Fifty questions on 9/11

[MastanKhan]

Hi,

The stupidest questions some engineers ask is----the temperature didnot get to 1400 or 2000 deg for the steel to melt----


To those idiots---at that temp steel is water---the ribbed / tor steel has already lost its integrity---tensile strength at temperatures between 600---800 degrees---the bars have become malleable and ductile---.


Yes aircraft hit and evaporate---living close to hill air force base---many a times I read about F 16's crashing into the great salt lake---and bare minimum metal was found----plane totally disintegrated---and that just hitting the water---.

 

[PakShaheen79]

One plane hitting WTC can not bring it down.. It was engineered for such unfortunate accidents in future. Simple is that. And what about Pentagon?

On top of that... I have a simple question... What happened to Al-Qeda's huge network who was so efficient to beat security measures in four flights and two most sensitive US location. Why it went down so quietly after "successfully" completing a mission in heart of US. Why not a single gunshot anywhere else by AlQaeda in US after 9/11? Because there was no Al-Qaeda but there is Al-CIA'eda for sure.

 

[gambit]

One plane hitting WTC can not bring it down..

Who told you that? It was a combination of severe structural damages and fire. Why is that so difficult to understand?

It was engineered for such unfortunate accidents in future. Simple is that.

It was not that simple. The architects intended for the towers to survive a collision with an aircraft that is at take-off and landing speed, not one where the pilot pushed the throttle forward. Higher speed equal to greater kinetic energy. Did you miss that in basic physics?

And what about Pentagon?

What about the Pentagon?

On top of that... I have a simple question... What happened to Al-Qeda's huge network who was so efficient to beat security measures in four flights and two most sensitive US location. Why it went down so quietly after "successfully" completing a mission in heart of US. Why not a single gunshot anywhere else by AlQaeda in US after 9/11? Because there was no Al-Qaeda but there is Al-CIA'eda for sure.

May be you are used to living under a dictatorship for so long you do not know what an open society live like but everything the hijackers did in selecting the day and the flights YOU can do. Flight information is no state secret.

 

[gambit]

What a co-incident, btw how many york build collapse same day? to me, not other then WTCs.. Also, can you tell me how fire erupt same day, and fire proof system also failed same day.. after that the things will come like steel melt or what ever..

try google again

This line of 'logic' can be applied to an ordinary housefire. Is it a coincident that there was a water main break? Is it a coincident that the fire department was 5 miles away? Is it a coincident that blah blah blah...? You are looking for coincidences where there are none. May be you should take your own advice and use google in a more OBJECTIVE manner.

 

[paritosh]

One plane hitting WTC can not bring it down.. It was engineered for such unfortunate accidents in future. Simple is that.

it did not bring the WTC down...the tower did not budge from it's position just from the impact.The burning jet fuel caused the steel ribbing to melt and thus the tower went vertically down giving rise to speculations that it was a planned demolition...which it wasn't.

 

[Developereo]

This line of 'logic' can be applied to an ordinary housefire. Is it a coincident that there was a water main break? Is it a coincident that the fire department was 5 miles away? Is it a coincident that blah blah blah...? You are looking for coincidences where there are none. May be you should take your own advice and use google in a more OBJECTIVE manner.

Making fun of people's English may get cheap laughs from your buddies and thank yous from the ubiquitous Indian sycophants, but they don't do much to advance your cause.

 

[gambit]

Making fun of people's English may get cheap laughs from your buddies and thank yous from the ubiquitous Indian sycophants, but they don't do much to advance your cause.

coincident - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

How I spelled the word 'coincident' had nothing to do with the man's language skills. I was questioning his ability to think logically. Freakin' unbelievable.

 

[Developereo]

coincident - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

How I spelled the word 'coincident' had nothing to do with the man's language skills. I was questioning his ability to think logically. Freakin' unbelievable.

I am well aware of the difference between coincident (adjective) and coincidence (noun).

You were using it as a noun, mocking his misuse, and you did it repeatedly.

In any case, I don't want to distract from the topic any more.

 

[MastanKhan]

Hi,

Normally tall building are rated for helicopter landings---but not for all kinds---large millitary helicopters cannot land on the roof tops of hardly any building inthe u s of a----so a load of 100000 lbs maybe evastating for the building.

It is just an assumption that the building will stand an impact of a full size plane---now we know it won't----a 100000 lbs plane flying at 550 miles per hr slamming into a building would hit it with such a massive force like never ben hit before---so what would be the force foot lbs----in millions----------!!!

Now all the steel pillars have sheared off where the plane went through----the top portion is without the support of those pillars----secondly----there is an exess weight of 100000 lbs on the building---first the mega foot lb force ( speed / weight ) of the impact would have popped out thousands of rivets from the steel girders---also a lots of girders would have sheared off as well due to impact.

The rest was just a matter of time---.

The attacks succeeded due to inter agency rivalry---incompetant supervisors and a totally ignorant and non-chalant---I give a sh-it attitude of the american supervisor of the beureau and the agency.

Al-qaeda had done its job---there was nothing else---remember the arrests after 9/11 and the deportations---the system was pretty well cleansed.

9/11 is not a pakistani issue---it is between the arabs and the americans---why does pakistan want to become a party---why are the pakistanis mad---pakistan has not suffered.

Pakistanis must remember that the palestinians---who have suffered the most never ever targetted mainland united states.

Pakistanis read articles by some europeans and americans about 9 / 11 scenarios and start believing in them----and not realizing that these articles are intentionally designed to keep the pakistani / muslim community in an eternal conflict about the issue---common sense would reason---it has happened---let us move ahead----pakistani mentality is---let me go back in time and turn the clock back---the Nawaz Sharif mentality----and negate any gains.