What's new

F-35 Performing Flanker like maneuvers.

. .
Here come the Vatniks claiming that the Russian jets are superior even though they were never filmed doing incredible maneuvers with combat load and more than 50% fuel.
 
. .
Here come the Vatniks claiming that the Russian jets are superior even though they were never filmed doing incredible maneuvers with combat load and more than 50% fuel.
F-35 have noticeably better maneuverability than Russian Su-35S


This is just the beginning...

@Foxtrot Delta
@Shah_G
 
Last edited:
. .
Look at this fellows
Is the video so nice you had to post it twice? I saw nothing impressive there; the only thing that merits mention is some manoeuvre approximating a falling leaf. I did, however, see a belch of smoke at 2:56. Is that the stealth system? Disappear into a black cloud?
 
.
Engine.
It would be SU 57 vs F 35.
;)

F-35 feature a very powerful engine; T/W ratio definitely exceeds 1:1 but exact figure is classified.

Still, a single-engine Jet humiliating one of the Russia's finest in twin-engine designs...

Is the video so nice you had to post it twice? I saw nothing impressive there; the only thing that merits mention is some manoeuvre approximating a falling leaf. I did, however, see a belch of smoke at 2:56. Is that the stealth system? Disappear into a black cloud?
Nothing impressive there? Are you kidding me?

As for the smoke - do you think this is supercruise or something? These are extreme dogfighting maneuvers to begin with - engine will be stressed under these conditions.

Nevertheless, check the video which I have shared. F-35 have superior maneuverability than Russian SU-35S. This is FAR from easy to accomplish with extremely sensitive VLO characteristics in the equation.
 
Last edited:
. .
F-35 feature a very powerful engine; T/W ratio definitely exceeds 1:1 but exact figure is classified.

Still, a single-engine Jet humiliating one of the Russia's finest in twin-engine designs...
That finest design is using AL-41F1S Engines which are giving it combined thrust of 170.6 fighter, EW is 17200,has loaded weight of 25300 while MTW is 34500.
Now F-35
Uses very advance and light material for airframe construction,F135 produces 125 KN thrust,EW is 13154,has loaded weight of 22426 while MTW is 32000.
Both are very different designs.F-35 has better engine and low weight.
Produce them first lmao
If i am not wrong it's going through LRIP.
 
.
Su-35 has thrust vectoring that enables it to stall in the air. F-35 don't have that. You need 2 thrust vectoring engines to be able to stall in the air.

F-35 feature a very powerful engine; T/W ratio definitely exceeds 1:1 but exact figure is classified.

Still, a single-engine Jet humiliating one of the Russia's finest in twin-engine designs...

Su-35 compared to F-35 is like Super Hornet compared to F-16. Sure, F-16 has a large powerful engine but Super Hornet has 2 smaller less powerful engines.
 
.
Su-35 has thrust vectoring that enables it to stall in the air. F-35 don't have that. You need 2 thrust vectoring engines to be able to stall in the air.



Su-35 compared to F-35 is like Super Hornet compared to F-16. Sure, F-16 has a large powerful engine but Super Hornet has 2 smaller less powerful engines.
Stupid and wrong oversimplification.
 
. .
Is the video so nice you had to post it twice? I saw nothing impressive there; the only thing that merits mention is some manoeuvre approximating a falling leaf. I did, however, see a belch of smoke at 2:56. Is that the stealth system? Disappear into a black cloud?
You kidding?
Nothing impressive? If that doesn't amazes you then there is nothing in the real world that would, you better watch star trek.
And for posting video twice, i used two ways to provide links so viewers won't have to face problem while playing it, btw don't worry it'll not consume much of your bandwidth.

Engine.
It would be SU 57 vs F 35.
That would be some what fair comparison.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom