F-22 / F-35 5th Generation jets | News & Discussions.

[Gomig-21]

So the F-35 is coming to our local airshow next month. Will try to get there early to get a front seat to snap some close-up shots. I'll get a video of its flight demo as well.

 

[Gomig-21]

Gaggle of Raptors.

 

[randomradio]

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/ar...-f_35s-delivered-until-2024-are-obsolete.html

Fully 74% of Export F-35s Delivered Until 2023 Are Obsolete

Three-quarters of all the F-35 Joint Strike Fighters delivered to foreign customers until 2023 are obsolete and will require major retrofits before they can deliver their promised performance.

An analysis of F-35 contracts awarded to date shows that fully 343 – or 74% -- of the 460 export F-35s that Lockheed is to deliver until end 2024 will be in the current, obsolete Low-Rate Initial Production configuration.

These 343 aircraft are limited both in terms of operational capabilities and of the weapons they can use. They are, and will remain, obsolete because their software is incomplete and because their sensors – designed over 20 years ago – have been overtaken by several generations electronics progress.

Lockheed and the F-35 Joint Program Office have quietly decided that all of the planned sensor and avionics upgrades needed to bring the F-35 to full capability will be deferred until 2023, when the first Full-Rate Production (FRP) aircraft (Lot 15) will begin to roll off the production lines.

All this, however, is a best-case scenario, and assumes that the F-35 will pass its Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E). Due to be completed in 2019 or 2020, IOT&E will allow the Pentagon to take the (Milestone C) decision to launch Full-Rate Production (FRP).

If it doesn’t – and the GAO reported on June 5 that “As of January 2018, the F-35 program had 966 open deficiencies, of which 111 category 1 (critical)” – then all bets are off, and the program will have to undergo a major restructuring.

Fully-capable F-35 only after 2023

Aircraft of the first Full-Rate Production batch (Lot 15) will be the first to benefit from the new package of sensors, electronics and software bringing them to full capability, and which will notably include:

-- a new TR-3 (Technology Refresh 3) computer supplied by Harris Corporation that is key to allowing integration of the new capabilities planned for the Block 4 standard. This will include computing infrastructure for new panoramic cockpit displays, advanced memory systems and navigation technology, according to Brad Truesdell, Harris Corp.’s senior director of aviation systems.

-- Raytheon’s new Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System, which Lockheed announced June 13 would replace Northrop Grumman’s current AN/AAQ-37.

-- a new Advanced Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS) to replace the current system, also made by Lockheed. The company says the current EOTS meets all the contractual specifications, but that the new system – which offers a significant increase in terms of target recognition and detection capability – “would be a further upgrade option purchased at the discretion of the DOD and international F-35 partners and customers,” Lockheed told FlightGlobal at the time.

-- a new Panoramic Cockpit Display System (PCDS) made by Elbit Systems of America. In June 2017, Elbit announced a contract from Lockheed Martin to develop a panoramic cockpit display unit to replace the current one, made by L3 Aviation Products.

These new sensors are crucial for the F-35 to achieve the capabilities it was designed to deliver, but which are still not available today, after 17 years of development. Lockheed says, for example, that the new DAS will have five times the reliability and twice the performance of the current system, despite being 45% cheaper to buy and 50% cheaper to operate.

However, Lot 15 deliveries will only begin in early 2023 and, meanwhile, deliveries will continue with the current electronics and sensors.

The US services will also receive obsolete aircraft, but their problem is less severe because they all operate other kinds of combat aircraft, and because they already have indicated they may use the early aircraft for flight-training or as spare parts banks if the cost of upgrading them to Block 4 standard is too expensive.

This is not an option for export customers, however, as for several – notably Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands -- the F-35 will be the only combat aircraft, while for all others it is the primary strike aircraft.

Allies to receive obsolete aircraft until 2022

Until 2023, all the Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) aircraft ordered by the program’s foreign partners (Australia, Denmark, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Turkey and the United Kingdom) and Foreign Military Sales customers (Israel, Japan and South Korea) will be delivered in the current configuration.

They will require substantial -- and expensive -- upgrades to bring them up to the latest Block 4 standard, after the new sensors and electronics become available in 2023.

The cost of developing and implementing the Block 4 configuration is as yet unknown, and figures have been quoted of between $3.9 billion and as much as $16.4 billion.

In any case, it is high enough that the F-35 Program Executive Officer, Vice Admiral Mat Winter, “said his office is exploring the option of leaving 108 aircraft in their current state because the funds to upgrade them to the fully combat-capable configuration would threaten the Air Force’s plans to ramp up production in the coming years,” according to an October 2017 report by the Project On Government Oversight (POGO)

To our knowledge, European operators of the F-35 also have “overlooked” mentioning the cost of upgrading their older aircraft to Block 4 standard when reporting to their respective Parliaments, to which they will now have to go cap-in-hand to request the necessary funds. One can imagine the welcome they will receive from their lawmakers.

And Block 4 is non-negotiable because unless upgraded, all F-35s delivered before 2023 will be severely limited in their capabilities and will only be able to use very few weapons.

Lockheed is currently delivering aircraft with the latest Block 3F software, the first “combat-capable” standard. Block 3F should (but maybe will not) be retrofitted to earlier aircraft. Block 3F allows the use of the Small Diameter Bomb, Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) and the AIM-9X short-range air-to-air missile, in addition to the Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM), Advanced Short-Range Air-to-Air Missile (ASRAAM) and various kinds of laser-guided bombs used with earlier software.

Only Block 4 allows most capable weapons – after 2023

But only Block 4 will allow the F-35 to use the most capable air-to-air missile in the Western inventory – MBDA’s Meteor – as well as two new long-range missiles being developed specifically for the F-35: the Joint Strike Missile (made by Kongsberg, Norway) and the SOM-J air-launched cruise missile (Roketsan, Turkey) as well as the Small Diameter Bomb II and other cutting-edge weapons to come.

If 74% of all export F-35s will be obsolete when delivered, some export customers will receive an even higher proportion: Australia will receive 63 of its 72 aircraft (87%) in LRIP configuration, while the proportion of LRIP aircraft will attain 100% for South Korea, 81% for Japan and 77% for Norway. (see Table 1 above).

Foreign operators will receive a few of the state-of-the-art Lot 15/Block 4 aircraft after 2023, except for South Korea, whose deliveries will be completed in 2021. Quantities will be limited, however, as for example Norway will receive only 12 Block 4 aircraft out of 52, and Australia only 9 out of 72.

These foreign operators are caught up in a dilemma: the F-35 needs new sensors, but cannot integrate them without new computers and memories that will only be available with Block 4 software, in 2023 at the earliest.

In other words, pray there’s no shooting war in the next 6-7 years.

Assuming they do decide to retrofit Block 4 improvements, export customers will have to pay for it themselves, on top of acquisition and post-delivery upgrade costs.

This is when foreign “partners,” who have already paid a portion of the F-35’s development costs as well as paying for their own aircraft, will realize that they have been abused by Lockheed and the Pentagon who, in their rush to produce as many F-35s as fast as possible, have delivered “fifth-generation” aircraft that do not meet contractual performance and cannot match the capability of “legacy” aircraft like Typhoon, and the latest F-15 and F-16s.

 

[Gomig-21]

These 343 aircraft are limited both in terms of operational capabilities and of the weapons they can use. They are, and will remain, obsolete because their software is incomplete and because their sensors – designed over 20 years ago – have been overtaken by several generations electronics progress.

Yeah not sure I buy that, my friend.

If it doesn’t – and the GAO reported on June 5 that “As of January 2018, the F-35 program had 966 open deficiencies, of which 111 category 1 (critical)” – then all bets are off, and the program will have to undergo a major restructuring.

The things they list as category 1 critical can be a measly as a screw holding a cover on a switch being a little loose. It's ridiculous yet the still list is critical because that's aviation for you. That's why that number is so high. It includes all the little so-so ordinary things you would find in any other aircraft.

-- a new Panoramic Cockpit Display System (PCDS) made by Elbit Systems of America. In June 2017, Elbit announced a contract from Lockheed Martin to develop a panoramic cockpit display unit to replace the current one, made by L3 Aviation Products.

Even with the current panoramic display, there isn't a single other aircraft that has a cockpit layout as sweet and as state of the art like this. So it's already waaaaaaaaaaaay ahead of anything else out there ATM. The fact that there is not HUD since the HMDS takes it place is already revolutionary.

I think calling it "obsolete" is a tad bit ridiculous TBH. Makes you wonder why everyone is lining up to order this bad larry, then, if it's so obsolete?! lol

 

[randomradio]

Yeah not sure I buy that, my friend.



The things they list as category 1 critical can be a measly as a screw holding a cover on a switch being a little loose. It's ridiculous yet the still list is critical because that's aviation for you. That's why that number is so high. It includes all the little so-so ordinary things you would find in any other aircraft.



Even with the current panoramic display, there isn't a single other aircraft that has a cockpit layout as sweet and as state of the art like this. So it's already waaaaaaaaaaaay ahead of anything else out there ATM. The fact that there is not HUD since the HMDS takes it place is already revolutionary.

I think calling it "obsolete" is a tad bit ridiculous TBH. Makes you wonder why everyone is lining up to order this bad larry, then, if it's so obsolete?! lol

The F-35 has not seen capability upgrades to make up for the delays.

You put up a pic of the cockpit, but the upgrade to run the cockpit to its fullest capability will only be added after 2023. And no new weapons until Block 4 either.

And the article is making the point that the export customers haven't even allocated money for the Block 4 upgrades. Only 117 of the 460 jets will be Block 4 capable, and the rest will need new allocation for retrofits. So, in the end, it goes back to all the financial problems associated with the program.

Brazil's Gripen E:

 

[Gomig-21]

And the article is making the point that the export customers haven't even allocated money for the Block 4 upgrades. Only 117 of the 460 jets will be Block 4 capable, and the rest will need new allocation for retrofits. So, in the end, it goes back to all the financial problems associated with the program.

But to call it obsolete? That's the problem with the bashers of this aircraft is that they'll go overboard because they really have an agenda, or just don't like the fact that this aircraft has essentially monopolized many markets. I think most are aware that even without its full, operational capabilities (even if there is merit to that) it still should dominate the skies and people just don't like that. I still think it's a lumbering wild boar compared to the Su-57 or Rafale, but to call it obsolete is simply crazy.

Brazil's Gripen E:

No comparison. Huge difference between a single flat screen with a HUD and many more command buttons and switches and display units and an all in one-function panoramic display with HMDS. Look at the simplicity of the rest of the cockpit. Crazy.

Also, the Grippen is hardly ergonomically designed with the center stick and throttle control on the right like that, compared to the most comfortable design of the stick on the right and throttle on the left. The F-16 revolutionized that concept that makes it much less tiring for pilots in that configuration. There's no arms criss-crossing one another.

 

[randomradio]

But to call it obsolete? That's the problem with the bashers of this aircraft is that they'll go overboard because they really have an agenda, or just don't like the fact that this aircraft has essentially monopolized many markets. I think most are aware that even without its full, operational capabilities (even if there is merit to that) it still should dominate the skies and people just don't like that. I still think it's a lumbering wild boar compared to the Su-57 or Rafale, but to call it obsolete is simply crazy.

That's because the aircraft has not kept up with modern technologies due to the massive delay. For example, even LCA Mk1A will end up carrying a more advanced radar and weapons than the F-35 will. So that's not good for the aircraft. The F-35's configuration is too old.

No comparison. Huge difference between a single flat screen with a HUD and many more command buttons and switches and display units and an all in one-function panoramic display with HMDS. Look at the simplicity of the rest of the cockpit. Crazy.

Also, the Grippen is hardly ergonomically designed with the center stick and throttle control on the right like that, compared to the most comfortable design of the stick on the right and throttle on the left. The F-16 revolutionized that concept that makes it much less tiring for pilots in that configuration. There's no arms criss-crossing one another.

Both cockpits are pretty much the same. Although Gripen comes with a HUD, the HMDS will also have the HUD displayed.

As for cockpit layout, all pilots and air forces have their own opinions.

 

[mil-avia]

Another F-22 From Alaska Had A Catastrophic Engine Failure Days Before NAS Fallon Crash

 

[mil-avia]

Italy will not buy any more F-35s, may cancel existing order

 

[Violet Cold]

F-22s of the USAF train at Ørland Air Station with F-35s of the RNoAF during a mock dogfighting exercise.

F-35s 7, 8 and 9 of the RNoAF land in Norway on 21 September, 2018.

 

[Gomig-21]

F-22s of the USAF train at Ørland Air Station with F-35s of the RNoAF during a mock dogfighting exercise.

Very nice. Look at how reflective those yellow/green reflection plates are under the right lighting conditions. Something you don't see very often.

 

[YeBeWarned]

no Offense to the fans of F-35 but compared to F-22 Raptor , F-35 looks fat and ugly .

 

[gambit]

no Offense to the fans of F-35 but compared to F-22 Raptor , F-35 looks fat and ugly .

Kinda like comparing Demi-Leigh Nel-Peters (Miss Universe) to Adriana Lima. Neither one you would kick out of bed.

 

[YeBeWarned]

Kinda like comparing Demi-Leigh Nel-Peters (Miss Universe) to Adriana Lima. Neither one you would kick out of bed.

Sir , if i am not wrong you once said in some thread about F-22 that its entire body works as a Radar , is that true or false ? if yes than what makes F-22 body work as a Radar ? sorry if that question is stupid

 

[gambit]

Sir , if i am not wrong you once said in some thread about F-22 that its entire body works as a Radar , is that true or false ? if yes than what makes F-22 body work as a Radar ? sorry if that question is stupid

The F-22 have been described as an 'antenna farm' because there are many small antenna arrays in various locations over the body. Whether they are active/passive or passive only is a matter of software based usage, meaning their utilities can be managed and upgrade via software.