What's new

Emerging and Frontier Markets: Economic and Geopolitical Analysis

You know that many good quality products aren't available in China, despite that those goods being manufactured in China, they are for export only

Not really. This may sound a bit rude, but the saying goes "you get what you paid for". You can't expect high quality goods if you only shop at the discount bin at Mal-mart. I lived in both US and China. High quality is available in both countries and in both countries, they both cost more than their cheaper alternatives. For example, if you get the same Chinese product, made by the same company in Malwart and Costco. Chances are the ones in Costco is going to have higher quality and cost a bit more.

Of course, it is true that people in US has also more income-----duh, if US actually had less income than China on relative terms, it wouldn't have been the top economic power right now. Right now, US and China GDP is about even in term of PPP, but with 1/4 of China's population, US per capita GDP is still much higher (I am well aware that per capita isn't the same thing as income or disposable income, but it is the underplaying principle). If the current trend goes, it will take China a few decades to catch up with developed countries.
 
.
Not really. This may sound a bit rude, but the saying goes "you get what you paid for". You can't expect high quality goods if you only shop at the discount bin at Mal-mart. I lived in both US and China. High quality is available in both countries and in both countries, they both cost significantly more than their cheaper alternatives.

Of course, it is true that people in US has also more income-----duh, if US actually had less income than China on relative terms, it wouldn't have been the top economic power right now. Right now, US and China GDP is about even in term of PPP, but with 1/4 of China's population, US per capita GDP is still much higher (I am well aware that per capita isn't the same thing as income or disposable income, but it is the underplaying principle). If the current trend goes, it will take China a few decades to catch up with developed countries.


It's not about purchasing power, it's about regulations. US and EU have pretty strict regulation on imported goods, where as Chinese domestic lack regulations and law enforcement, that's why the same manufacturer sells good quality products to US/EU while at the same time selling junks in China.
 
.
It's not about purchasing power, it's about regulations. US and EU have pretty strict regulation on imported goods, where as Chinese domestic lack regulations and law enforcement, that's why the same manufacturer sells good quality products to US/EU while at the same time selling junks in China.

There's no law against selling junk. There's plenty of Dollar stores. You just can't sell unsafe stuff.
 
.
It's not about purchasing power, it's about regulations. US and EU have pretty strict regulation on imported goods, where as Chinese domestic lack regulations and law enforcement, that's why the same manufacturer sells good quality products to US/EU while at the same time selling junks in China.

Erm, why would they do that? Counting in custom tax, transportation cost and loss during transition, if they could sell the product locally, why would they get it somewhere else? Like I said, there are high and low quality product everywhere. You get what you paid for.
 
.
The differences between the home and host country environment cause a liability of foreigners, which, is based on three factors:

1) Exchange risk of operating in a foreign market

2) Local authorities’ discrimination against entrant firms

3) Firms’ unfamiliarity with the foreign market

Thus, an important element of this liability is the knowledge gap of the entering firm, which causes uncertainty. In internationalization process theory, the liability of foreignness is traditionally conceptualized as a psychic distance between the firma and the foreign market and is described as the factors that prevent the flow of information between the firm and the foreign market. Economists stress, “Market uncertainty concerns the decision-makers perceived lack of ability to estimate the present and the future market and market-influencing factors.”

This argument follows along the lines by Milliken who states that uncertainty should be viewed through the eyes of the beholder. Such perceptions of foreign markets resulting in uncertainty involve three main aspects:

1) Inability to assign probabilities to the likelihood of future events

2) Lack of information to the likelihood of future events

3) Inability to predict accurately what the outcomes of a decision might be.

Now this resembles the Uppsala Model.
 
.
The differences between the home and host country environment cause a liability of foreigners, which, is based on three factors:

1) Exchange risk of operating in a foreign market

2) Local authorities’ discrimination against entrant firms

3) Firms’ unfamiliarity with the foreign market

Thus, an important element of this liability is the knowledge gap of the entering firm, which causes uncertainty. In internationalization process theory, the liability of foreignness is traditionally conceptualized as a psychic distance between the firma and the foreign market and is described as the factors that prevent the flow of information between the firm and the foreign market. Economists stress, “Market uncertainty concerns the decision-makers perceived lack of ability to estimate the present and the future market and market-influencing factors.”

This argument follows along the lines by Milliken who states that uncertainty should be viewed through the eyes of the beholder. Such perceptions of foreign markets resulting in uncertainty involve three main aspects:

1) Inability to assign probabilities to the likelihood of future events

2) Lack of information to the likelihood of future events

3) Inability to predict accurately what the outcomes of a decision might be.

Now this resembles the Uppsala Model.

Sorry, I don't follow. To what/whom was this addressed? The challenges of MNCs in emerging markets?
 
.
Erm, why would they do that? Counting in custom tax, transportation cost and loss during transition, if they could sell the product locally, why would they get it somewhere else? Like I said, there are high and low quality product everywhere. You get what you paid for.


Many Chinese consumers aren't willing to pay for higher-priced domestic brand goods
 
.
Many Chinese consumers aren't willing to pay for higher-priced domestic brand goods

And some are willing. This also contradicts with your original claim that the high quality products are not available in China. I repeat, you get what you paid for. Don't expect high quality goods unless you are willing to pay the appropriate cost.
 
.
http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2014/09/09/is-africas-bond-rush-too-risky/

Is Africa’s bond rush too risky?
Sep 9, 2014 10:42amby Mian Ridge
10

African countries have been issuing bonds at a furious pace: the value of foreign currency sovereign bonds issued so far this year has already overtaken last year’s total (see chart below). That has raised concerns that they are vulnerable to tightening by the US Federal Reserve, which could result in cash being pulled from EMs.

But analysts tend to think African bonds will withstand changes to monetary policy in the US, with yields holding steady.


Source: Capital Economics

In a note, Capital Economics acknowledged that the “clear risks” to borrowing in foreign currencies included exposure to exchange rate risk and substantial yield increases. The most likely trigger for a bond and currency sell-off was a rise in US interest rates, it said, potentially sparking turbulence in EM financial markets reminiscent of last years’s “taper tantrum”.

But history probably wouldn’t repeat itself, it said. Though the Fed would probably tighten more quickly than generally expected, it would likely be a gradual process rather than a slamming on of the brakes:

our view is that underlying Treasury yields will only drift upwards over the next few years. Even if the costs of servicing foreign currency debt rise, governments’ ability to repay is generally much stronger than it was a decade ago. African economies have grown fairly quickly over this period, so relative to GDP, the value of bond issuance this year looks less of an outlier.

Andreas Kolbe, an EMEA strategist at Barclays agreed. “I don’t think there is any reason to be particularly concerned about African bonds in the event of Fed tightening at this stage,” he told beyondbrics. “Tighter monetary conditions in the US are unlikely to lead to a pullback from EM comparable to what we saw last year”.

He said that while last year’s outflows were primarily retail-driven, institutional allocations to EM had proven to be more strategic and sticky. “With the increased weight of institutional investors in the market now and given that any US rates re-pricing is likely to be much more gradual this time, we think higher-spread EM credits with supportive bottom-up fundamentals – including some African issuers – should not be overly sensitive to US tightening,” he said.


Source: Capital Economics

African countries, many of which have growing economies but pressing infrastructure needs, have come to regard bonds as an efficient means of raising funds. Through foreign currency bonds, as Capital Economics points out, they can attract investors who won’t hold African currencies in their portfolios. Bonds also allow them independence from multilateral institutions like the International Monetary Fund. It is cheaper for them to issue in US dollars than in their own currencies. And in recent months they have wanted to take advantage of cheap borrowing as central banks keep interest rates low.

Some, though, have warned that borrowers should not become dependent on what may be a temporary period of cheap loans. The IMF has warned African governments of the risk in taking on more debt via sovereign bonds.

Ghana raised some eyebrows this month when, a few weeks after seeking an IMF bailout it said it would raise money from international bond investors. The country is trying to fix a growing budget deficit and rising inflation.

Seth Terkper, Ghana’s finance minister, said the country planned to raise up to $1bn, which might also refinance an existing 2017 bonds, via a swap.

The west African country issued $750m in international bonds in 2007, becoming the first mainland sub-Saharan African country other than South Africa to tap foreign debt investors. Investors poured into the bonds, in part because the major cocoa-growing country was expected to reap a windfall from newly discovered oil fields.

But oil output grew slower than expected, failing to keep up with a surging government wage bill.

Uganda recently held up Ghana as a bad example when it said it would not seek to issue dollar-denominated debt.

But other African countries have not shared Uganda’s view. Ghana’s plan follows bond sales by Kenya, Senegal and the Ivory Coast.

Senegal’s 10-year bond, issued in July, received offers equal to eight times the $500m it raised. The week before, the Ivory Coast attracted $5bn of orders on a 10-year $750m bond. In June, Kenya received $8bn of orders on its $2bn issuance – the biggest ever debut sovereign bond for an African country.
 
.
I live in US. There are certain items that is cheaper in US, particular the luxury goods which China has a 100% import tax, but in general living is much cheaper in China than US.
Very interesting.

Are there any PPP data samples in contrast that can help us to figure out the differences of China and US?

I mean the researchers may choose a basket of products/price in both country to do comparative studies.
 
.
Believe me as I lived for a short time in US. If you make $50k USD/year in China, you're better off than making $50k USD/year in the USA.
Utility should be considered. Around 300k RMB/year is a typical manager level's salary at 60P(more than 60%) that I estimate.
With this payment, you can buy house, car(10K - 20K) and live a good life in China especially in 2-3 tier cities. To buy a house in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen you should set aside at least 600k for minimum down payment.
 
.
http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2014/09/09/is-africas-bond-rush-too-risky/

Is Africa’s bond rush too risky?
Sep 9, 2014 10:42amby Mian Ridge
10

African countries have been issuing bonds at a furious pace: the value of foreign currency sovereign bonds issued so far this year has already overtaken last year’s total (see chart below). That has raised concerns that they are vulnerable to tightening by the US Federal Reserve, which could result in cash being pulled from EMs.

But analysts tend to think African bonds will withstand changes to monetary policy in the US, with yields holding steady.


Source: Capital Economics

In a note, Capital Economics acknowledged that the “clear risks” to borrowing in foreign currencies included exposure to exchange rate risk and substantial yield increases. The most likely trigger for a bond and currency sell-off was a rise in US interest rates, it said, potentially sparking turbulence in EM financial markets reminiscent of last years’s “taper tantrum”.

But history probably wouldn’t repeat itself, it said. Though the Fed would probably tighten more quickly than generally expected, it would likely be a gradual process rather than a slamming on of the brakes:

our view is that underlying Treasury yields will only drift upwards over the next few years. Even if the costs of servicing foreign currency debt rise, governments’ ability to repay is generally much stronger than it was a decade ago. African economies have grown fairly quickly over this period, so relative to GDP, the value of bond issuance this year looks less of an outlier.

Andreas Kolbe, an EMEA strategist at Barclays agreed. “I don’t think there is any reason to be particularly concerned about African bonds in the event of Fed tightening at this stage,” he told beyondbrics. “Tighter monetary conditions in the US are unlikely to lead to a pullback from EM comparable to what we saw last year”.

He said that while last year’s outflows were primarily retail-driven, institutional allocations to EM had proven to be more strategic and sticky. “With the increased weight of institutional investors in the market now and given that any US rates re-pricing is likely to be much more gradual this time, we think higher-spread EM credits with supportive bottom-up fundamentals – including some African issuers – should not be overly sensitive to US tightening,” he said.


Source: Capital Economics

African countries, many of which have growing economies but pressing infrastructure needs, have come to regard bonds as an efficient means of raising funds. Through foreign currency bonds, as Capital Economics points out, they can attract investors who won’t hold African currencies in their portfolios. Bonds also allow them independence from multilateral institutions like the International Monetary Fund. It is cheaper for them to issue in US dollars than in their own currencies. And in recent months they have wanted to take advantage of cheap borrowing as central banks keep interest rates low.

Some, though, have warned that borrowers should not become dependent on what may be a temporary period of cheap loans. The IMF has warned African governments of the risk in taking on more debt via sovereign bonds.

Ghana raised some eyebrows this month when, a few weeks after seeking an IMF bailout it said it would raise money from international bond investors. The country is trying to fix a growing budget deficit and rising inflation.

Seth Terkper, Ghana’s finance minister, said the country planned to raise up to $1bn, which might also refinance an existing 2017 bonds, via a swap.

The west African country issued $750m in international bonds in 2007, becoming the first mainland sub-Saharan African country other than South Africa to tap foreign debt investors. Investors poured into the bonds, in part because the major cocoa-growing country was expected to reap a windfall from newly discovered oil fields.

But oil output grew slower than expected, failing to keep up with a surging government wage bill.

Uganda recently held up Ghana as a bad example when it said it would not seek to issue dollar-denominated debt.

But other African countries have not shared Uganda’s view. Ghana’s plan follows bond sales by Kenya, Senegal and the Ivory Coast.

Senegal’s 10-year bond, issued in July, received offers equal to eight times the $500m it raised. The week before, the Ivory Coast attracted $5bn of orders on a 10-year $750m bond. In June, Kenya received $8bn of orders on its $2bn issuance – the biggest ever debut sovereign bond for an African country.


@LeveragedBuyout



This is an awesome article and I remember reading an article a whiles back about investors’ attitudes toward Africa’s growth prospects being influenced by Asia’s experience of an export-led growth. One tends to agree and lend a sympathetic ear towards analysts who voice that an export-led growth is critical if African countries are to sustain growth and if whether there is scope for export led growth, especially in the nonresource sector. I think that export level growth is important, but given the realities on the ground amongst African countries, I think that one key factor to growth would be import substitution as well as intraregional trade. And I’m interested to know if there is actual performance differences between Africa’s resource rich countries vs Africa’s resource limited countries. One can understand that there probably will be greater macroeconomic stress as well as significantly higher commodity prices they have to pay, but am interested to know how these countries can offset such commodity prices to favor growth?
 
.
@LeveragedBuyout



This is an awesome article and I remember reading an article a whiles back about investors’ attitudes toward Africa’s growth prospects being influenced by Asia’s experience of an export-led growth. One tends to agree and lend a sympathetic ear towards analysts who voice that an export-led growth is critical if African countries are to sustain growth and if whether there is scope for export led growth, especially in the nonresource sector. I think that export level growth is important, but given the realities on the ground amongst African countries, I think that one key factor to growth would be import substitution as well as intraregional trade. And I’m interested to know if there is actual performance differences between Africa’s resource rich countries vs Africa’s resource limited countries. One can understand that there probably will be greater macroeconomic stress as well as significantly higher commodity prices they have to pay, but am interested to know how these countries can offset such commodity prices to favor growth?

This report will be of interest to you, especially pages 4, 10-11, and 21-25.

http://www.worldbank.org/content/da...Africa/Report/Africas-Pulse-brochure_Vol8.pdf
 
. .
@Nihonjin1051 whats your PhD in?

@LeveragedBuyout I always preferred Hostile Takeovers, but your demeanor suits your ID.

Been a couple of years since I read econ/ finance books. Need to brush up.

I think that one key factor to growth would be import substitution as well as intraregional trade.

This is where things get tricky. Political Economics, remember someone's got to buy those goods, if you piss off the TNCs already in your country chances are they're going to make sure your countries goods aren't going to reach the ports of Developed Countries.

Remember Import Substitution Industrialization, you have to place high tarriffs on imported goods, makign them costly for the citizens to buy(not the wealthy), so they turn to the domestic brands which are deficient in quality. Some politicians have become zealots, and have misunderstood this theory. By thinking it means Import Elimination. And long term this doesn't/ can't support a countries development.

Its good for short term, but the country has to transition into focused sectors of the industry. And go into Export-Orientation. And end protectionist policies on the inefficient industries.

The tricky part is getting a developed country to help you out, by not slapping sanctions on you for protectionist policies. At least in the beginning.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom