Everyone warns of China’s rise. But its decline could be even worse.

[JohnWick]

It's pathetic that you try to play arrogance being a backward retard like your countryman HR.

@Surya 1 he is nothing but a mentally challenged In capable Troll...don’t take him serious.

 

[Surya 1]

As if they are really unhappy.. US save your backside when China defeated India in 1962 and on the request of US and a sight of good gesture. We withdraw from South Tibet after that.

And we kicked your backside just 5 years later in Chola and Nathula. We integrated Sikkim in 1975. We know you guys rattled but couldn't do anything. We kicked your back in doklam as well. We shall continue to kick your back until you fall in line.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

And we kicked your backside just 5 years later in Chola and Nathula. We integrated Sikkim in 1975. We know you guys rattled but couldn't do anything. We kicked your back in doklam as well. We shall continue to kick your back until you fall in line.

= "Defeated complex"


Ok.

Now go back to charming snakes on your feces and garbage-laden streets.

 

[Surya 1]

= "Defeated complex"


Ok.

Now go back to charming snakes on your feces and garbage-laden streets.

We charm snakes but do not eat it.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

We charm snakes but do not eat it.

Charm it, kiss it, dance around with it.

Do what you want with it.

 

[Surya 1]

Charm it, kiss it, dance around with it.

Do what you want with it.

Ofcourse we will do everything except eating them.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Daddy USA is running from Afghanistan with tail between its legs. India is losing Kashmir and even popular the Indian sport of mob violence against minorities cannot make up for poor governance.

Keep worrying about China’s supposed decline just like you are trying to undo Pakistan. Lol.

 

[Mista]

It’s pretty clear the White House wants to cripple China’s economy to the point that its government, led by the Communist Party, collapses. If that’s the case, it could turn into one of the world’s worst humanitarian catastrophes.

China is home to more than a billion people, many of whom would prefer to see the party maintain control. Others might try to leverage the government’s weakness and violently revolt against it. A civil war on a scale never seen before in human history is therefore sadly a possibility — albeit a very small one.

China won't collapse even if the CCP collapse. The fundamental factor for economic prosperity -an educated populace- is already there and you can't take that away. It's a different generation and the Chinese are equipped with scientific knowledge and modern thinking without religious dogma.

Scenarios such as civil war or mass famine are extremely unlikely; even the soldiers and farmers can think for themselves. This isn't the Mao era where farmers will believe in pseudo-scientific agriculture practices like close planting.

In addition to the decline in food production due to the diversion of effort away from agriculture there was losses in food production because of the erroneous policies promoted by the State. One of these idiocies was close planting. If two plants are set too close to each other there is not enough nutrients in the soil to feed both and both die. The State promoted close planting of grain to increase productivity. The initial growth of a plant derives from the nutrient stored in the seed itself. With close planting the initial germination produces spectacular results, but when the growth of the plant has to depend upon nutrients drawn from the soil the close planting produces failures. During the Great Leap Forward there developed a competition for creating the most striking demonstrations of close planting.

Jasper Becker in Hungry Ghosts traces the foolishness of close planting to the fraudulent science of the Soviet Union. T.D. Lysenko was a quack who got the support of Joseph Stalin and ruled over Soviet genetics for twenty five years. Among the many erroneous notions promoted by Lysenko and which had to be accepted in Marxist countries was his "law of the life of species" which said that plants of the same species do not compete with each other but instead help each other to survive. This was linked to the Marxist notion of classes in which members of the same class do not compete but instead help each other survive. So Marxist ideology seemed to support the notion that the denser grain was planted the better it was for the grain. But in reality this close planting led to withering of the plants after the initial germination phase. Lysenko was responsible for many other foolish notions most based upon the precept that environment not genetics determine plant characteristics. Lysenko argued that if you grew plants a little farther north each year they would adapt to the climate and eventually you would be able to grow oranges in the arctic. All of the Lysenko nonsense had to be accepted in the Soviet Union and promoted in propaganda as scientific truth. The Marxists in China apparently believed it was the truth.

 

[lcloo]

The days China withdraw all the 1.2 trillion US dollars from America Treasury Bills, the world will go bonkers !