What's new

Explosion sinks INS Sindhurakshak Submarine with 18 onboard.

Status
Not open for further replies.
From the size and nature of the explosion, it's seems obvious that it was caused by the fire reaching the ammo bay .

 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
This is from the Royal British Navy having subs closely parked... Or you have U.K in the east on your map..?


I am sure that the 3 Kilos will be like that in the picture shown for the 3 Uk Submarines as one exploded and the two also got fire and get involved in this Chain Reaction...

I am sure the fire was of the ships and port facilities near by..
 
.
It's agreed that Mumbai will be the most sought after target in event ofwar .Won't it be logical to equip it with most potent force to defend with impunity ?. Won't it be logical that in event of Naval attack ( I know it's very unlikely than missile attack-since Mumbai is well within Pakistan'e medium range missiles ) on Mumbai - attack submarine at Mumbai will be handy that one based at Karwar ( further 660 km away ) .

Well I am just a medico . Do not have proper insight how things work out militarily. just guessing ...

Are are being extra cautious. You think Pakistan's medium range missiles were kept from india's financial hub (Mumbai) just because of these 2-3 subs.
Coomee ooonn... :mps:
 
. . . .
The naval bases usually have their own fire brigades. It might be possible that they fire is no longer upto the extent for the Mumbai fire brigade to continue....

Does Pakistan have a good and modern Fire Fighting equipments along with trained men in Karachi, Ormara, Pasni and Gwadar???
 
.
Legendary warrior - You probably have not read my post fully and understood what I am trying to say. You have mixed up things. I never said that attack sub will keep away Pakistan from using missile attack on Mumbai. I said missile attack is more likely than naval attack. Why shouls PN risk its naval assets when it can take out target from far . I said attack subs will prove handy in event of Naval attack on Mumbai ( which I myself acknowledged is unlikely ) . But need to keep option in mind .
 
.
Destroyed by fire, INS Sindhurakshak’s fate uncertain
Last Updated: Wednesday, August 14, 2013, 11:52
Zee Media Bureau/Ajith Vijay Kumar

Mumbai: Although the Indian Navy is yet to come out with an official statement, the fate of INS Sindhurakshak, the Indian submarine that was damaged after fire broke out onboard early Wednesday, remains uncertain.

Navy Chief Admiral DK Joshi is in Mumbai to personally take stock of the situation even as specially trained naval divers are trying their level best to save 18 sailors, including three officers, trapped inside the submarine. Defence Minister AK Antony will also visit Mumbai later today.

Importantly, it is not for the first time that INS Sindhurakshak has suffered damage. The submarine, which was commissioned in 1997, got damaged in February 2010 as well when a fire caused by an explosion in a battery compartment led to the death of one sailor. INS Sindhurakshak was docked at Vishakhapatnam at the time of the incident.

However, details about the nature of today’s explosions have yet to be ascertained. Some media reports claimed that the possibility of weapons having been damaged cannot be ruled out.

As per reports, the submarine has sunk with only a tiny portion of it visible over the surface.

After the 2010 fire, Sindhurakshak was sent to Russia for a costly refit. The ill-fated boat had returned to India on April 29.

As submarines are designed keeping in mind eventualities like the one that occurred today, the focus is on saving the lives of the sailors.

The damage to frontline submarine INS Sindhurakshak is undoubtedly a setback to naval security given India’s push to play a dominant role in the Indian Ocean region.
 
.
From the size and nature of the explosion, it's seems obvious that it was caused by the fire reaching the ammo bay .


Actually the last most violent explosion is white which means rocket fuel and hence we can safely assume it was the Klub missile cooking off. Most submarine pressure hulls will survive a hydrogen blast which will not be followed by a fire because of the oxygen burn off but the news report says the divers cannot open the hatches which means the pressure hull is distorted. Typical of a massive armament cook off due to a fire.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Submarine base near Mumbai is logical to defend naval attack on Mumbai. I am not sure .. I am just guessing .
 
.
MUMBAI: Defence minister AK Antony on Wednesday said that he feels sad about the sailors who lost their lives in the fire on an Indian Navy submarine in Mumbai.

"I feel sad about those Navy personnel who lost their lives for the country," Antony told reporters outside Parliament.

In a major setback to the Indian Navy, a submarine caught fire after a massive explosion and sank in the dockyard here early on Wednesday, with the fate of 18 personnel, including three officers, on board remaining uncertain.

The explosion resulted in a major fire breaking out on board INS Sindhurakshak, a Russian-made Kilo class submarine of the Indian Navy, shortly after midnight, they said.

The fate of 18 persons on board the 2,300 tonne submarine, powered by a combination of diesel generators and electric batteries, is being ascertained, a defence spokesperson said. The Navy has ordered a board of inquiry to probe the explosion and subsequent fire in the submarine, he said.

Fire tenders from the Naval dockyard as well as the Mumbai Fire Brigade were immediately pressed into action, he said.

However, due to the explosion, the submarine has submerged at the dock with only a portion visible above the surface, a defence statement said.

TV footage of the incident showed a huge ball of fire triggered by the explosion lighting up the night sky in Colaba area where the Navy dockyard is located.

The statement said efforts are on to ascertain the safety of the personnel and salvage the submarine.

Navy chief Admiral D K Joshi is on his way to Mumbai. The submarine had returned after a major upgrade programme in Russia 3-4 months ago and was capable of carrying a potent weapons package including the anti-ship 'Club' missiles.

INS Sindhurakshak was not on active duty at the time of the accident, Navy sources said.

The incident has come at a time when the Navy is faced with a depleting submarine fleet.

Commodore (retd) Uday Bhaskar, a former IDSA director, said since the rate of induction of new platforms has not kept up with the kind of wear and tear that a submarine would undertake, the net result is that the Navy's submarine fleet is depleting and the operation load is increasing.

"The fact that the Sindhurakshak (incident) has happened, it is going to have its own adverse impact," he said.

In Delhi, defence minister A K Antony briefed Prime Minister Manmohan Singh about the mishap. Antony told reporters in Parliament that he will be going to Mumbai on Wednesday.

Vice Admiral (retd) A K Singh said an internal explosion in a submarine could be caused by either material failure or by not following standard operating procedure.

He said he suspected that hydrogen gas generated during charging of the batteries of the submarine could have led to the fire which could have spread to the missile compartment area of the warship, causing the massive explosion.

In 2010, a fire broke out on board INS Sindhurakshak leaving a sailor dead and two others injured. That mishap was caused by an explosion in its battery compartment.

India had bought the submarine from Russia as part of a deal in the early 1980s and the warship was commissioned in 1997. It was the ninth of the 10 'Sindhugosh' class diesel- electric vessels that the Navy has in its 16-strong submarine fleet.

In the last few years, there have been several mishaps involving naval vessels. In 2008, another vessel of the Kilo class, INS Sindhugosh, collided with a merchant vessel off Mumbai while participating in a naval exercise.

In 2011, a surface warship INS Vindhyagiri caught fire when it collided with a merchant vessel near the Mumbai harbour while returning from a picnic with families of group of officers deployed on board.

On its way back, it hit another ship leaving the harbour. Nobody was injured but the warship was virtually ruined.

(With inputs from IANS)

Fire-ravaged Indian Navy submarine sinks, Antony confirms deaths - The Times of India

rip-poems10.gif
 
. .
Submarine base near Mumbai is logical to defend naval attack on Mumbai. I am not sure .. I am just guessing .

No Sir you are very wrong. The submarines cannot defend Mumbai as you need minimum 100 meters of depth to ply your games and given the shallow continental shelf of Mumbai you will have to travel nearly 75 miles from Bombay to begin your Patrol. The submarines are for economic stranglehold of Pakistan or Malacca Straits.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom