What's new

Energy Poverty: India's Best Kept Secret

PashtunPak

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
Energy Poverty: India's Best Kept Secret

06. 9.11
Business & Politics

energypoverty2.jpg


During a business luncheon with the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) in India for World Environment Day, there was a lot of talk of the steps to take to give India's economy a green makeover and why it's important to do so. The speeches by Minister Ramesh and UNEP Executive Director Achim Steiner were inspiring and made the idea of a green economy concrete and understandable. Something that befuddled me, however, was that there was no mention of energy poverty, or the electrification of rural villages on the agenda. Did I miss something?


Explaining Energy Poverty

Energy poverty is defined as having little or no access to electricity and relying on fossil fuels for daily activities, such as cooking and lighting. When most people think poverty, they think of malnutrition, world hunger, lack of access to clean water, and an array of other social problems involving poverty, but usually not involving energy. Rural villagers who suffer from energy poverty are actually taking the biggest hit of all forms of poverty. The number one killer of children under the age of five is pneumonia. It's not water-borne diseases, AIDS, or any other seemingly obvious reason. Millions of children are dying every year from the basic necessity of light--every 20 seconds to be exact.

Using kerosene lamps for lighting and cooking with cow dung release toxic emissions that are directly linked to eye infections, lower respiration infections, and lung cancer. Inhaling the emissions of a kerosene lamp is equivalent to smoking two packs of cigarettes in a single day, which can probably explain why two-thirds of lung cancer victims that are actually non-smokers. A single kerosene lamp emits one ton of carbon dioxide over the course of five years (or the equivalent from driving your car from Miami, Florida to Seattle, Washington); and in total, all kerosene lamps combined release 144 million tons of carbon emissions into atmosphere each year.


Let's do some math now:

Eighty percent of the energy poverty occurs in India.
Sixty percent of India's population lives in rural villages.
Therefore: The majority of India is rural, and those rural areas make up the majority of energy poverty in the world.


Why isn't anyone else making a big deal about this?

If Minister Ramesh believes that India should be the world leader in solar-power, why is there no discussion on starting in the most affected areas--the villages? In my experience working in the villages of India as part of the Giving the Green Light initiative, the lack of access to electricity goes beyond inconvenience. During a village meeting, I met a woman who had the entire left side of her body burned by a kerosene lamp.

The Global Impact of Kerosene

Not only are they dangerous, but also highly combustible, and when the kerosene is not fully combusted, its produces black soot, or the chemical formally known as black carbon. Black carbon is as scary and gross as it sounds and contributes to 60% of the global warming effect. China and India make up almost 30% of black carbon emissions. Did you catch the math there? If black carbon is the biggest problem in global warming, and China and India are the biggest contributors to black carbon, then China and India are contributing the most amounts to the biggest problem in global warming!

UC San Diego atmospheric scientist V. Ramanathan has conducted research that indicates the warming effects of black carbon are accelerating the melting of the Himalayan glaciers. Hmm, that rings a bell. I'm pretty sure Ramesh pointed out India's vulnerability to global warming and the Himalayan glaciers melting in his speech, since it provides drinking water to billions of people throughout Asia. NO BIGGIE. But where's the black carbon coming from? The villages, people!

Turning Attention to the Villages

No matter what is done to reform India's corporate sector, if the majority of India is made up of rural villagers, why doesn't the majority rule this time? As much as I feel that Ramesh's other points are pivotal for India's economy, I feel like energy poverty was the kid that didn't make the basketball team--or, er, cricket team. If India wants to make it to the (solar) finals, they need to put energy poverty on their game plan.

Energy Poverty: India's Best Kept Secret : TreeHugger
 
I agree..This is a genuinely matter of concern but solar energy needs a huge amount of investement to produce in a mass scale that Gov should take the initiative....
 
I think there are schemes that subsidize solar energy already. We need our masses to be educated to avail them.
 
What the OP has mentioned is indeed one of the biggest bottleneck in our growth… But, the solution is too simplistic and purist and the presentation is incomplete… Like Sidhu says, Statistics are like a lady in a bikini... The right things are always covered... First, it just highlights one side of the problem and does not go into what is India doing to tackle the issue and second, like I mentioned, the shown path is too simplistic...

Solar energy is not the only solution and Subsidy on Solar is not the only method and shows a very very limited view... Even with a 50% subsidy, Solar production costs will be 12 rupees per unit as against 3-4 rupees per unit by thermal Power and such expensive costs can not help you move people out of rural energy poverty… What we need a scaleable model and a better future mix... My 2 pidly cents on this:

One of the core problems of Indian infrastructure limitations is the availability of Electricity/Energy... To bring about a comparitive analysis... India has around 180GW of installed power against some 1000GW in US, around 750GW in China and around 120GW in Brazil... So, first and foremost, India needs to add electricity generation capacity installed at a break neck speed and add it at lower costs/unit generated

The fundamental point is that India needs to bring down the cost of its energy, in order to make it available for sustainable use by poorer households and it needs to do so in a arguably a healthier (read greener) way... Let's talk about these two problems separately.

First, cost of energy can be brought down by scale of generation at one place... example... if you have one plant producing 1000MW of power and another producing 4000MW of power, general rule of the thumb is that the power output from a 4000MW plant is cheaper as the investment costs (plant area, number of boilers etc) incurred are generally lesser than the scale i.e. it is not built at 4X the cost of a 1000MW power plant... India's strategy to add 8 new Ultra Mega Power Projects (UMPP) in the next 5 years (in addition to already existing plans for capacity addition) is the first step in that direction... with each power plant expected to add 4GW in capacity and thus adding electricity at lower prices and also enough energy that will make the spread of energy distribution to rural areas viable.. Which it is not currently!

Obviously, the largest problem was the scale of this expansion and the involvement of private sector in these UMPPs... As India had a history of only govt. run power plants and they were very inefficient in generation and distribution... With private players jumping in, a definite flip (to the addition speed and efficiency) is foreseeable and that will help address the problem of reducing energy shortage at a much stronger capacity

In addition to this, Indian electricity is very expensive due to very high distribution losses... At time around 30% losses of generated electricity... If this can be controlled/reduced, then the wastage factor of electricity cost will reduce and help unit become cheaper by 15-20% (as 10-15% distribution losses will always remain). India has to work aggressively to improve our distribution systems...

The third problem is of theft.. This also adds another burden of 15% to the distribution... India is already considering smart metering, smart grid and other proactive solutions to curb this menace... This will ensure that the price can further come down by a factor of 3-5%...

Obviously, in addition to the above mentioned, subsidy for Solar and Wind will only increase the speed of reduction of the 'energy poverty' in India.

State wise planning to support these interventions/participation by private sector, by means of monetary support from Policy, will further strengthen the realization potential of these initiatives... e.g. the latest Generation Based Incentive of 50 paise per unit in Wind Business has helped India grow from 1200MW a year market to 1800MW a year market in a single year...

The above mentioned steps will take care of your problem of energy availability and at lower prices... By 2014/15, you will notice that India generation will grow at the fastest speed in the world and at a scale never seen before and will be a 300GW market (a 100% jump in 7-8 years)...

Second, the other problem of ensuring a green expansion has to be addressed at three ends

1. Improving efficiency of conventional fuel production... Use of clean coal (coal that has been treated to reduce the emission), new technologies (like IGCC power plants offered by GE, that improve the output per unit consumed) and bigger scale machines (like the super-critical 800MW generators, again introduced by GE) will help improve the efficiency of these machine, while reducing the emissions from the production cycle. However, one should be clear that coal will form the central form of electricity production techniques, till the developed world continues to use the same... we can not be the sages who shift to all green technologies and lose out competitivenes (in energy prices), when developed countries keep on producing their electricity on coal (as majority source).

2. Shifting part of new production to efficient fossil fuels (which are still greener platforms) like Gas... India is already taking steps in this direction... Promoting use of Gas turbine based plants, promoting exploration off Krishna-Godavri and acquisition of Shale Gas assets globally form the three legs of this strategy

3. Invest in non-conventional energy resources like Wind, Solar (the most expensive currently), geothermal and biogas plants... India is already at the fore front of this moment and is among the top-5 in the world on new installations of these types... however, there are two important points to stay focused on (a) invest in scale in Wind and Solar to drive down their costs dramatically (b) accept that we can not replace kerosene completely till we work out equally economic ways to replace it (by slowly reducing the subsidy on kerosene and thus increasing its price to make it unviable and investing (with scale) in green-tech like small solar or small wind or community wind/solar to make then competitive with kerosene)

However, this will take then next 2 decades and I believe that the govenment should definitely refrain from taking the 'correct sounding international standard' of going 'all green' and avoid the mistakes like Ramesh (Environment Minster) made in the recent concluded climate summit by saying that India can accept binding goals... We need to be a responsible nation as far as preserving our environment and making sure that energy reaches the poor, is concerned... But, we need to be answerable to ourselves only and should not take the burden for pollution created by developed economies... Climate change is the biggest negotiation table of any kind in the world and BRICSA (not India only) need to have their priority of mass scale social access and thus, upliftment clearly and strongly presented in these negotiations.. No one has ever gained from being purists and we should not try to make a new example... Simply stating that we contribute to the world Poverty seemed a bit tilted or pessimistic view...

Every problem has to have a context and a solution, which should be accompanies by the effort, if one has to justify the representation as unbiased... Context is the Indian history and our gradual maturity from a licence Raj, socialist republic to a gradually flowering democracy, which is opening to the methods of the world and gaining from it, while not losing our hard acquired conservatism at the same time... If you have reached this far... Thanks for your patience!

As always, I am happy to discuss and debate this further...
 
when land acquisition takes minimum 5 years then how can we ever solve energy crisis??
 
when land acquisition takes minimum 5 years then how can we ever solve energy crisis??

Tell me one country where it does not exist (except China, Russia etc..., where Communist (and thus, the lack of being scare of the needs of elections and electorate) governments make it a bit easier for land acquisitions) ... In world's foremost democracies, this is termed as NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard).. And forget about Nuclear plants, you have people objecting to installing Wind Turbines there... Land Acquisition takes time globally and the only solution to that is time consuming processes and delays... Unfortunately! Tis sad, but tis true!
 
Eighty percent of the energy poverty occurs in India.

@ OP

what does this statement mean??

It seems ambiguous.......
 
Back
Top Bottom