What's new

Former extremist now fights militancy in Pakistan

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
By SEBASTIAN ABBOT and CHRIS BRUMMITT, Associated Press


FILE - In this March 3, 2006, file photo, British Muslim Maajid Nawaz listens during a news conference in a London hotel. Nawaz and two other British Muslims, had just been released nearly four years after their arrest in Egypt. The three men had been in Egyptian custody since their April 2002 arrest on charges of membership in the Islamic fundamentalist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, or the Liberation Party, which the Egyptian government banned in 1974. Ten years ago, Nawaz came to Pakistan to recruit for an extremist group. Now he's on a different mission - to steer youth away from militancy.
(AP Photo/Matt Dunham,file)


ISLAMABAD – Ten years ago, Maajid Nawaz came to Pakistan to recruit for an extremist group intent on a global Islamic state. Now he's on a different mission — to steer youth away from militancy.

Nawaz's message is one rarely heard in Pakistan, where the response to extremism has been overwhelmingly military, with little attempt to try to rehabilitate insurgents or keep young people from turning to militancy in the first place.

In speeches to thousands of university students across the country, Nawaz emphasized the urgent need to renounce radicalism.

"We must reclaim Islam," the British citizen of Pakistani descent told some 100 students on a campus close to the capital last month. "We must reclaim Pakistan."

While Pakistan has poured troops and weaponry into its fight against the Taliban and other extremist groups, it has adopted few of the softer measures aimed at dissuading militancy. And critics say that is a major weakness in Pakistan's strategy against terrorism.

"There is no country where such a program is more important than in Pakistan," said Rohan Gunaratna, a terrorism expert who chaired the first international conference on militant rehabilitation in Singapore in February.

"In parallel with the kinetic fight to catch and kill terrorists, there needs to be a parallel policy to fight the ideology."

There are signs Pakistan is considering such a program. Senior officials recently went to Saudi Arabia to study the effort there, considered the world's most comprehensive. Egypt pioneered the idea of militant rehabilitation in the 1990s, and Yemen, Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia have also followed suit.

The programs involve counseling by moderate clerics and former extremists. Militants who renounce their old ways can receive financial support or help finding a job. Parallel programs in schools and mosques are aimed at young people.

A former Guantanamo Bay detainee, Saad Iqbal Madni, said he would welcome such a program in Pakistan.

"If I had a little support, I could tell them that killing innocent people is not from Islam," said Madni, who was freed last year. Madni, who was never charged, denied engaging in violence, but said he would have credibility with fellow Pakistanis.

The results from such soft tactics have varied, said Christopher Boucek, who recently published a report on the Saudi program for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Indonesia has persuaded prominent terrorists to disavow violence and counsel others to do the same. But 23 of 117 Saudis who returned from Guantanamo and passed through the Saudi system have been re-arrested or are on the government's most-wanted terrorist list, said Boucek.

Shazadi Beg, a London-based human rights lawyer who has studied the need for such programs in Pakistan, said they are important because most militant recruits are young men with a limited understanding of Islam and no other way to earn a living.

A further complication is that for years the Pakistani government actively sponsored extremists to use as proxies in Afghanistan and Kashmir, a territory claimed by both Pakistan and India.

"In Saudi, you're dealing with relatively small groups, but in Pakistan the jails are full with these sorts of detainees," said Mohammed Amir Rana, a terrorism expert at the Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies. "The problem is the number of people the government wants to be rehabilitated."

Most of Pakistan's 180 million people follow a moderate form of Islam influenced by local traditions, but hard-liners have made significant inroads since the 1980s. Anger at the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan and support for a succession of Pakistani leaders seen as corrupt and illegitimate have swelled their ranks.

Another problem, said Pakistani lawmaker Mushahid Hussain, is that Pakistan is late to realize how serious a threat Islamic militants pose. Bureaucratic inertia is strong, he says, along with an aversion to new ideas and a state of denial.

"Unless (the programs) start, we don't know how successful they will be," Hussain said. "It is not a battle of bombs and bullets. It is a battle of ideas."

Nazar, the extremist turned inspirational speaker, used to belong to Hizb ut-Tahrir, which claims to have hundreds of thousands of members around the world working on establishing an Islamic caliphate. The group pledges nonviolence, but Nawaz alleges that in some countries — including nuclear-armed Pakistan — a key strategy was to foment a military coup.

Pakistan has formally banned the group, as have several other Muslim countries, but authorities are not really enforcing the ban. Its members take part in demonstrations, hold public meetings and hand out leaflets largely unobstructed.

In 1999, Hizb ut-Tahrir paid for Nawaz to go to Pakistan, ostensibly as a student, to recruit members. He traveled all over the country doing so.

Later, he went to Egypt, where he was imprisoned for four years for recruiting for the group. He met other radicals, studied Islamic texts in jail and gradually changed his opinions, he said. He now believes that Islam calls for the separation of the faith and politics.

Imran Yousafzai, deputy spokesman of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Pakistan, said he was aware of Nawaz's activities in Pakistan.

"I heard he was once an active member in Pakistan," he said. "I am sad to say that he is now working against Islam."

During his recent appearances on college campuses, some students questioned why Nawaz was "attacking" Islam and not U.S. foreign policy in Pakistan and Afghanistan. One hard-liner, whom Nawaz accuses of being a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir, punched him in the face after a talk in the eastern city of Lahore.

Nawaz said he hopes to start a network of moderate Pakistani Muslims to speak out against extremism. He gets a salary as director of the Quilliam Foundation, a mainstream think tank that challenges extremism and promotes pluralism, and is partly funded by the British government.

Pervez Hoodbhoy, a university lecturer and vocal critic of militant Islam, said students responded positively to Nawaz but that he did not expect to see "any movement building up behind him."

"It is a great job he is doing and it's important that people hear him, he said. "But it wasn't a life-changing experience."
 
.
Many people don't know that there are several Hadiths against Extremism in islam.

Islam = religion of peace and tollerance.

But you can't blame simply the militants, you must go to the root cause of the problem! who created these militants? and why?

The answer is quite simple, U.S.A used Pakistan to fight against Soviet Union. so these Americans can't just wash their hands simply blaming Pakistan or Islam....they know the truth.:agree:
 
.
Many people don't know that there are several Hadiths against Extremism in islam.

Islam = religion of peace and tollerance.

But you can't blame simply the militants, you must go to the root cause of the problem! who created these militants? and why?

The answer is quite simple, U.S.A used Pakistan to fight against Soviet Union. so these Americans can't just wash their hands simply blaming Pakistan or Islam....they know the truth.:agree:

But if you are true followers and upkeepers of Islam why did you allow a morally corrupt country like USA use you ?

Regards
 
.
But if you are true followers and upkeepers of Islam why did you allow a morally corrupt country like USA use you ?

Regards

Infect i never support the fake jihad imposed upon poor pakistani (many times illitrate people) and if you read my post i don't blame only U.S.A, i just mention that the americans can't simply wash their hands because fundamently it's because of them that we are facing these terrorists now days, after the war ended, they didn't take care of all those jihadis which came in Afghanistan to fight against evil soviets. Afte several years of fighting these jihadis lost their aim in life, they lost their identities, lost their will. nobody rehabilitate them.

I seriously critisize Gen. Zia a U.S. puppet, his american policy ruined Pakistan. If you go and read about the Pakistan during 1974-1977 it was a completly diffrent Pakistan with the PIL growing at 21% far away bigger then that of China today!

Obviously it's our fault too...actually our leaders fault (imposed upon us by U.S.) but you can't blame simply Pakistan for everything, it's just unfair.:frown:

A true Muslims first read the Islamic books, Quran and then hear what other says about Islam and finds on it's own the true path.

No where in any Islamic book you can read that killing innocent (Muslims or Non-Muslims) people means jihad.

These terrorist have a completly diffrent ideology and are working for forces which wants to take controll of this important region but remind it even the Nato/U.S. will never win in Afghanistan, it's impossible (for our bad luck).:disagree:
 
.
But if you are true followers and upkeepers of Islam why did you allow a morally corrupt country like USA use you ?

Regards

That's quite a statement isn't it?
Shame on sergente rehan for letting the U.S. make use of him and for joining in their WoT.

C'mon, you can't be blaming individuals for this, you know how the majority of Pakistanis think about the U.S. and their involvement in and with our government.
 
.
That's quite a statement isn't it?
C'mon, you can't be blaming individuals for this, you know how the majority of Pakistanis think about the U.S. and their involvement in and with our government.

Bro i know very well about it. you miss understood my post. I'm not blaming the people of Pakistan but only some of our corrupt politicians (like Zardari) and U.S. for involving us in this (fake) WoT. i know that some internal and external forces (Mossad, Raw, CIA) are trying to destabilize Pakistan and many times among these militants there are also Non-Muslims which with their fake predictions about Islam are using some (ignorant) people (mosltly Afghani).

But the word jihad is being miss used in these past years and now days we are facing all these problems. There isn't any Jihad against a Muslim state, against Muslims!! people must realize this.
 
.
I seriously critisize Gen. Zia a U.S. puppet, his american policy ruined Pakistan. If you go and read about the Pakistan during 1974-1977 it was a completly diffrent Pakistan with the PIL growing at 21% far away bigger then that of China today!

seriously just to let you know, if pakistan did not support that war against USSR pakistan would have been next target. after all USSR was here in that region for stratigic uphold meaning access to arabian sea.. PAK did not have any nukes and it would not have been hard for USSR to crush pakistan along with india.
 
.
seriously just to let you know, if pakistan did not support that war against USSR pakistan would have been next target. after all USSR was here in that region for stratigic uphold meaning access to arabian sea.. PAK did not have any nukes and it would not have been hard for USSR to crush pakistan along with india.

It was enough for us to have good relations with Russians! what did you get from U.S. in the reward of winning this war in Afghanistan putting the end to the era of cold war?! Atleast Bhutto tried to have some good relations with Russians and they give us Steel Mill, did you ever think U.S. will ever do anything that could benefit Pakistan in long terms or make Pakistan stronger?:what:
 
.
what did you get from U.S. in the reward of winning this war in Afghanistan putting the end to the era of cold war?!


Reflects the mentality of a servant --


Pakistan was involved against the communist in Afghanistan before the U.S and it was the U.S that joined Pakistan in this effort, please get your facts straight and please do not suggest that Pakistan acted based on your servant or mercenary attitude.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom