Former DG-ISI, General Durrani owns BBC interview

[Abu Zolfiqar]

so where's the video..

 

[ice_man]

Its really sad that after retirement most army officers go for cheap tactics for publicity. Anyhow his opinon is his opinon and not the policy of the armed forces as of now.

So yes he can have an opinon but cannot be takes as a fact set in stone.

 

[13 komaun]

WoW now a former DG- ISI is saying .....


Pakistani state support Terrorism what a shame........

 

[ice_man]

--
even we accept that...
1. do all afgani bulid that high wall house inside military garrison ?
2. do you want to say... pak est did not know who stays in 1K distance from its military academy ?
3. do you want to say.. that guy roam aorund pak..(read in book ) but auhorities dont know which vehicle come and go near acadment and incinsde garrisoan are a?
4.abottabd is just 110 km from islambad and gop dont know who is there ?

3 Planes were hijacked in USA. 2 hit the twin towers one hit the pentagon. THE CIA didn't know?

the pilots of these planes were trained in USA the CIA didn't know?

 

[pursuit of happiness]

3 Planes were hijacked in USA. 2 hit the twin towers one hit the pentagon. THE CIA didn't know?

the pilots of these planes were trained in USA the CIA didn't know?

--

 

[Jazzbot]

Video, or it didn't happen.

 

[tarrar]

Do share the video here. Many bharatis on this forum have already wet their chaddis over it.

I can't stop laughing.

 

[notorious_eagle]

I'd love to engage in a constructive debate.

But how can you start a debate on the premise that OBL slunk into Pak, lived with wifes & children and no one knew while an ex intel chief admits that those who mattered knew.

No disrespect meant but POV need to be cogent.

You have to expand, what possible benefit would Pakistan derive by hosting Bin Laden? Let me remind you, it is because of this man thousands of Pakistanis have died and he was instrumental in bringing instability into Pakistan. What possible benefit would the Agencies in Pakistan derive by hosting this man?

Besides, former US Secretary of State has stated on record that there is no evidence that Pakistani Agencies were aware of OBL's presence. This statement is as authentic as it gets as it is stated by the top US Diplomat. Besides, your entire premise is based upon the testimony of a man who retired as the DG ISI in the early 90's. Once you hang your boots, your out, have no access to any briefings. Durrani is giving his opinion, not stating a fact. Thus, your entire argument is a complete farce backed up by no logic or evidence.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

WoW now a former DG- ISI is saying .....


Pakistani state support Terrorism what a shame........

did you actually read the article or as usual hindustanis like you jump and get over-enthusiastic just when you see headlines without even reading? and when it comes to state terrorism and all - well that dot-headed prime minister of yours is a terrorist and i cant recall the last time a country elected one to actually lead a country

 

[Norwegian]

so where's the video..

Its already online, seriously use google:
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/worldservice/ht/ht_20150211-0500a.mp3

@Horus @TankMan

 

[13 komaun]

did you actually read the article or as usual hindustanis like you jump and get over-enthusiastic just when you see headlines without even reading? and when it comes to state terrorism and all - well that dot-headed prime minister of yours is a terrorist and i cant recall the last time a country elected one to actually lead a country

I am not saying......


Pentagon: Pakistan Uses ‘Proxy Forces’ in India and Afghanistan | The Diplomat

 

[TankMan]

Its already online, seriously use google:
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/worldservice/ht/ht_20150211-0500a.mp3

@Horus @TankMan

You beat me to it - it wasn't there before. Still, the video is up now:

Bhai, that 'stupid protection' is called copyright protection. Please play carefully. Its a matter of minutes to track down your ware-abouts.

Its more about the software than the copyright, as it is already being distributed and viewable on the BBC website and that is where I got it from. So technically, I never violated the copyright. I am 'playing carefully', but appreciate the concern. I did, however, edit my post, as it certainly gave the wrong impression the way it was.

so where's the video..

Here:

 

[Norwegian]

You beat me to it - it wasn't there before. Still, the video is up now:

Thanks but you exposed your real name over there Mr. Asghar

 

[TankMan]

Thanks but you exposed your real name over there Mr. Asghar

That's not my real name Mr. Norwegian

 

[Norwegian]

That's not my real name Mr. Norwegian

But you admitted yourself that you were the uploader?