What's new

EUROPE REALIZES U.S. HOLDS THE OFF SWITCH ON ITS WEAPONS

AbdulQadir7

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 7, 2024
Messages
1,244
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
1741599880297.jpeg
1741599901245.jpeg


U.S. technology, such as air defense systems, fighter jets like the F-35 and F-16 and even the nuclear deterrent of UK, is crucial to Europe military capabilities. Given that many of these systems depend on U.S maintenance, software upgrades and replacement parts to operate properly this dependence raises serious questions regarding the operational independence of European military. The F-35, for example, depends on American controlled equipment and cannot function without authorization from the U.S. Pentagon.

Through NATO, the United States has historically been a key player in European defense offering logistical support and air power as strategic enablers. But recent events, like as President Donald Trump return and the erratic actions of his government have raised questions about how trustworthy U.S assistance is, Trump has taken a transactional approach to European defense frequently using the prospect of exit as leverage to pressure European nations to boost defense budgets and acquire American military hardware.

With more than 55% of their military imports coming from the United States, European nations have made significant investments in American produced military gear, an excellent example is the F-35 fighter plane, whose operating capabilities are largely reliant on software updates and maintenance provided by the United States, there are concerns about the ability of UK to sustain its nuclear capabilities without American assistance because even its Trident nuclear deterrent is leased from the US and maintained in America.

Concerns over "kill switches" or covert methods that may turn off these systems in the event that the United States decides to stop supporting them have been raised by reliance on American technology, given previous incidents in which the United States has restricted the use of its military hardware by allies, such as when Egypt was barred from utilizing F-16s supplied by the United States in Libya this anxiety is not unjustified.

European officials are looking into ways to lessen their reliance on American military equipment in response to these worries, french President Emmanuel Macron has emphasized the necessity for strategic autonomy in his push for a comprehensive European security strategy, this includes spending money on fighter jets built in Europe, such as the Eurofighter and Rafale, which provide efficient deterrent without requiring as much reliance on the United States.

Europe will need to make large investments in order to improve its military capabilities independently of the United States. To attain strategic autonomy, Europe's military budget is estimated to need to be increased by €125 billion to €250 billion a year. Germany is anticipated to be a key player in this endeavor, possibly spearheading an increase in European military expenditures. In order for European countries to create autonomous military capabilities and preserve operational independence in the face of U.S. unpredictability, they will need to engage in intricate conversations and collaboration.

In summary, Europe's heavy reliance on U.S. military technology has raised concerns about its operational independence. As the U.S. continues to evolve its role in European defense, European nations are scrambling to develop a Plan B, investing in strategic autonomy and reducing their dependence on U.S. systems. This shift towards self-sufficiency will be crucial for maintaining European security in an increasingly unpredictable geopolitical landscape.

1741599999556.jpeg
 
in January 26th 2015, a Greek F16 crashed same day, same hour, and same minute that Alexis Tsipras communist Greek Prime Minister was sworn as PM.





Too blatant
 
Now it's becoming mainstream news the topic of kill switch. It seems some people have just discovered now :laugh:


It's a concern for Europe due to Trump administration.

But I think it should be more a concern for GCC countries.

And that kill switch, it's one of the main keys of Iran Deal 2015.
USA can disable remotelly GCC expensive weapons, but USA can't disable remotelly Iran homegrown missiles program.
So USA side with Iran for a possible future big war in Middle East. That it still could happen any day.
 
Last edited:
Mark Cazalet, editor-in-chief at European Security and Defence Magazine, told Euronews Next he has not heard or seen any hard evidence that a kill switch exists but that it’s "not outside the realm of possibility" that measures to block aircraft software could be produced.

Cazalet said the US "doesn't necessarily need" a kill switch on the F-35 to block the weapon’s use, the government could “simply withhold ammunition and spare parts”.

The debate is very naive, childish and stupid.
The likely use is not a declared use of "We are disabling your weapons".
The likely use is USA side with the enemy (Russia) and reaching accord to use the backdoors in the same moment that the enemy use their weapons, masking the use as successful attacks by the enemy. The kind of betrayal that is common in USA foreign policy history. e.g: Disabling fighter jet when enemy launch a dummy rocket against it. Making fail antimissile systems by several meters and so on.
 
French nuclear weapons are entirely independent.
 
French nuclear weapons are entirely independent.
Too risky affirmation when French military technology uses plenty of USA electronic components.

Have France own integrated circuits? own processors? Nukes are useless without a own system to launch it fast.

France SLBM M51 are reliant in a aerospike that it makes the missile vulnerable to sonic booms near to SLBM launch site.


By the other side, USA dominates France politically especially since last years, when France lost West Africa colonies, and they lost Niger uranium (main French source of electricity is their nuclear plants).
 
Back
Top Bottom