian, but you seems to be a Jatt Sikh? Why bother being ganga hindu cannon fodder? Get your own country, fight for it. Don't be a slave to the Hindus.
If you have a defence treaty with Bhutan, then why the heck are you not defending them? You see, there's a difference between having a treaty and enforcing a treaty. We are occupying a disputed territory, the worst part is this is the exact piece of territory which strategically threatens India. You were so desperate to get out of the situation even to the point of proposing Bhutanese soldiers swap places with India to face the stand off by themselves. Basically, you over boasted and tried to run and in the end you did run and we occupied Doklam Plateau.
Syama,
Really? That map is wrong and had been highlighted by even the Indian media. There is no trijunction there GENIUS.
Aat first you say there is no Chinese occupation, then when we occupied that plateau, now you change the geographic location of the conflict. Damn, you Indians can come out with so many excuses.
I don't even read your posts now. I see you quote me and I keep you engaged. and I like doing it.
In that case, it is very simple, show evidence of Bhutan crying for help to India and when.
Re-enactment and acting like what is done with Surgical Strike on HistoryTV18 is not acceptable.
India must be Supa efficient as they acted 10 days before Bhutan protested, most probably under duress by India to belatedly cover up India's illegal blatant act of aggression.
Interesting that nowhere in Bhutan's demarche to China mentioned India or that Bhutan had called for India's help.
Sorry, keep lying don't make it a truth.
We are not like your deluded Indian ministers who are easily taken in by lies.
Remember that lie, 36% NASA scientists are Indians ?
Pathetic nation.
.
See this ii what I wrote to you. I have just bolded the parts again to let you understand why I was not willing to write and also why Bhutan does not need to cry for help. But again.. as they say you can wake up a sleeping man bug you cant wake up a man acting to be sleeping. Live in your self logic making the picture rosy for yourself. we are hardly susrpirised when things don't add up to your picture you start calling it a lie.
I wish this post was written by someone who'd understand what I am typing now. nevertheless, I will give it a try. India and Bhutan has a defence treaty. Bhutan is a protectorate state of India. That allows/ enables India to interfere on behalf of Bhutan whenever there is a dispute raised by Bhutan. Any dispute raised by Bhutan and the situation warranting the safety of Bhutan and its assets, qualifies for India's interference. Same happened in Doklam...Bhutanese army confronted the Chinese first and the situation scaled into a level threatening Bhutan's land assets... and then India comes into picture because of the treaty. That's how protectorates are protected. Bhutan does not need to cry for help on Facebook to let the world know that it called for help.
.