What's new

Feeling the Decline of US Power and the Growing Influence of China - Perspective of an Overseas PhD

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
Letter to Editor: Feeling the Decline of American Soft Power and the Growing Influence of China at an International Conference -- The Perspective of an Overseas Chinese PhD Student

By Zheng Liping, Free University of Berlin, Germany (People's Daily Online) October 30, 2017


FOREIGN201710301650000206053741080.jpg



While the Western Media paid unprecedented attention to China’s 19th Communist Party Congress, as a Chinese PhD student based in Berlin, I deeply felt the growing influence of China at an academic conference held at the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences on October 20-21, 2017.

It was the tenth-anniversary conference of the Graduate School of North American Studies, affiliated with the John F. Kennedy Institute of North American Studies at the Free University of Berlin. The elaborately organized event invited dozens of top scholars and diplomats from the U.S., Great Britain, Canada, Germany, and so on to give remarks or present research talks primarily pertinent to American Studies and a variety of salient problems America is faced with at present. The meeting’s theme was “The Fault Lines of Democracy.” Surprisingly, some scholars’ talks and discussions touched upon China frequently. As one of the only two Chinese doctoral students present at the conference, I actively took advantage of the occasion to offer my Chinese perspective to the international audience. Two interrelated issues relevant to China are worth sharing here: exceptionalism and national narrative in globalization.

The Dimming Halo of the American Dream and American Exceptionalism

Most scholars pointed out that liberal democracy in the era of Donald Trump was in jeopardy and underlined that America was not as exceptional as it used to be. From their viewpoints, under the leadership of Trump, many things are ruining American Exceptionalism, a nationalistic concept that inspires the idea of the American Dream and generates American soft power. At the core of American Exceptionalism are American values, such as democracy, freedom, and equality. Many American presidents are famous for their steadfast endorsement of the uniqueness and superiority of the American creed. For example, Abraham Lincoln called America “the last, best hope of the earth,” and Ronald Reagan proudly claimed America to be “a shining city upon a hill.” Over the course of American history, these ideas have shaped the American Dream, which means that one can obtain happiness and success through their own hard work on the land of infinite possibilities and opportunities. Therefore, most American people identify the greatness of the American nation with “a beacon to the world.” Undoubtedly, millions of immigrants from all over the world were enchanted by such soft power, symbolized in American Exceptionalism and the American Dream.

However, much evidence has shown that the attraction of American soft power seems to be weakening. One the one hand, a number of domestic and foreign policies made by the Trump Administration are increasingly marring the American image that is conventionally labeled as democratic values and its ambition as a global superpower leading also with its cultural ideology. To the astonishment of Paul Gilroy from King’s College London, who gave a talk on “Anti-racism in the Era of the Alt-right,” Trump becomes the only American president ever in history who discredited American Exceptionalism. Since his presidency in January this year, Trump has been undermining the political and cultural legacy of his predecessor Barack Obama, who is iconized as the living example of the American Dream. As U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders criticized on his visit to Free University of Berlin in July 2017, “I am very concerned about Donald Trump’s disrespect for democracy, for tolerance, and traditional American values….I am outraged at President Trump’s efforts to divide the American people up on the basis of race, religion, or national origin.” Additionally, according to the Pew Research Center’s recent Global Attitudes Survey, America’s overall image has suffered a dramatic decline among world publics of 37 nations polled, primarily due to Trump’s provocative policy and unconventional leadership.

On the other hand, the Chinese Dream, as well as the emergence of Chinese Exceptionalism, is likely to outshine the American Dream, thus attracting many international concerns in the media and academia. Clearly, Western scholars at the conference generally agreed to the fact that China was increasingly becoming powerful and assertive on the world stage and that its international clout was spreading. Nevertheless, they are very wary of this tendency of the so-called power diffusion from the West to the East, because their stereotypical idea tends to identify China with communism, which they think starkly conflicts with the superiority of democracy. As we know, after the victory of the Cold War, political scientist Francis Fukuyama’s argument of “the end of the history”—namely “the end point of mankind’s ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government,” has had a great influence upon Western people’s self-perception of the superiority of their democratic values. It is palpable that the pervasive aversion to the ideology of communism engrained in the minds of Western people not only aggravates their anxiety and fear of the Chinese nation’s great rejuvenation, but also invokes their profound reflections on the crisis of democracy in the U.S. and Europe at large. For instance, Christian Lammert—professor of political science from the Kennedy Institute of North American Studies has recently published a timely book titled Die Krise der Demokratie und Wie Wir Sie Überwinden Können (The Crisis of Democracy and How We Can Overcome It, 2017).

China’s narrative in globalization: more than prosperity

Several scholars put forward that the economic downturn of the U.S. formed a sharp contrast with China’s remarkable ascent to power in recent decades, but the U.S. should not simply attribute a range of its political and economic problems to globalization. It is highly controversial that Trump retreated from international institutions and turned to a new era of isolationism and protectionism, given that China is continuously opening its doors to the world and integrating into the international community. By providing substantial data, political scientist Marianne Braig from the Latin American Institute at Free University of Berlin illustrated that in the market of Mexico, Chinese products had succeeded in replacing the role of the U.S., which dominated the foreign trade of Mexico in the last century. Strikingly, Julika Griem, a cultural scholar from Goethe University Frankfurt, argued that strategic narratives for nation states, as well as languages, culture, and communication, did matter in globalization. Obviously, Trump’s counternarrative of globalization does not make sense.

Their discussion made mention of China repeatedly. I naturally felt an urge to speak for China on this precious occasion. My response on the spot was as follows:

You have talked a lot about China. I am from China and would like to take this opportunity to introduce more to all of you. Owing to globalization, China has created amazing economic achievements. As a great beneficiary of globalization, China has not only promoted the development of globalization, but also will keep moving forward to make more contributions to international cooperation and global prosperity. The One Belt One Road initiative, which last audience has just mentioned in his question, is the best evidence for China’s effort to boost globalization. Besides, China has much more public goods to offer to the world people. China is a civilization-state with 5000 years of history and brilliant culture. The Chinese narrative representing China’s unique national and cultural identity is embodied in China’s foreign policy and diplomacy, which are committed to the noble cause for the world’s peace, development, harmony, stability, security, and all the like. China hopes to impress world people not only with its material growth but also cultural values, which abound in Chinese traditional and modern culture. Economically and culturally, the rising China is ready to share its wisdom and experience with the world for the common good.

Joseph Nye, who is widely reputed as the father of soft power, states an important point in many of his books concerning power: “The future of power is a matter of whose story wins.” When it comes to the Chinese Dream, Chinese Exceptionalism, and the Chinese narrative, in my mind they are to a certain extent three interrelated concepts, which constitute one core concept—the soft power of China. To realize the Chinese Dream, the discourse of Chinese Exceptionalism plays a role in presenting a persuasive story-telling of China. When the Chinese Dream comes true, the world will see a more prosperous and harmonious China with both hard and soft power.

http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/1030/c90000-9286609.html
 
. .
China, I believe, can reach the level which never ever any other country can. That is, its economy and military might are equal to all other countries, combined.

And it is not my dream. Just history cycle. China was at this position for most time of recorded human history.
 
.
Opinion: A Moment With the Future China

Oct 31st, 2017
by Bouthaina Shaaban
for Al-Watan

In the wake of the CCP's National Congress, President Assad's political advisor comments on the inevitable rise of China at the expense of the West

IMG-VDF-16902.jpg


The Arab media did not pause at the most important event in recent days, because the Western media and its affiliates were not interested in highlighting it. This was the Chinese Communist Party’s issuances of decisions and strategies which developed the vision for the future of China until the year 2035, and then a further vision to 2050. In order to illuminate this important event, we should make it clear that this vision was the result of dialogues and discussions from the party’s base to its top, which lasted more than a year, and drew for China a new horizon, economically, politically, and socially, by putting forward a bold and firm vision for the country’s future, and heralding the dawn of a new age of Chinese prosperity and power.

China will present its vision of change in the world through its new “Silk Road” (the One Belt One Road Initiative), which is a path for global trade which passes through 60 countries in Asia and Europe, and will change the relationships between these countries and their economic situation. The Chinese president, Xi Jinping, did not forget to note that his country would be a force of peace and security in the world, acknowledging the sovereignty of nations with no desire to interfere in their internal affairs. However, all the United States saw in this important event was that China will become its biggest competitor by 2025, as noted by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joseph Dunford. While U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said that America would not hesitate to address what he called instances of China undermining sovereignty of neighboring countries and its harm to America and its friends.

I believe that the damage to the United States results first and foremost from its own imperialist nature and its arbitrary policies which display an obvious confusion in current American policy, first and foremost, in stealing the riches of peoples and using threats, intimidation, sanctions, war, and terrorism against the countries of the world — except Israel — including sovereign states which have never shown hostility toward Washington. At a time when we see a clear vision of a capable state which understands its position in the world, and is keen to ensure its credibility, and to accumulate the elements of its power, as China is doing, we also notice, on the other side, the United States issuing harsh sanctions here, and supporting terrorism in preventing communication between two neighboring Arab countries, and supporting a class of mercenaries whom it is complicit with to seize gas and oil resources, while accusing all who do not follow it and Israel — a policy carried out through its purchase of agents here and punishing the disobedient there.

Because of the West’s monopoly over most global media, the world is still dealing with the new and beneficial model offered by China. The West’s colonial legacy still dazzles many, and leads them to search for points of strength in the Western powers, even though it has become clear that we are witnessing today a true fall of these powers, and a collapse in their moral commitments, and its honesty with itself and with others. If the United States was the one planning dazzling strategies extending midway into the next century, we would find the Western media promoting the strength and greatness and intellect represented by America, while praising its leadership of the world, and devoting programs and articles and discussions to discovering the secrets of this strength. But the important event in China, which envisioned a future world very different from the world which we see today, did not enjoy any of the interest it deserved. This must be a result of the dazzlement and the mentality of dependency which makes it impossible for the media rid itself of this political and psychological legacy.

Some observers have predicted a future inevitable confrontation between China and the United States, but I personally do not see any real data indicating that this is coming at all, because the disintegration of power in the United States and Europe will happen on their own, while China, which is adopting its role as a brick in a diverse world, with understanding and respect and a cooperative view, will ascend to the throne of the future and will offer a new model for the great power, which is not governed by weapons, finance and oil companies alone, but focuses on promoting international equity and justice, and opposes any actions which aim to impose the will of one over the other, or to intervene in the internal affairs of states, and the use of power to oppress the weak.

President Xi said that whatever China’s power reaches, it will never strive for domination or expansion, and nodded to the retreat of U.S. leadership, saying: “No country alone can address the many challenges facing mankind, and no country can afford to retreat into self isolation.”

China’s strategy has focused on respecting the other and the real belief in human unity. No doubt that this moral strategy will defeat the Western imperialist strategies which are based on the principles of intervention, the theft of people’s resources, oppressing weak countries with force, supporting terrorism in order to achieve political aims, and using the veto power to prevent the people of Palestine from establishing their country — and the list goes on.

This article was translated and edited by The Syrian Observer. Responsibility for the information and views set out in this article lies entirely with the author.

http://syrianobserver.com/EN/Commentary/33453

@Stranagor
 
. .
This letter reminded me about the Soviet Union and their mouthpiece Pravda during the heyday of the Cold War.
 
. .
China's economy and military can without a doubt overtake the US, but I don't know about soft power. American pop culture is super popular worldwide and english is the universal language which puts China at a disadvantage in the area of softpower.
 
.
Here is a German article about the 19th Party Congress. It's more interesting to go through the comment section as it reflects what most people think of China. You will notice that all comments that are positively rated (green) are pro-China while the red rated comments were anti-China.

"China is no more a passive spectator"

https://www.heise.de/tp/news/China-Kein-passiver-Zuschauer-mehr-3875634.html
 
.
Here is a German article about the 19th Party Congress. It's more interesting to go through the comment section as it reflects what most people think of China. You will notice that all comments that are positively rated (green) are pro-China while the red rated comments were anti-China.

"China is no more a passive spectator"

https://www.heise.de/tp/news/China-Kein-passiver-Zuschauer-mehr-3875634.html

If it were in China (including Taiwan, positive would be red and negative would be green).

:partay:

Interesting, (of course, one stat does not reflect everything) the closer you may get to the US, the more fearful you may become of them. Those countries that border the US or have the US mercenary military (or the NATO) on their soil are the most fearful of the US.

upload_2017-11-1_15-50-14.png


This letter reminded me about the Soviet Union and their mouthpiece Pravda during the heyday of the Cold War.

I know critical thinking is sin in India.
 
Last edited:
. .
Here is a German article about the 19th Party Congress. It's more interesting to go through the comment section as it reflects what most people think of China. You will notice that all comments that are positively rated (green) are pro-China while the red rated comments were anti-China.

"China is no more a passive spectator"

https://www.heise.de/tp/news/China-Kein-passiver-Zuschauer-mehr-3875634.html
Interesting interpretation: two green marked comments on the first page say:

die gelbe Gefahr

die Oberschicht hat den Western an China verkauft.

And you say the comments are pro China.
 
.
Critical thinking requires assessing all information, not just those published in state-controlled media.
This was written by a PHD student not state controled media so hoe is thay relevant? Or. Are you trying to say that an average Chinese will not think possitive of his or her nation? Fact is, if indians can be so proud of the disaster which is india, its not inconceivable that many chinese would have a possitive opionion of their country (not government) but their country and where it is headed!

In order for us to take each other seriously, we need to dissuade members of this forum from using double standards! A chinese or indain or wven American being proud or writing pro articles about their country does not equate to state sponsorships!
 
.
Interesting interpretation: two green marked comments on the first page say:

die gelbe Gefahr

die Oberschicht hat den Western an China verkauft.

And you say the comments are pro China.


Did you even read what that person wrote?

Hinzu kommt, dass China überall auf der Welt investiert. Und anders als der Westen glauben die Chinesen an Harmonie und Ordnung - eine Ordnung unter chinesischer Hegemonie zwar, aber Ordnung. Der Westen hat das Chaos zelebriert.

My translation: On top of that, China is investing everywhere in the world. Contrary to the West, the Chinese believe in harmony and order – though a harmony under Chinese hegemony but there is order. the West has been celebrating chaos.

Does that sound anti-China and pro-West?


LOL @ Gelbe Gefahr (Yellow peril)

That guy in fact criticised the rassist tone of the red rated comments. His post is totally pro-China.

Do you even read beyond the title? Or is your command of German so bad? :lol:
 
.
Did you even read what that person wrote?



My translation: On top of that, China is investing everywhere in the world. Contrary to the West, the Chinese believe in harmony and order – though a harmony under Chinese hegemony but there is order. the West has been celebrating chaos.

Does that sound anti-China and pro-West?


LOL @ Gelbe Gefahr (Yellow peril)

That guy in fact criticised the rassist tone of the red rated comments. His post is totally pro-China.

Do you even read beyond the title? Or is your command of German so bad? :lol:
Do refugees in German speak gooood German?

Letter to Editor: Feeling the Decline of American Soft Power and the Growing Influence of China at an International Conference -- The Perspective of an Overseas Chinese PhD Student

By Zheng Liping, Free University of Berlin, Germany (People's Daily Online) October 30, 2017


FOREIGN201710301650000206053741080.jpg



While the Western Media paid unprecedented attention to China’s 19th Communist Party Congress, as a Chinese PhD student based in Berlin, I deeply felt the growing influence of China at an academic conference held at the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences on October 20-21, 2017.

It was the tenth-anniversary conference of the Graduate School of North American Studies, affiliated with the John F. Kennedy Institute of North American Studies at the Free University of Berlin. The elaborately organized event invited dozens of top scholars and diplomats from the U.S., Great Britain, Canada, Germany, and so on to give remarks or present research talks primarily pertinent to American Studies and a variety of salient problems America is faced with at present. The meeting’s theme was “The Fault Lines of Democracy.” Surprisingly, some scholars’ talks and discussions touched upon China frequently. As one of the only two Chinese doctoral students present at the conference, I actively took advantage of the occasion to offer my Chinese perspective to the international audience. Two interrelated issues relevant to China are worth sharing here: exceptionalism and national narrative in globalization.

The Dimming Halo of the American Dream and American Exceptionalism

Most scholars pointed out that liberal democracy in the era of Donald Trump was in jeopardy and underlined that America was not as exceptional as it used to be. From their viewpoints, under the leadership of Trump, many things are ruining American Exceptionalism, a nationalistic concept that inspires the idea of the American Dream and generates American soft power. At the core of American Exceptionalism are American values, such as democracy, freedom, and equality. Many American presidents are famous for their steadfast endorsement of the uniqueness and superiority of the American creed. For example, Abraham Lincoln called America “the last, best hope of the earth,” and Ronald Reagan proudly claimed America to be “a shining city upon a hill.” Over the course of American history, these ideas have shaped the American Dream, which means that one can obtain happiness and success through their own hard work on the land of infinite possibilities and opportunities. Therefore, most American people identify the greatness of the American nation with “a beacon to the world.” Undoubtedly, millions of immigrants from all over the world were enchanted by such soft power, symbolized in American Exceptionalism and the American Dream.

However, much evidence has shown that the attraction of American soft power seems to be weakening. One the one hand, a number of domestic and foreign policies made by the Trump Administration are increasingly marring the American image that is conventionally labeled as democratic values and its ambition as a global superpower leading also with its cultural ideology. To the astonishment of Paul Gilroy from King’s College London, who gave a talk on “Anti-racism in the Era of the Alt-right,” Trump becomes the only American president ever in history who discredited American Exceptionalism. Since his presidency in January this year, Trump has been undermining the political and cultural legacy of his predecessor Barack Obama, who is iconized as the living example of the American Dream. As U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders criticized on his visit to Free University of Berlin in July 2017, “I am very concerned about Donald Trump’s disrespect for democracy, for tolerance, and traditional American values….I am outraged at President Trump’s efforts to divide the American people up on the basis of race, religion, or national origin.” Additionally, according to the Pew Research Center’s recent Global Attitudes Survey, America’s overall image has suffered a dramatic decline among world publics of 37 nations polled, primarily due to Trump’s provocative policy and unconventional leadership.

On the other hand, the Chinese Dream, as well as the emergence of Chinese Exceptionalism, is likely to outshine the American Dream, thus attracting many international concerns in the media and academia. Clearly, Western scholars at the conference generally agreed to the fact that China was increasingly becoming powerful and assertive on the world stage and that its international clout was spreading. Nevertheless, they are very wary of this tendency of the so-called power diffusion from the West to the East, because their stereotypical idea tends to identify China with communism, which they think starkly conflicts with the superiority of democracy. As we know, after the victory of the Cold War, political scientist Francis Fukuyama’s argument of “the end of the history”—namely “the end point of mankind’s ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government,” has had a great influence upon Western people’s self-perception of the superiority of their democratic values. It is palpable that the pervasive aversion to the ideology of communism engrained in the minds of Western people not only aggravates their anxiety and fear of the Chinese nation’s great rejuvenation, but also invokes their profound reflections on the crisis of democracy in the U.S. and Europe at large. For instance, Christian Lammert—professor of political science from the Kennedy Institute of North American Studies has recently published a timely book titled Die Krise der Demokratie und Wie Wir Sie Überwinden Können (The Crisis of Democracy and How We Can Overcome It, 2017).

China’s narrative in globalization: more than prosperity

Several scholars put forward that the economic downturn of the U.S. formed a sharp contrast with China’s remarkable ascent to power in recent decades, but the U.S. should not simply attribute a range of its political and economic problems to globalization. It is highly controversial that Trump retreated from international institutions and turned to a new era of isolationism and protectionism, given that China is continuously opening its doors to the world and integrating into the international community. By providing substantial data, political scientist Marianne Braig from the Latin American Institute at Free University of Berlin illustrated that in the market of Mexico, Chinese products had succeeded in replacing the role of the U.S., which dominated the foreign trade of Mexico in the last century. Strikingly, Julika Griem, a cultural scholar from Goethe University Frankfurt, argued that strategic narratives for nation states, as well as languages, culture, and communication, did matter in globalization. Obviously, Trump’s counternarrative of globalization does not make sense.

Their discussion made mention of China repeatedly. I naturally felt an urge to speak for China on this precious occasion. My response on the spot was as follows:

You have talked a lot about China. I am from China and would like to take this opportunity to introduce more to all of you. Owing to globalization, China has created amazing economic achievements. As a great beneficiary of globalization, China has not only promoted the development of globalization, but also will keep moving forward to make more contributions to international cooperation and global prosperity. The One Belt One Road initiative, which last audience has just mentioned in his question, is the best evidence for China’s effort to boost globalization. Besides, China has much more public goods to offer to the world people. China is a civilization-state with 5000 years of history and brilliant culture. The Chinese narrative representing China’s unique national and cultural identity is embodied in China’s foreign policy and diplomacy, which are committed to the noble cause for the world’s peace, development, harmony, stability, security, and all the like. China hopes to impress world people not only with its material growth but also cultural values, which abound in Chinese traditional and modern culture. Economically and culturally, the rising China is ready to share its wisdom and experience with the world for the common good.

Joseph Nye, who is widely reputed as the father of soft power, states an important point in many of his books concerning power: “The future of power is a matter of whose story wins.” When it comes to the Chinese Dream, Chinese Exceptionalism, and the Chinese narrative, in my mind they are to a certain extent three interrelated concepts, which constitute one core concept—the soft power of China. To realize the Chinese Dream, the discourse of Chinese Exceptionalism plays a role in presenting a persuasive story-telling of China. When the Chinese Dream comes true, the world will see a more prosperous and harmonious China with both hard and soft power.

http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/1030/c90000-9286609.html
Fake meeting.
According to RSS, everyone is talking about SP2012 in any international meeting.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom