Featured F-16.net confirms Su-30MKI loss on 27th Feb

[PakFactor]

I'm sorry if you were not able to sleep for a day or two. Even your white man has also said 'Ah, It makes sense'.

He means it makes all the sense that Su-30 went down.

Let that sink in. And I would encourage you rant and shout more at F-16.net staff (even as the editor has put it).

However, for better or worse, the official F-16 site has endorsed the Su-30 getting a taste of AMRAAM and now I want you to do the following word to word.

I want you to get in touch with AHQ, New Delhi. And ask them to forbid the wearing of, and burn all the 'AMRAAM dodgers' patches. Since clearly, AMRAAM was not 'dodged' by Su-30 (your white man thinks it makes sense).

Comically, the Indian Air force is the first service branch in the world. That has celebrated and made patches for their jets bugging out of the battle zone. US Air force has dodged hundreds of russian made missiles to date. They never made a single patch. They made patches for their 'kills'. But Indian AirForce is not entitled to sit at the table of winners in air combat.

And like them, you will go and sit with the losers and imagine the horrors of dodging missiles. It's not pretty.



A huge cloud of chaff? Released their entire payload of chaff? Really? Were you sitting on the tree top like a monkey with binoculars? Is this what you stoop down to? Screwed Su-30's entire chaff magazine just to reiterate your claim. You are a clown.

He was sitting on SU-30s behind counting.

 

[airomerix]

Update from F-16.net where they accept that they are independently not confirming anything at all and they just copy pasted from old article by pro-Pak reporter Alan Warnes. They have also accepted Su-30 is just a "claim".

I'm sorry if you were not able to sleep for a day or two. Even your white man has also said 'Ah, It makes sense'.

He means it makes all the sense that Su-30 went down.

Let that sink in. And I would encourage you rant and shout more at F-16.net staff (even as the editor has put it).

However, for better or worse, the official F-16 site has endorsed the Su-30 getting a taste of AMRAAM and now I want you to do the following word to word.

I want you to get in touch with AHQ, New Delhi. And ask them to forbid the wearing of, and burn all the 'AMRAAM dodgers' patches. Since clearly, AMRAAM was not 'dodged' by Su-30 (your white man thinks it makes sense).

Comically, the Indian Air force is the first service branch in the world. That has celebrated and made patches for their jets bugging out of the battle zone. US Air force has dodged hundreds of russian made missiles to date. They never made a single patch. They made patches for their 'kills'. But Indian AirForce is not entitled to sit at the table of winners in air combat.

And like them, you will go and sit with the losers and imagine the horrors of dodging missiles. It's not pretty.

It happens when the AAM hits a huge Chaff cloud.
Both Su-30 released their entire chaff payload thus creating a huge cloud of chaff in the skies over Reasi

A huge cloud of chaff? Released their entire payload of chaff? Really? Were you sitting on the tree top like a monkey with binoculars? Is this what you stoop down to? Screwed Su-30's entire chaff magazine just to reiterate your claim. You are a clown.

 

[glycogen]

They have removed the part regarding the Su.30 hit now.

http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-16/airframe-profile/1223/

Still there m8

 

[ummarz]

Update from F-16.net where they accept that they are independently not confirming anything at all and they just copy pasted from old article by pro-Pak reporter Alan Warnes. They have also accepted Su-30 is just a "claim".

I don’t know if it’s just me. But this conversation just feels off. The “F-16.net Editor”’s messages read quite unprofessional. Anyone in the west could write a better ‘email/what ever this is’.

 

[PakSword]

Update from F-16.net where they accept that they are independently not confirming anything at all and they just copy pasted from old article by pro-Pak reporter Alan Warnes. They have also accepted Su-30 is just a "claim".

1 - The information is there to stay as I said before. F-16 dot net considers Air Force Monthly to be a reputable and trusted source. If it hadn't trusted the source, the information wouldn't have made to the website.

2 - The website threw all the Indian claims of shooting down Pakistani F-16 in the bin, which means the site doesn't consider Indian claims trustworthy. So the whole cooked up story supported by radar photos developed in MS paint application was really not taken seriously.

3 - A reputed reporter from a third country at least visited PAF and saw with his own eyes what PAF has to support the claims. That's why he included this claim in his article on AFM.

4 - India, on the other hand, could find courage to invite only one, Christine Fair, who insulted ex-IA officers like they were kids in front of her.

5 - Pakistan brought international journalists to the actual sites that Indian claimed they bombed on 26th, IA/ Indian government couldn't find courage to even disclose the locations of the sites bombed by PAF, let alone taking even national journalists (even the pro-Modi journos) to the sites. International journalists are out of question obviously.

I can go on and on and on, but in the interest of my time, and in the interest of your face saving, just let it go.. Just take a screenshot of F-16 dot net wording for now and whenever you feel like your BP in going down or sugar level is going up, start staring at that screenshot twice a day. You will get some relief within 48 hours.

 

[PakSword]

So satisfying to see the number of guests lurking around.

 

[Thorough Pro]

Besides you can't find a missile that missed its target in an uninhabited area when no one knew which direction the missile came from and in which direction it went within hours especially when IAF has a history of not being able to find their military transport planes for weeks with beacons on board that went down in a known vicinity.
The whole story stinks like shit that only idiots would believe.

It is up-to Indians to show some willingness as after all, invitation is still valid.




A contested claim, for the public indeed.

It doesn't burn when it falls and hits to the ground. The AMRAAM wreckage shown looks pretty charred, and that happens when it hits an aircraft.

 

[Brar]

So satisfying to see the number of guests lurking around.

View attachment 660413

It's entertaining reading comments on this forum. Provides many laughs

 

[PakSword]

It's entertaining reading comments on this forum. Provides many laughs

Ask your fellow countrymen, are they really laughing while reading this thread?

 

[Brar]

Ask your fellow countrymen, are they really laughing while reading this thread?

I think they are actually, at least the ones you haven't banned already.

 

[PakSword]

I think they are actually, at least the ones you haven't banned already.

Haha.. I suggest, instead of laughing hysterically, try your luck one more time to edit the sentence stated on F-16 dot net.

Or even better, try convincing AFM to provide clarification.

 

[Brar]

Haha.. I suggest, instead of laughing hysterically, try your luck one more time to edit the sentence stated on F-16 dot net.

Or even better, try convincing AFM to provide clarification.

I suggest you stop trolling and get back to moderating this forum

 

[PakSword]

India uses Colonel Lawrence Sellin to do its propaganda job whereas Pakistan uses Alan Warnes for her propaganda.

OK, bring the Colonel at least in your defence.

 

[PakSword]

She said nothing on Su-30

Where did I say she said anything about SU-30? I only said she schooled your ex-Brigade major and other participants on your other false claims. A pro Indian journo insulting Indians in front of the whole world is something man.. Your reputation had gone down the drain that very day.

 

[airomerix]

You lack reading comprehension. He actually caled the one who started this a lurking troll (that is you)
He said it makes sense to the above post Which revelaed it all started after some Pakistani troll lied and tried to pass it of as F-16.net independently confirmed false claim about Su-30

He completely exposed your lies that F-16.net net ha sidnependently confirmed it from their sources and instead revealed it was just a copy paste of Alan Warnes.

Hey, Guess what? Look what he just said to me? You think only you can write crap and copy his signature in a private message on f-16.net? You deliberately hid the usernames and posted the lower portion with the copied signature.

@Mods. Gents, what do you think should be done with this lying piece of unfortunate bhakt?