Exposed: How Pakistani media bosses told their papers/TVs to support Dhernas

Danish saleem · Nov 26, 2014

According to me ARY is bekawaoo chanel and keep watching it!

Jzaib said:
lol obviously. it is patwari channel u would watch it .

Jzaib · Nov 27, 2014

Danish saleem said:
According to me ARY is bekawaoo chanel and keep watching it!

well only government have enough resource to buy a channel. or give adds.

the whole corporate sector were not giving adds on geo it was only running government adds

Amaa'n · Nov 30, 2014

Chak Bamu said:
She is not alone. Things about Army have always been hush-hush. Plus only the dead sure do not talk. Case in point Saleem Shehzad. He was killed. It is known that he was working on a project that focused on support for militancy within Armed forces. After GHQ attack, PAF base attack, & multiple Naval base attacks, this thesis stands vindicated. But Saleem Shehzad is not about to speak from his grave.

Stuff like this will stay unproven, inuendo, conspiracy, etc... All it takes to get (im)plausible deniability is a bunch of contractors (preferrably LeJ, LeT, or just any group vying for attention & protection), a mobile SIM with Afghan number, and of course some Arabic/Islamic Jihadist name that has not been heard of before. Any journalist can be attacked / killed, in case he (it is still exculsively males that have had a run-in, fatal or not), does not 'get' it. There sure is no proof. Six bullets can come from anywhere, anyone, and it does not matter who the target is. Journalists after all are not made of steel.

People who know (and there are many such) can tell you plenty. But of course no one is going to prove it in a court of law. Who would dare?

So, you can go with your bias. It sure can not hurt, if does not do so yet. But then you might not know unless you get picked up all of a sudden for whatever reason. I should know - I have been there. Hence my proclivity in 'seeing' things that you do not think are conveniently plausible.

I speak from experience. You speak for being naive. The difference is stark.

that is a bit harsh bamu bhai :cray:

anyhow - I am not being biased, infact am here presenting and alternative opinion to keep the discussion going.
Let me remind you, not to long ago, I made a commented that agencies had a role in killing of JSM leader in Khairpur this year - then time and again I have stated that one of the agencies might have called the hit on everyone's beloved Journo---
i cannot change what you might have expeirenced but I will surely share what I have experienced - a 15yr old kid was detained by MI personnel for 6 hours just because that kid's bike had hit Major sb' Car from ARC causing minor damage to rear bumper.
The boy was only allowed to go after 6 hours when his elder brother who happened to be working inside MI too got hold of the news - after 6 hrs

so bamu bhai, I do have an idea of how the ugly side looks like ---
But I hate it when there is nothing wrong with the picture and yet artist is accused for being pathetic ---

Tameem · Nov 30, 2014

Chak Bamu said:
She is not alone. Things about Army have always been hush-hush. Plus only the dead sure do not talk. Case in point Saleem Shehzad. He was killed. It is known that he was working on a project that focused on support for militancy within Armed forces. After GHQ attack, PAF base attack, & multiple Naval base attacks, this thesis stands vindicated. But Saleem Shehzad is not about to speak from his grave.

Stuff like this will stay unproven, inuendo, conspiracy, etc... All it takes to get (im)plausible deniability is a bunch of contractors (preferrably LeJ, LeT, or just any group vying for attention & protection), a mobile SIM with Afghan number, and of course some Arabic/Islamic Jihadist name that has not been heard of before. Any journalist can be attacked / killed, in case he (it is still exculsively males that have had a run-in, fatal or not), does not 'get' it. There sure is no proof. Six bullets can come from anywhere, anyone, and it does not matter who the target is. Journalists after all are not made of steel.

People who know (and there are many such) can tell you plenty. But of course no one is going to prove it in a court of law. Who would dare?

So, you can go with your bias. It sure can not hurt, if does not do so yet. But then you might not know unless you get picked up all of a sudden for whatever reason. I should know - I have been there. Hence my proclivity in 'seeing' things that you do not think are conveniently plausible.

I speak from experience. You speak for being naive. The difference is stark.