What's new

Forget the F-22 or F-35: Here Are 3 Exotic Stealth Fighters You've Never Heard Of

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
A709%20%281%29.jpg

Forget the F-22 or F-35: Here Are 3 Exotic Stealth Fighters You've Never Heard Of


The next generation?

by Caleb Larson
The F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lighting II have stolen the spotlight in the world of aviation. So here are three stealth fighters under development that you may have never heard of.


Generic Future Fighter


Engineers at Saab are already beginning work on Sweden’s newest fighter, which will be designed from the get-go as a stealth fighter.

Working with Linköping University in Sweden, Saab created a sub-scale model of what they envision as their Generic Future Fighter. Though the demonstrator airframe was only a 13 percent scale model, it reportedly is able to fly and gave researchers some insights into stealth fighter development.

In keeping with Saab’s delta wing heritage, the Generic Future Fighter model has a modified delta wing and smaller canards just below and rear of the cockpit. It has an F-22 style bubble canopy with a chine running the length of the nose. Also, like the F-22 Raptor, the Generic Future Fighter uses a canted tail design.

The small size of the demonstrator served to quickly and cheaply gather real-world flight data. The demonstrator reportedly performed as expected.

KAI KF-X

The KAI KF-X is a joint South Korean-Indonesian stealth fighter project. The project was conceptualized as far back as 2001, but was initially dismissed as too technologically challenging for South Korea’s domestic aircraft manufacturing sector, and too expensive.

The project was reassessed in 2010 and a joint partnership was Indonesia was created to help offset some of the research and development costs. Indonesia holds a 20 percent stake in the project and has committed to buying approximately 50 of the airframes once they enter production.


The KAI KF-X superficially appears similar to the F-35 stealth fighter, though its capabilities are likely much less stealthy. It too has a canted tail and a nose chine, although the overall airframe appears to be more compact than the F-35. It is intended to be stealthier than the Eurofighter Typhoon and Dassault Rafale, and have more capabilities than the F-16 with greater range and service life.

Project AZM


In tandem with China, Pakistan is reportedly developing a 5th generation stealth fighter. Like Pakistan’s previous venture with China, the JF-17, the AZM will likely be largely dependent on Chinese technology and assistance, though the final airframes may be assembled in Pakistan.

China’s FC-31 stealth fighter may be a starting place for the Project AZM idea. It is lightweight, compact, and presumably on the cheaper (and less capable) side when compared to China’s Chengdu J-20.


A home-grown stealth fighter would be a prestige win for Pakistan, though the likely focus on cost-reduction raises questions about the airframe’s final capabilities. Still, developing a stealth fighter would be an impressive feat for a country with a defense budget under $8 billion.

Proliferating Capabilities


The proliferation of stealth technologies is the next frontier of weapon control regimes and may well rule the twenty-first-century.

Caleb Larson holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy. He lives in Berlin and writes on U.S. and Russian foreign and defense policy, German politics, and culture.


Image: Reuters
 
. .
I have a question, Why Europeans are obsessed with delta wings and why USA doesn`t use that? whats the pros and cons of the two types?
 
.
A709%20%281%29.jpg

Forget the F-22 or F-35: Here Are 3 Exotic Stealth Fighters You've Never Heard Of


The next generation?

by Caleb Larson
The F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lighting II have stolen the spotlight in the world of aviation. So here are three stealth fighters under development that you may have never heard of.


Generic Future Fighter


Engineers at Saab are already beginning work on Sweden’s newest fighter, which will be designed from the get-go as a stealth fighter.

Working with Linköping University in Sweden, Saab created a sub-scale model of what they envision as their Generic Future Fighter. Though the demonstrator airframe was only a 13 percent scale model, it reportedly is able to fly and gave researchers some insights into stealth fighter development.

In keeping with Saab’s delta wing heritage, the Generic Future Fighter model has a modified delta wing and smaller canards just below and rear of the cockpit. It has an F-22 style bubble canopy with a chine running the length of the nose. Also, like the F-22 Raptor, the Generic Future Fighter uses a canted tail design.

The small size of the demonstrator served to quickly and cheaply gather real-world flight data. The demonstrator reportedly performed as expected.

KAI KF-X

The KAI KF-X is a joint South Korean-Indonesian stealth fighter project. The project was conceptualized as far back as 2001, but was initially dismissed as too technologically challenging for South Korea’s domestic aircraft manufacturing sector, and too expensive.

The project was reassessed in 2010 and a joint partnership was Indonesia was created to help offset some of the research and development costs. Indonesia holds a 20 percent stake in the project and has committed to buying approximately 50 of the airframes once they enter production.


The KAI KF-X superficially appears similar to the F-35 stealth fighter, though its capabilities are likely much less stealthy. It too has a canted tail and a nose chine, although the overall airframe appears to be more compact than the F-35. It is intended to be stealthier than the Eurofighter Typhoon and Dassault Rafale, and have more capabilities than the F-16 with greater range and service life.

Project AZM


In tandem with China, Pakistan is reportedly developing a 5th generation stealth fighter. Like Pakistan’s previous venture with China, the JF-17, the AZM will likely be largely dependent on Chinese technology and assistance, though the final airframes may be assembled in Pakistan.

China’s FC-31 stealth fighter may be a starting place for the Project AZM idea. It is lightweight, compact, and presumably on the cheaper (and less capable) side when compared to China’s Chengdu J-20.


A home-grown stealth fighter would be a prestige win for Pakistan, though the likely focus on cost-reduction raises questions about the airframe’s final capabilities. Still, developing a stealth fighter would be an impressive feat for a country with a defense budget under $8 billion.

Proliferating Capabilities


The proliferation of stealth technologies is the next frontier of weapon control regimes and may well rule the twenty-first-century.

Caleb Larson holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy. He lives in Berlin and writes on U.S. and Russian foreign and defense policy, German politics, and culture.


Image: Reuters
What's interesting is on DCS game everyone and their mother in law wants to pilot the jf17 and fly it against mirage 2000 su35 f16 etc and it's really cool. What I don NOT see is the Tejas. Additionally I do not believe that india will be successful in its endeavours to produce another fighter aircraft as Tejas has been nothing but a total failure. I am 100 certain no indian pilot wants to fly this in combat.
 
.
A709%20%281%29.jpg

Forget the F-22 or F-35: Here Are 3 Exotic Stealth Fighters You've Never Heard Of


The next generation?

by Caleb Larson
The F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lighting II have stolen the spotlight in the world of aviation. So here are three stealth fighters under development that you may have never heard of.


Generic Future Fighter


Engineers at Saab are already beginning work on Sweden’s newest fighter, which will be designed from the get-go as a stealth fighter.

Working with Linköping University in Sweden, Saab created a sub-scale model of what they envision as their Generic Future Fighter. Though the demonstrator airframe was only a 13 percent scale model, it reportedly is able to fly and gave researchers some insights into stealth fighter development.

In keeping with Saab’s delta wing heritage, the Generic Future Fighter model has a modified delta wing and smaller canards just below and rear of the cockpit. It has an F-22 style bubble canopy with a chine running the length of the nose. Also, like the F-22 Raptor, the Generic Future Fighter uses a canted tail design.

The small size of the demonstrator served to quickly and cheaply gather real-world flight data. The demonstrator reportedly performed as expected.

KAI KF-X

The KAI KF-X is a joint South Korean-Indonesian stealth fighter project. The project was conceptualized as far back as 2001, but was initially dismissed as too technologically challenging for South Korea’s domestic aircraft manufacturing sector, and too expensive.

The project was reassessed in 2010 and a joint partnership was Indonesia was created to help offset some of the research and development costs. Indonesia holds a 20 percent stake in the project and has committed to buying approximately 50 of the airframes once they enter production.


The KAI KF-X superficially appears similar to the F-35 stealth fighter, though its capabilities are likely much less stealthy. It too has a canted tail and a nose chine, although the overall airframe appears to be more compact than the F-35. It is intended to be stealthier than the Eurofighter Typhoon and Dassault Rafale, and have more capabilities than the F-16 with greater range and service life.

Project AZM


In tandem with China, Pakistan is reportedly developing a 5th generation stealth fighter. Like Pakistan’s previous venture with China, the JF-17, the AZM will likely be largely dependent on Chinese technology and assistance, though the final airframes may be assembled in Pakistan.

China’s FC-31 stealth fighter may be a starting place for the Project AZM idea. It is lightweight, compact, and presumably on the cheaper (and less capable) side when compared to China’s Chengdu J-20.


A home-grown stealth fighter would be a prestige win for Pakistan, though the likely focus on cost-reduction raises questions about the airframe’s final capabilities. Still, developing a stealth fighter would be an impressive feat for a country with a defense budget under $8 billion.

Proliferating Capabilities


The proliferation of stealth technologies is the next frontier of weapon control regimes and may well rule the twenty-first-century.

Caleb Larson holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy. He lives in Berlin and writes on U.S. and Russian foreign and defense policy, German politics, and culture.


Image: Reuters
Actually I've heard of these fighters. So do most of the members.
 
.
Actually I've heard of these fighters. So do most of the members.

Fan boys are all well inform. The article is intended for general public.

I have a question, Why Europeans are obsessed with delta wings and why USA doesn`t use that? whats the pros and cons of the two types?

Usually aircraft designers design aircraft using previous mature and proven design as the basis. So IMO it has influence from the success of the Mirage. As the designers who got experience with Mirage design are mostly European engineers who are later likely employed by some European aerospace companies, so it is understandable that some European new fighters are also using delta design, while US designers dont have such design experience.
 
Last edited:
.
I have a question, Why Europeans are obsessed with delta wings and why USA doesn`t use that? whats the pros and cons of the two types?
Pro:Not just delta, but also canard. Canard with Delta wings can get better lift and maneuverability, better supersonic performance.
Con: Harder to design, due to canard as well, the air current calculation is complex as well.

US: stick to what they are familiar with, although US has invested huge R&D on canard as well.
 
. . .
Pro:Not just delta, but also canard. Canard with Delta wings can get better lift and maneuverability, better supersonic performance.
Con: Harder to design, due to canard as well, the air current calculation is complex as well.

US: stick to what they are familiar with, although US has invested huge R&D on canard as well.
read somewhere that canards means greater rcs, don`t know if its correct?
 
. .
Last edited:
.
Fan boys are all well inform. The article is intended for general public.



Usually aircraft designers design aircraft using previous mature and proven design as the basis. So IMO it has influence from the success of the Mirage. As the designers who got experience with Mirage design are mostly European engineers who are later likely employed by some European aerospace companies, so it is understandable that some European new fighters are also using delta design, while US designers dont have such design experience.

The specification which resulted in the Mirage III was issued in 1952.
The specification which resulted in the J-35 Draken (which was a double-delta wing) was issued in 1950, and a research vehicle, the SAAB 210 flew already in 1952.
https://sv.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_210
It does make sense to claim that SAAB based their designs on the Mirage.

The current solution with a delta-wing and a canard was pioneered by SAAB with the AJ-37 Viggen.
 
.
The specification which resulted in the Mirage III was issued in 1952.
The specification which resulted in the J-35 Draken (which was a double-delta wing) was issued in 1950, and a research vehicle, the SAAB 210 flew already in 1952.
https://sv.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_210
It does make sense to claim that SAAB based their designs on the Mirage.

The current solution with a delta-wing and a canard was pioneered by SAAB with the AJ-37 Viggen.

Thanks for the information
 
.
Back
Top Bottom