Economist recent article is well planned attack on Imran khan. Pakistanis turned against its army

[Cash GK]

The recent article published by Economist, which suggests that they have hired writers supporting the PDM government in Pakistan on the agenda of the British and international establishment.
Economist, being one of the leading newspaper in world. has recently published an article which has stirred controversy among the masses. The article highlights the stance of Pakistanis turning against their army, and as a result, the military has been provoked by the international establishment against the Former Prime Minister, Imran Khan.
Upon reviewing the article, it becomes evident that the language used is Indian or Pakistani English, and the article gives a clear indication that the international establishment is trying to influence the Pakistani army chief, General Asim Munir, against Imran Khan. As he was supposed to BE retire before the retirement of his predecessor, General Bajwa.
Moreover, the article fails to recognize that demanding elections is a legal and confidential right.The article in question supports the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) government and their agenda of international establishment, despite their failure to comply with the constitutional norms of the country. The PDM government has been accused of not being ready for elections, which is a clear violation of democratic practices.

 

[Imran Khan]

pakistnais are not blind .

our army is still living in colonial era and we can see it

 

[Cash GK]

pakistnais are not blind .

our army is still living in colonial era and we can see it

Agree. But they provoked army chief againt khan which is already bitter enemy of khan. They forget to realize that elections are only way forward. It was very low from Economist.

 

[nahtanbob]

Is there a link to the article title ?

 

[Redbeanpaste]

I don't see any such article in the Economist. Could you post a link?

Maybe you are thinking of WSJ?

 

[ThunderCat]

The army isn't entirely innocent. They have a history of interfierence and meddling in the country's politics not to mention corruption, even if all this is exaggerated.