Okay let's say Modi's speech is mangled and now clarified. Can you explain how it is now and what's been clarified?
I will try. I do not want to start fresh controversies.
The black and white details are still relevant and accurate. Finger 8 to at least 4 some already saying finger 2, are now captured by PLA.
Not captured, but the freedom to patrol up to Finger 8 that existed until this latest development has been blocked. It remains to be seen if it can be reversed by the Indian Army.
If Modi is referring to Galwan issue not PT, then PLA is also taken Galwan land which PLA claims, a land also claimed by India. Is this not true?
No.
There have been PLA concentrations and temporary structures on the heights, and these were to have been vacated according to the commander level discussions (last Monday?). The violence occurred when a Colonel of the Indian Army very rashly walked across to the remaining tent on the ridge that was to have been vacated, and was attacked. I understand that there were three separate clashes, between around 9 in the evening until past midnight.
As I understand it, the PLA had never in the past claimed permanent occupancy on the Galwan Valley but had claimed it as part of the general claims on the Aksai Chin region. Both sides patrolled the Valley, no one had gone up into the heights before, and this was the first occasion when the heights were occupied.
Again, I believe that the final status of this land with regard to patrolling freedom only, not permanent assignment, is yet to be decided. As of the meeting BEFORE the last between commanding officers at the general officer level, all this was to have been vacated and the failure to vacate that led to the clashes. If it was to have been vacated, it was not considered part of the PLA claim that was not to be accessed by the Indian Army. Not yet.
I hope that is helpful.
This is my reconstruction from the messages flying around in all directions and I readily accept that it may finally turn out differently.
If not, please explain how. If China's claims in Galwan were never claimed also by India then why was there dispute since mid 20th century in Galwan?
There has been no overt action on the Galwan Valley, but it does form part of the locations in dispute. There are very many locations like this.