Now now, please quote again the part where it says every /Middle easternerAsian man is a rapist.
Your statement implies they are.You don't have to call somebody something directly, when you can imply it, and deny it later. Everyone here sees your game.
Yea, not really, it's based on the fact there's not an unlimited amount of room for foreigners that aren't compatible with my culture. And you have problems with this, because you, yourself are an immigrant.
Myself being an immigrant has nothing to do with this conversation, it has to do with facts. This is a contradiction to your previous comments. Your entire point was that you have a problem with all immigrants, not just those that aren't compatible with your culture. Besides, as long as people are following the law, and they go to France legally, why should they be forced to follow your culture? This is a fallacy in your type of thinkiing.
Asylum seekers usually cannot be deported back to their home country because their home countries are in perpetual state of chaos or will be for the considerable future.
Actually, they can be, and they have been. Pakistan is doing it right now with Afghans, because it has no obligation to keep them safe for so long. Helping people is one thing, but doing so for years is not something that any nation is obligated to do under international law, or morally.
Refugees, illegals, it's all the same. It all contributes to tip the balance . Now call me racist some more. I love it and it just shows how you cannot diferentiate between a racist and a patriot.
Furthermore, a lot of illegal immigrants claim asylum shelter upon being caught, blurring the lines even further between what's what.
Refugees, and illegal immigrants aren't the same at all, so your argument here doesn't make much sense. I can differentiate between a racist and a patriot. A patriot believes in his nation's strength and honor, a racist thinks that every other nation is inferior to theirs, which you clearly think.
Here, article about classic fence jumpers, turned probable asylum seekers. But if you actually knew what you were talking about you'd be well aware of this and me linking you asylum stats is not my slip up and supposedly me making a point for you as you so shallowly concluded, but rather an attempt to inform you.
And here is where you failed to actually read your comment...
The immigrants who got into Melilla on Wednesday were heading for the city's temporary migration centre, where they are usually fed and given clothes before Spain tries to work out whether they can be repatriated or can stay in the country.
So in the end, it's Spain's decision. By the way, why are you presenting sources on foreign nations, when we're talking about France? They're both in the EU, but they're still different nations with differing laws.
It's not so much that you're informing me of something, rather you're trying to use a post-hoc argument.
But I thought you said that there was no difference? Thank you for making my point.
Quite rich, coming from someone who hasn't provided a shred of sources to his claims, but is just spewing at the mouth for 2 days now....
Funny you should say that, because I'm not making any claims at all, I'm questioning your claims, all of which you're misrepresenting facts on, and twisting definitions with.
Yes, you can. You really are clueless, especially about the conditions which are prevalent in 3rd world building sites. But that's irelevant, as anyone with a few hour's worth of instructions and proper monitoring can become a construction worker. It is literally the job for people with no formal education.
No you can't, you actually need quite a bit of training and certification to go into construction. Saying that 3rd wor'd building site condition doesn't change this global fact. Those that work without any proper certification aren't construction workers, they're nothing more than handymen; That's not the same thing. learn to use logic.
For your standards. See, this is exactly the cultural rift i am talking about. You just don't have high enough standards. And we are supposed to allow an uncontrolled influx of refugees and illegals in here, which will, through democracy get an ever bigger share of votes. Which, consequentially means our countries will gravitate towards the levels of countries the said refugees/illegals came from. And we just don't want that. If you can't accept that, it' your problem completely.
Since when did illegal immigrants and refugees get the right to vote in national elections? If they did, then that should be fixed to where they can't. Still, it's funny how you're using a straw man argument here, when you really have no real point to make, other than saying that you're superior to everyone.
Ecowas = Mali, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Liberia. Do you even know what you are saying? What you are presenting as "doing well off"?
You really know nothing.
Outside of Mali, the other nations are actually doing well off. Nigeria is in the middle of an insurgency, but their economy is growing fast, and it has one of the fasting growing middle classes in the entire continent, similar story with IC, and Liberia.
this is my original quote, and as you are an intellectual midget, ill explain it
Says the person who's arguments make little to no sense. Seriously, nothing you're saying makes any damn sense at all. Literally nothing.
This means, immigrants kick and scream about the prospects of curbing immigration in the countries they emigrated to
(case in point-you again) and all we , natives, need to do, is look at the condition in their home countries and we see what happens if we let too many inside.[/quote]
An assumption based on a racist mindset. Instead of looking at geopolitical situations, and global politics, you're blaming the people for the conditions of their home nations. It's pathetic really, how you say you aren't a racist, but continue to make arguments you'd find on a site like stormfront, or metawiki.
I know you'll accuse me of racism 3 times over in this post, but nothing is really racist. It's just caring for my home and preserving it for my children.
But again, as you are an immigrant, to whom this very debate is threatening, you refuse to acknowledge some pretty simple facts of life.
You aren't trying to preserve anything for your children (assuming you have any), you're trying to simply attack anyone who's different. I can honestly say that 90% of the arguments you're making on the forum, you won't say when you're outside in the general public, because you and I both know that what you're saying is racist, nothing more.
I don't have to feel threatened by anything, because I don't live in France, nor the EU. I'm also a citizen of Canada, so nothing that happens in France will affect me in any which way.
What a waste of my time. I can't believe I spent 2 days on someone as dense as you.