First Photos of Destroyed Leopard and Bradley’s, confirmed

[aziqbal]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1715838919512653824

Russia getting dragged on the battlefield

Honestly if this is true then it’s even worse for NATO

It means Russia has lost 50% strength or even 75% and even then Ukraine can’t take land back during so called counter offensive?

 

[MeFishToo]

Honestly if this is true then it’s even worse for NATO

It means Russia has lost 50% strength or even 75% and even then Ukraine can’t take land back during so called counter offensive?

“if its true”.. you know very well Oryx is reporting visually confirmed losses. If its 50% or 75% of russian strenght, none of us knows. But it is rather obvious that a huge amount of russian armor has been wasted in mindless head on assaults this last week.

 

[aziqbal]

“if its true”.. you know very well Oryx is reporting visually confirmed losses. If its 50% or 75% of russian strenght, none of us knows. But it is rather obvious that a huge amount of russian armor has been wasted in mindless head on assaults this last week.

And yet NATO still hasn’t reached the Sea of Azov

They said in the spring by winter the counter offensive will have cut the Russian land bridge to crimea ?

 

[MeFishToo]

And yet NATO still hasn’t reached the Sea of Azov

They said in the spring by winter the counter offensive will have cut the Russian land bridge to crimea ?

Did they? Im pretty sure no NATO forces are involved. The ukrainian objective might have been to reach the Azov sea, but they still havent. Remind us all again what the russian objective is?

 

[aziqbal]

Did they? Im pretty sure no NATO forces are involved. The ukrainian objective might have been to reach the Azov sea, but they still havent. Remind us all again what the russian objective is?

The Russian objective is to have a land bridge between Crimea and Russia

And they have that

 

[Vergennes]

Honestly if this is true then it’s even worse for NATO

It means Russia has lost 50% strength or even 75% and even then Ukraine can’t take land back during so called counter offensive?

How come Ukraine liberating its land and crippling Russian capabilities is "losing" ?

And don't tell us "Russia's objective was to create a landbridge to crimea" as Russian objectives keep changing every two weeks as their principal ones failed miserably. Meanwhile Russia's losing more equipment in two weeks in Avdiivka than Ukraine from June to october on all fronts.

Did they? Im pretty sure no NATO forces are involved. The ukrainian objective might have been to reach the Azov sea, but they still havent. Remind us all again what the russian objective is?

Russians and their bootlickers are trying to push the "NATO narrative" as it would be humiliating to admit they are losing only to Ukrainians. Had NATO been involved, those drunkards would have been defeated much way earlier.

 

[aziqbal]

How come Ukraine liberating its land and crippling Russian capabilities is "losing" ?

And don't tell us "Russia's objective was to create a landbridge to crimea" as Russian objectives keep changing every two weeks as their principal ones failed miserably. Meanwhile Russia's losing more equipment in two weeks in Avdiivka than Ukraine from June to october on all fronts.



Russians and their bootlickers are trying to push the "NATO narrative" as it would be humiliating to admit they are losing only to Ukrainians. Had NATO been involved, those drunkards would have been defeated much way earlier.

Ok Russia has lost 90% of its equipment fine

This makes it even worse for NATO

NATO can’t even beat 10% remaining Russians ?

It only gets more embarrassing

 

[MeFishToo]

The Russian objective is to have a land bridge between Crimea and Russia

And they have that

Russia initially gained that landbridge basically driving from A to B 1,5 years ago. Please stop pretending 1 year of russian failure had anything to do with that coastline.

 

[aziqbal]

Russia initially gained that landbridge basically driving from A to B 1,5 years ago. Please stop pretending 1 year of russian failure had anything to do with that coastline.

ok lets say I agree with your first point

2 years later and $150 billion why has Ukraine not taken it back ?

 

[MeFishToo]

ok lets say I agree with your first point

2 years later and $150 billion why has Ukraine not taken it back ?

First of all its 1 year later. Secondly no $150 billion were donated as weapons and security aid by the West. Meanwhile russian military budget was up 40% in 2023 and expect to surpass 10% of BNP next year - and thats the russian provided official numbers including classified expenditures (which are for defence and security), so russias war related expenses are going to be $160 billion in 2023. Why hasnt Russia moved an inch?

 

[aziqbal]

I guess Germany should ask for Merkava ?

https://x.com/arthurm40330824/status/1717418133273579862?s=46&t=y0OFodoGxInwRRrH23SIWA

 

[aziqbal]

Seems like leopard hits a Mine

x.com

x.com

 

[aziqbal]

Swedish leopard one of the best tanks in the world taken out by ATGM

https://x.com/alex_oloyede2/status/1719140840155800031?s=46&t=y0OFodoGxInwRRrH23SIWA

 

[aziqbal]

Visual conformation of 1 x Leopard + 3 x Bradley’s IFV in last 24 hours

x.com

x.com

and a drone takes out a Leopard

$5000 drone and $5 million MBT

https://x.com/kingstyler88/status/1720017031607582720?s=46&t=y0OFodoGxInwRRrH23SIWA

 

[aziqbal]

It’s been around a year since lancets appeared on the scene and started killing German leopards

Why after 1 years have they still not got APS or lancet defense ?

Either lancet iterations are adapting or Ukraine has simply given up

x.com

x.com