TruthSeeker
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2008
- Messages
- 6,390
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
New Cases Test Optimism on Extremism by U.S. Muslims
By SCOTT SHANE, December 11, 2009, NY Times
WASHINGTON As the years passed after Sept. 11, 2001, without another major attack on American soil and with no sign of hidden terrorist cells, many counterterrorism specialists reached a comforting conclusion: Muslims in the United States were not very vulnerable to radicalization.
American Muslims, the reasoning went, were well assimilated in diverse communities with room for advancement. They showed little of the alienation often on display among their European counterparts, let alone attraction to extremist violence.
But with a rash of recent cases in which Americans have been accused of being drawn into terrorist scheming, the rampage at Fort Hood, Tex., last month and now the alarming account of five young Virginia men who went to Pakistan and are suspected of seeking jihad, the notion that the United States has some immunity against homegrown terrorists is coming under new scrutiny.
It is a concern that President Obama noted in passing in his address on the decision to send 30,000 more American troops to Afghanistan, and one that has grown as the Afghan war and the hunt for Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan intensifies.
These events certainly call the consensus into question, said Robert S. Leiken, who studies terrorism at the Nixon Center, a Washington policy institute, and wrote the forthcoming book Europes Angry Muslims.
The notion of a difference between Europe and United States remains relevant, Mr. Leiken said. But the continuing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the American operations like drone strikes in Pakistan, are fueling radicalization at home, he said.
Just the length of U.S. involvement in these countries is provoking more Muslim Americans to react, Mr. Leiken said.
Concern over the recent cases has profoundly affected Muslim organizations in the United States, which have renewed pledges to campaign against extremist thinking.
Among leaders, theres a recognition that theres a challenge within our community that needs to be addressed, said Alejandro J. Beutel, government liaison at the Muslim Public Affairs Council in Washington, and main author of a report by the council on radicalization and how to combat it.
Mr. Beutel, a Muslim convert from New Jersey, said the council started a grass-roots counterradicalization effort in 2005, but acknowledged that for a while it was on the back burner. He said, Now were going to revive it.
F.B.I. investigators were in Pakistan on Friday questioning the five Virginia men. But it remained unclear whether the men would be deported to the United States, and whether they had broken any laws in either Pakistan or the United States.
At a news conference Friday at the small Virginia mosque where the men had been youth group regulars, mosque officials expressed bewilderment at claims that the men wanted to join the jihad against American troops in Afghanistan.
I never observed any extreme behavior from them, said Mustafa Maryam, who runs the youth group and said he had known the young men since 2006. They were fun-loving, career-focused children. They had a bright future before them.
Also at the press briefing, asked about reports that the five men had contacted a Pakistani militant via the Web, Mahdi Bray, the head of the Freedom Foundation of the Muslim American Society, told reporters that YouTube and social networking sites had become a dangerous recruiting tool for militants.
We are determined not to let religious extremists exploit the vulnerability of our children through this slick, seductive propaganda on the Internet, said Mr. Bray, who is organizing a youth meeting later this month in Chicago to address the issue.
Silence in cyberspace is not an option for us, he said.
The detention of the Virginia men ranging in age from late teens to mid-20s would have prompted soul-searching no matter when it occurred. But it comes after a series of disturbing cases that already had terror experts speculating about a trend.
There were the November shootings that took 13 lives at Fort Hood, with murder charges pending against Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an American-born Muslim and an Army psychiatrist.
There was the arrest of Najibullah Zazi, born in Afghanistan but the seeming model of the striving immigrant as a popular coffee vendor in Manhattan, accused of going to Pakistan for explosives training with the intention of attacking in the United States.
There was David Coleman Headley, a Pakistani-American living in Chicago, accused of helping plan the killings in Mumbai, India, last year and of plotting attacks in Denmark.
There was Bryant Neal Vinas, a Muslim convert from Long Island who participated in a rocket attack on American troops in Afghanistan and used his knowledge of commuter trains in New York to advise Al Qaeda about potential targets.
There were the Somali-Americans from Minnesota who had traveled to Somalia to join a violent Islamist movement.
And there were cases of would-be terrorists who plotted attacks in Texas, Illinois and North Carolina with conspirators who turned out to be F.B.I. informants.
Bruce Hoffman, who studies terrorism at Georgetown University, said the recent cases only confirmed that it was myopic to believe we could insulate ourselves from the currents affecting young Muslims everywhere else.
Like many other specialists, Mr. Hoffman pointed to the United States combat in Muslim lands as the only obvious spur to many of the recent cases, especially those with a Pakistani connection.
The longer weve been in Iraq and Afghanistan, he said, the more some susceptible young men are coming to believe that its their duty to take up arms to defend their fellow Muslims.
A few analysts, in fact, argue that Mr. Obamas decision to send more troops to Afghanistan intended to prevent a terrorist haven there could backfire.
Robert A. Pape, a University of Chicago political scientist, contends that suicide attacks are almost always prompted by resentment of foreign troops, and that escalation in Afghanistan will fuel more plots.
This new deployment increases the risk of the next 9/11, he said. It will not make this country safer.
Yet amid the concern about the five Virginia men and the impact of the wars on Muslim opinion, Audrey Kurth Cronin of the National War College in Washington said she found something to take comfort in.
To me, the most interesting thing about the five guys is that it was their parents that went immediately to the F.B.I., she said. It was members of the American Muslim community that put a stop to whatever those men may have been planning.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/us/12assess.html?_r=1&pagewanted=2
By SCOTT SHANE, December 11, 2009, NY Times
WASHINGTON As the years passed after Sept. 11, 2001, without another major attack on American soil and with no sign of hidden terrorist cells, many counterterrorism specialists reached a comforting conclusion: Muslims in the United States were not very vulnerable to radicalization.
American Muslims, the reasoning went, were well assimilated in diverse communities with room for advancement. They showed little of the alienation often on display among their European counterparts, let alone attraction to extremist violence.
But with a rash of recent cases in which Americans have been accused of being drawn into terrorist scheming, the rampage at Fort Hood, Tex., last month and now the alarming account of five young Virginia men who went to Pakistan and are suspected of seeking jihad, the notion that the United States has some immunity against homegrown terrorists is coming under new scrutiny.
It is a concern that President Obama noted in passing in his address on the decision to send 30,000 more American troops to Afghanistan, and one that has grown as the Afghan war and the hunt for Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan intensifies.
These events certainly call the consensus into question, said Robert S. Leiken, who studies terrorism at the Nixon Center, a Washington policy institute, and wrote the forthcoming book Europes Angry Muslims.
The notion of a difference between Europe and United States remains relevant, Mr. Leiken said. But the continuing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the American operations like drone strikes in Pakistan, are fueling radicalization at home, he said.
Just the length of U.S. involvement in these countries is provoking more Muslim Americans to react, Mr. Leiken said.
Concern over the recent cases has profoundly affected Muslim organizations in the United States, which have renewed pledges to campaign against extremist thinking.
Among leaders, theres a recognition that theres a challenge within our community that needs to be addressed, said Alejandro J. Beutel, government liaison at the Muslim Public Affairs Council in Washington, and main author of a report by the council on radicalization and how to combat it.
Mr. Beutel, a Muslim convert from New Jersey, said the council started a grass-roots counterradicalization effort in 2005, but acknowledged that for a while it was on the back burner. He said, Now were going to revive it.
F.B.I. investigators were in Pakistan on Friday questioning the five Virginia men. But it remained unclear whether the men would be deported to the United States, and whether they had broken any laws in either Pakistan or the United States.
At a news conference Friday at the small Virginia mosque where the men had been youth group regulars, mosque officials expressed bewilderment at claims that the men wanted to join the jihad against American troops in Afghanistan.
I never observed any extreme behavior from them, said Mustafa Maryam, who runs the youth group and said he had known the young men since 2006. They were fun-loving, career-focused children. They had a bright future before them.
Also at the press briefing, asked about reports that the five men had contacted a Pakistani militant via the Web, Mahdi Bray, the head of the Freedom Foundation of the Muslim American Society, told reporters that YouTube and social networking sites had become a dangerous recruiting tool for militants.
We are determined not to let religious extremists exploit the vulnerability of our children through this slick, seductive propaganda on the Internet, said Mr. Bray, who is organizing a youth meeting later this month in Chicago to address the issue.
Silence in cyberspace is not an option for us, he said.
The detention of the Virginia men ranging in age from late teens to mid-20s would have prompted soul-searching no matter when it occurred. But it comes after a series of disturbing cases that already had terror experts speculating about a trend.
There were the November shootings that took 13 lives at Fort Hood, with murder charges pending against Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an American-born Muslim and an Army psychiatrist.
There was the arrest of Najibullah Zazi, born in Afghanistan but the seeming model of the striving immigrant as a popular coffee vendor in Manhattan, accused of going to Pakistan for explosives training with the intention of attacking in the United States.
There was David Coleman Headley, a Pakistani-American living in Chicago, accused of helping plan the killings in Mumbai, India, last year and of plotting attacks in Denmark.
There was Bryant Neal Vinas, a Muslim convert from Long Island who participated in a rocket attack on American troops in Afghanistan and used his knowledge of commuter trains in New York to advise Al Qaeda about potential targets.
There were the Somali-Americans from Minnesota who had traveled to Somalia to join a violent Islamist movement.
And there were cases of would-be terrorists who plotted attacks in Texas, Illinois and North Carolina with conspirators who turned out to be F.B.I. informants.
Bruce Hoffman, who studies terrorism at Georgetown University, said the recent cases only confirmed that it was myopic to believe we could insulate ourselves from the currents affecting young Muslims everywhere else.
Like many other specialists, Mr. Hoffman pointed to the United States combat in Muslim lands as the only obvious spur to many of the recent cases, especially those with a Pakistani connection.
The longer weve been in Iraq and Afghanistan, he said, the more some susceptible young men are coming to believe that its their duty to take up arms to defend their fellow Muslims.
A few analysts, in fact, argue that Mr. Obamas decision to send more troops to Afghanistan intended to prevent a terrorist haven there could backfire.
Robert A. Pape, a University of Chicago political scientist, contends that suicide attacks are almost always prompted by resentment of foreign troops, and that escalation in Afghanistan will fuel more plots.
This new deployment increases the risk of the next 9/11, he said. It will not make this country safer.
Yet amid the concern about the five Virginia men and the impact of the wars on Muslim opinion, Audrey Kurth Cronin of the National War College in Washington said she found something to take comfort in.
To me, the most interesting thing about the five guys is that it was their parents that went immediately to the F.B.I., she said. It was members of the American Muslim community that put a stop to whatever those men may have been planning.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/us/12assess.html?_r=1&pagewanted=2
